Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In some cases foliar Mg decreased K content by 10-20% on average.

A claim from Response of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars to Foliar Applications of Magnesium · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In some cases foliar Mg decreased K content by 10-20% on average.

Taxon
French BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
foliar Mg applicationse0
Outcome
K contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
10-20%e0
Qualifier
in some casese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“French Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–23
e0

“foliar Mg applications showed a significant effect particularly on sugars, calcium, phosphate, sulphate and Mg contents in pods. On the other hand, a significant effect on the accumulation of nitrates was noted, especially with split applications (144% increase vs. unfertilised) and, in some cases, an antagonistic effect on K content (10-20% decrease on average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1271

Title

Response of French Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars to Foliar Applications of Magnesium

Fabio Stagnari; Andrea Onofri; Michele Pisante Italian Journal of Agronomy 2009. doi:10.4081/ija.2009.3.101

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e5d8b7ba76a1f7489ffb4c433840bde963f5f736e674d51cffd0e003709ed38c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Omission of Mg decreased shoot K, Ca, Mg, P, and S relative to complete nutrient solution.

    Macronutrient deficiency in snap bean considering physiological, nutritional, and growth aspects · 2020 · compared with plants grown in the complete nutrient solution

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 29 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.