Abstract
Increasing the yield of kidney bean plants is a challenge to humankind dependent on many management practices e.g., fertilizing. Despite the efforts of workers in the plant nutrition field to find ways to maximize the productivity of strategic crops such as Phaseolus vulgaris L, only a few publications focus on the effect of potassium fulvate combined with manganese on the plant. So, a pot trial was executed during the growing season of 2022 at the Farm of Agric. Fac., Mansoura Univ., Egypt, (31°03′00″N 31°22′59″E) to evaluate the response of Phaseolus vulgaris L plant to applying potassium fulvate and different manganese sources via different application methods. There are two factors under this experimentation; the main factor was the application methods (M1: Foliar application and M2: Soil addition).While the sub main factor was the added substances either solely or in combinations i.e., T1: Control (without added substances),T2: Potassium fulvate at rate of 0.12 g L-1 , T3: Potassium fulvate at rate of 0.15 g L-1 , T4: Manganese at rate of 0.50 g L-1 using MnSO4.4H2O, (24%Mn),T5: Manganese at rate of 1.153 g L-1 using Mn -EDTA (12%Mn),T6: As a combined treatment (T2 + T4), T7: As a combined treatment (T2 + T5), T8: As a combined treatment (T3 + T4) and T9: As a combined treatment (T3 + T5).The results showed that the kidney bean plant fertilized with the studied substances via the foliar application method had growth criteria e.g., plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1), chlorophyll (SPAD) as well as physical and qualitative traits of pods e.g., No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm), pods yield (ton h-1), N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1), protein, carbohydrates and fiber values greater than those of the corresponding plants fertilized with the studied substances as soil addition. Concerning the studied substances, the superior treatment was T9 treatment followed by T8 then T7 , T6, T3 , T2, T5 , T4, respectively and lately T1 treatment (without added substances).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application yielded greater kidney bean plant height and fresh and dry foliage weights than soil addition.
- Taxon
- kidney bean
Phaseolus vulgarise0 - Treatment
- foliar application methode0
- Outcome
- plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- soil additione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the kidney bean plant fertilized with the studied substances via the foliar application method had growth criteria e.g., plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1), chlorophyll (SPAD) as well as physical and qualitative traits of pods e.g., No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm), pods yield (ton h-1), N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1), protein, carbohydrates and fiber values greater than those of the corresponding plants fertilized with the studied substances as soil addition”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application yielded greater chlorophyll than soil addition.
- Taxon
- kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application methode0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll (SPAD)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- soil additione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the kidney bean plant fertilized with the studied substances via the foliar application method had growth criteria e.g., plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1), chlorophyll (SPAD) as well as physical and qualitative traits of pods e.g., No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm), pods yield (ton h-1), N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1), protein, carbohydrates and fiber values greater than those of the corresponding plants fertilized with the studied substances as soil addition”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application yielded greater pod number, length, and diameter than soil addition.
- Taxon
- kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application methode0
- Outcome
- No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- soil additione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the kidney bean plant fertilized with the studied substances via the foliar application method had growth criteria e.g., plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1), chlorophyll (SPAD) as well as physical and qualitative traits of pods e.g., No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm), pods yield (ton h-1), N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1), protein, carbohydrates and fiber values greater than those of the corresponding plants fertilized with the studied substances as soil addition”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application yielded greater pod yield than soil addition.
- Taxon
- kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application methode0
- Outcome
- pods yield (ton h-1)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- soil additione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the kidney bean plant fertilized with the studied substances via the foliar application method had growth criteria e.g., plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1), chlorophyll (SPAD) as well as physical and qualitative traits of pods e.g., No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm), pods yield (ton h-1), N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1), protein, carbohydrates and fiber values greater than those of the corresponding plants fertilized with the studied substances as soil addition”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application yielded greater pod N, P, K, and Mn than soil addition.
- Taxon
- kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application methode0
- Outcome
- N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- soil additione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the kidney bean plant fertilized with the studied substances via the foliar application method had growth criteria e.g., plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1), chlorophyll (SPAD) as well as physical and qualitative traits of pods e.g., No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm), pods yield (ton h-1), N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1), protein, carbohydrates and fiber values greater than those of the corresponding plants fertilized with the studied substances as soil addition”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application yielded greater pod protein, carbohydrates, and fiber than soil addition.
- Taxon
- kidney beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- foliar application methode0
- Outcome
- protein, carbohydrates and fibere0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- soil additione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the kidney bean plant fertilized with the studied substances via the foliar application method had growth criteria e.g., plant height (cm), foliage fresh and dry weights (g plant-1), chlorophyll (SPAD) as well as physical and qualitative traits of pods e.g., No. of pods plant-1, pods length (cm) and diameter (cm), pods yield (ton h-1), N, P, K (%), Mn (mgkg-1), protein, carbohydrates and fiber values greater than those of the corresponding plants fertilized with the studied substances as soil addition”
Claim · model-written summary
T9 ranked best, followed by T8, T7, T6, T3, T2, T5, T4, and T1.
- Taxon
- Phaseolus vulgaris LPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- T9 treatmente0
- Outcome
- superior treatmente0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- T1 treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the superior treatment was T9 treatment followed by T8 then T7 , T6, T3 , T2, T5 , T4, respectively and lately T1 treatment (without added substances)”
t0“Phaseolus vulgaris L”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →application · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →application · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →application · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →application · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.