Paper · 2022 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of endophytic bacterial consortium isolated from tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) roots on growth and yield of Phaseolus vulgaris L.

R. Nath; D. Tamuly; G.D. Sharma; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper deals with the isolation of endophytic bacteria from roots of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) shrubs of upper Assam, India, and evaluates their potential for promoting plant growth in-vitro. Out of forty bacterial isolates, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus flexus, Pseudomonas sp., and Pseudomonas rhodesiae were most effective in mineral solubilization and plant growth-promoting hormone production. Pseudomonas sp. showed the highest indole acetic acid (IAA, 16.75 ± 0.04 μg/m) production, gibberellic acid (GA3, 4.12± 0.11 μg/ml) production, and potassium solubilization index (2.70 ± 0.05). Bacillus cereus was the highest phosphate (174.33±2.0 μg/ml) and zinc solubilizer (solubilization index 2.35± 0.01and 2.53 ±0.02 for ZnO and ZnS respectively). Siderophore activity was the highest in P. rhodesiae (87.37 ± 0.73%). All the isolates mentioned above were active against test plant pathogens Alternaria sp., Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Fusarium solani. Inoculation of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus flexus, Pseudomonas sp., and Pseudomonas rhodesiae to the soil in pot culture of Phaseolus vulgaris showed significant promotion of plant growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus cereus, Bacillus flexus, Pseudomonas sp. and P. rhodesiae promoted bean growth and yield after soil inoculation.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
Inoculation of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus flexus, Pseudomonas sp., and Pseudomonas rhodesiaee0
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth and yielde0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Bacillus cereus, Bacillus flexus, Pseudomonas sp., and Pseudomonas rhodesiae to the soil in pot culture of Phaseolus vulgaris showed significant promotion of plant growth and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The four selected endophytes showed activity against four test plant pathogens.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Interactor
Alternaria sp.Alternariae0pathogen
Outcome
active against test plant pathogense0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the isolates mentioned above were active against test plant pathogens Alternaria sp., Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Fusarium solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–94 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.