Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Animal Science

Performance of food–feed maize and cowpea cultivars under monoculture and intercropping systems: Grain yield, fodder biomass, and nutritive value

Abroulaye Sanfo; Nouhoun Zampaligré; Abalo E. Kulo; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Livestock feeding in Burkina Faso is characterized by a recurrent deficit in both the quality and the quantity of fodder during the dry season, which affects animal performance. To overcome this, quality fodder/forage production is an alternative. Therefore, this study evaluated food- and feed-improved cultivars of maize and cowpea in intercropping trials using the “mother and baby trials” approach with crop–livestock farmers. The mother trial comprised a randomized block design with eight treatments and four replicates: two cowpea (KVx745-11P and Tiligré) and two maize cultivars (Barka and Espoir), and grown under two cropping systems (monoculture and intercropping). Baby trials were established on-farm and involved 30 farmers during two seasons (2019 and 2020) in four villages in the South Sudan zone of Burkina Faso. Data were collected on (1) weed density and biomass, (2) grain yield and fodder biomass, (3) intercropping efficiency, and (4) fodder nutritive value. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and the least significant difference (LSD) means separation at a 5% threshold. The results revealed that maize and cowpea intercropping significantly reduced weed biomass ( p ≤ 0.05). In monoculture, the maize cultivar Barka produced a greater grain yield (4980 kg/ha) and fodder biomass [6259 kg dry matter (DM)/ha] than the cultivar Espoir, which produced a grain yield of 2581 kg/ha and fodder biomass of 4952 kg DM/ha. The cowpea cultivars, KVx745-11P and Tiligré, were similar ( p ≥ 0.05) in terms of fodder biomass (2435–2820 kg DM/ha) and grain yield (1152–1163 kg/ha). For the intercropping system, land equivalent ratios for fodder biomass (1.18:1.41) and grain yield (1.02:1.44) were greater than 1; intercropping also had better productivity system indexes than the monoculture cropping system. The crude protein concentration of fodder was greater for Barka maize (9.5%–9.8%) than for Espoir maize (8.5%–8.7%). The crude protein concentration was greater for cowpea KVx745-11P (19%–21.8%) than for cowpea Tiligré (15%–17%). Intercropping both Barka maize and cowpea KVx745-11P was the most productive cropping system for maximizing grain and fodder production for crop–livestock farmers in the South Sudan zone of Burkina Faso.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly reduced weed biomass.

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize and cowpea intercropping significantly reduced weed biomass ( p ≤ 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barka maize grain yield exceeded Espoir, 4980 versus 2581 kg/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Barkae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
4980 kg/hae0
Qualifier
2581 kg/hae0
Comparator
Espoire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize cultivar Barka produced a greater grain yield (4980 kg/ha) and fodder biomass [6259 kg dry matter (DM)/ha] than the cultivar Espoir, which produced a grain yield of 2581 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barka maize fodder biomass exceeded Espoir, 6259 versus 4952 kg DM/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Barkae0
Outcome
fodder biomasse0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
6259 kg dry matter (DM)/hae0
Qualifier
4952 kg DM/hae0
Comparator
Espoire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize cultivar Barka produced a greater grain yield (4980 kg/ha) and fodder biomass [6259 kg dry matter (DM)/ha] than the cultivar Espoir, which produced a grain yield of 2581 kg/ha and fodder biomass of 4952 kg DM/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea cultivars had statistically similar fodder biomass.

Material
KVx745-11Pe0
Outcome
fodder biomasse0
Direction
similare0
Value
2435–2820 kg DM/hae0
Comparator
Tiligrée0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea cultivars, KVx745-11P and Tiligré, were similar ( p ≥ 0.05) in terms of fodder biomass (2435–2820 kg DM/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea cultivars had statistically similar grain yield.

Material
KVx745-11Pe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
1152–1163 kg/hae0
Comparator
Tiligrée0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea cultivars, KVx745-11P and Tiligré, were similar ( p ≥ 0.05) in terms of fodder biomass (2435–2820 kg DM/ha) and grain yield (1152–1163 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1588 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fodder biomass land equivalent ratio exceeded one under intercropping.

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayst0
Outcome
land equivalent ratios for fodder biomasse0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
1.18:1.41e0
Comparator
1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“land equivalent ratios for fodder biomass (1.18:1.41) and grain yield (1.02:1.44) were greater than 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain yield land equivalent ratio exceeded one under intercropping.

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayst0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
1.02:1.44e0
Comparator
1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“land equivalent ratios for fodder biomass (1.18:1.41) and grain yield (1.02:1.44) were greater than 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1721 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping had better productivity indexes than monoculture.

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayst0
Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
productivity system indexese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
monoculture cropping systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping also had better productivity system indexes than the monoculture cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1817 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barka maize fodder had more crude protein than Espoir maize fodder.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Barkae0
Outcome
crude protein concentration of foddere0
Direction
greatere0
Value
9.5%–9.8%e0
Qualifier
8.5%–8.7%e0
Comparator
Espoire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude protein concentration of fodder was greater for Barka maize (9.5%–9.8%) than for Espoir maize (8.5%–8.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1934 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KVx745-11P cowpea fodder had more crude protein than Tiligré.

Material
KVx745-11Pe0
Outcome
crude protein concentratione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
19%–21.8%e0
Qualifier
15%–17%e0
Comparator
Tiligrée0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crude protein concentration was greater for cowpea KVx745-11P (19%–21.8%) than for cowpea Tiligré (15%–17%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2047 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barka maize intercropped with KVx745-11P cowpea was most productive for grain and fodder.

Taxon
maize and cowpeaVigna unguiculataZea mayst0
Material
Barka maize and cowpea KVx745-11Pe0
Treatment
Intercroppinge0
Outcome
grain and fodder productione0
Direction
most productivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping both Barka maize and cowpea KVx745-11P was the most productive cropping system for maximizing grain and fodder production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2049–2184 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–51 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

intercropping · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

834 papers: 613 positive, 221 negative or no effect

612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

830 papers more in this group

See all 834 papers →

intercropping · weed · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.