Paper · 2023 · AgriEngineering

Can Soil Moisture and Crop Production Be Influenced by Different Cropping Systems?

Rafael Felippe Ratke; Alan Mario Zuffo; Fábio Steiner; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The different conditions of soil vegetation cover combined with irrigation management and/or agricultural production systems can influence soil moisture content and crop yields. This study investigated the impact of agricultural production systems and center pivot irrigation management on soil moisture content during the cultivation of soybean and off-season corn crops. Two field experiments were conducted during the 2018–2019 growing season in tropical Cerrado soil conditions; one experiment consisted of the application of three irrigation water depths (0%, 50%, and 100% of the crop evapotranspiration) during soybean cultivation in a no-tillage system under ruzigrass (Urochloa ruziziensis) straw, and the second experiment consisted of the intercropped or nonintercropped cultivation of corn hybrids with ruzigrass in an agricultural area with and without the influence of eucalyptus reforestation. The volumetric soil moisture was measured using an electronic soil moisture meter (Hidrofarm), and the 1000-grain mass and yield of the soybean and corn were measured in the two trials. Irrigation and the no-till system did not influence soybean yields. The soybean cultivars NA 5909 RG and TMG 7067 IPRO presented TGM above 180 g, and this represented on average a 22% higher TGM than the BMX DESAFIO RR and CD 2737 RR. The presence of eucalyptus forest promoted a 1.5% increase in soil moisture in the corn crop. Soil management systems, such as irrigation, use cover crops, which may not increase the productivity of soybean and corn crops as expected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and no-till did not influence soybean yields.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Irrigation and the no-till systeme0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation and the no-till system did not influence soybean yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1161 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cultivars NA 5909 RG and TMG 7067 IPRO had TGM above 180 g.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
NA 5909 RG and TMG 7067 IPROe1
Outcome
TGMe1
Value
above 180 ge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The soybean cultivars NA 5909 RG and TMG 7067 IPRO presented TGM above 180 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1239 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cultivars NA 5909 RG and TMG 7067 IPRO had on average 22% higher TGM than BMX DESAFIO RR and CD 2737 RR.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Material
NA 5909 RG and TMG 7067 IPROe1
Outcome
TGMe2
Direction
highere2
Value
22%e2
Comparator
BMX DESAFIO RR and CD 2737 RRe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The soybean cultivars NA 5909 RG and TMG 7067 IPRO presented TGM above 180 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1239 · show in text ↑
e2

“this represented on average a 22% higher TGM than the BMX DESAFIO RR and CD 2737 RR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The presence of eucalyptus forest increased soil moisture in the corn crop by 1.5%.

Treatment
The presence of eucalyptus foreste3
Outcome
soil moisturee3
Direction
increasee3
Value
1.5%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The presence of eucalyptus forest promoted a 1.5% increase in soil moisture in the corn crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1422 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil management with cover crops may not increase soybean and corn productivity as expected.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
cover cropse4
Outcome
productivitye4
Direction
not increasee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Soil management systems, such as irrigation, use cover crops, which may not increase the productivity of soybean and corn crops as expected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1563 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 264 positive, 79 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 264 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.