Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Soil ZnSO4 application up to 15 kg ha−1 significantly increased wheat grain yield.

A claim from Zinc uptake and yield of wheat as influenced by zinc fertilizer in Central Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam, India · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil ZnSO4 application up to 15 kg ha−1 significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Material
CBW 38e1
Treatment
soil application of ZnSO4 up to 15 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield increased significantly with soil application of ZnSO4 up to 15 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–656
e1

“yield of wheat (variety CBW 38)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–204

Title

Zinc uptake and yield of wheat as influenced by zinc fertilizer in Central Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam, India

T.P. Saikia; A.S.N. Zaman; P.K. Bordoloi; et al. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 2022. doi:10.5958/2455-7145.2022.00028.5

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2e5f567d1cf1d1fa07e91eacdf0768d6b521536236f5ed102c1abe29d693783f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this claim · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

868 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.