Paper · 2022 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Zinc uptake and yield of wheat as influenced by zinc fertilizer in Central Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam, India

T.P. Saikia; A.S.N. Zaman; P.K. Bordoloi; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at AAU-Regional Agricultural Research Station, Shillongani, Nagaon, Assam during 2014–15 to 2016–17 rabi season to evaluate the Zn uptake and yield of wheat (variety CBW 38) in response to Zn-fertilization complemented with recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF). Zinc was applied as ZnSO4.7H2O to the soil at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 kg ha−1. The treatments were compared with foliar spray (0.5%) with or without soil application (10 kg ha−1) of Zn, both as ZnSO4.7H2O, RDF without Zn and %RDF-vermicompost (2 t ha−1) instant mixture (comlizer). The grain yield increased significantly with soil application of ZnSO4 up to 15 kg ha−1. The foliar spray of ZnSO4.7H2O (0.5%) alone was not effective, but the same combined with soil application significantly increased grain yield of wheat and was at par with ZnSO4.7H2O 15 kg ha−1. The highest Zn uptake by wheat was recorded with application of 15 kg ha−1 ZnSO4.7H2O, which also gave highest net economic return of wheat production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil ZnSO4 application up to 15 kg ha−1 significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Material
CBW 38e1
Treatment
soil application of ZnSO4 up to 15 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield increased significantly with soil application of ZnSO4 up to 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of wheat (variety CBW 38)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ZnSO4.7H2O spray alone was ineffective for wheat grain yield.

Treatment
foliar spray of ZnSO4.7H2O (0.5%) alonee0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate1
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar spray of ZnSO4.7H2O (0.5%) alone was not effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–719 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined foliar and soil ZnSO4.7H2O application significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
foliar spray of ZnSO4.7H2O (0.5%)e1
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
combined with soil applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same combined with soil application significantly increased grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–809 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar spray of ZnSO4.7H2O (0.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application produced grain yield at par with 15 kg ha−1 soil ZnSO4.7H2O.

Treatment
combined with soil applicatione1
Outcome
grain yield of wheate1
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
ZnSO4.7H2O 15 kg ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“was at par with ZnSO4.7H2O 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“the same combined with soil application significantly increased grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–809 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 15 kg ha−1 ZnSO4.7H2O yielded the highest wheat zinc uptake.

Treatment
application of 15 kg ha−1 ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest Zn uptake by wheat was recorded with application of 15 kg ha−1 ZnSO4.7H2O”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 15 kg ha−1 ZnSO4.7H2O yielded the highest net economic return from wheat production.

Treatment
application of 15 kg ha−1 ZnSO4.7H2Oe0
Outcome
net economic return of wheat productione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 15 kg ha−1 ZnSO4.7H2O, which also gave highest net economic return of wheat production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1003 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc sulfate heptahydrate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate heptahydrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.