Paper · 2017 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Influence of Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and Fungi Mycorrhiza on Some Traits of Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under Drought Stress

Ebrahim Abbasi Seyahjani; Mehrdad Yarnia; Farhad Faravash; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

To investigate the effect of three types of organic fertilizers on some characteristics of bean (Goli cv.) under water deficit stress an experiment was conducted as split plot as randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications in Tabriz during 2014 in Research Farm of Islamic Azad University of Tabriz. Irrigation levels were: irrigation after 70, 110 and 150 mm evaporation from class A pan and bio-manure in seven levels: Rhizobium (Legominosarrum biovar phaseoli), mycorrhiza (Glomus mosseae), Pseudomonas (fluorescens), Rhizobium+mycorrhiza, Rhizobium+Pseudomonas, Rhizobium+Pseudomonas+mycorrhiza and control were assigned to main plots and sub plots, respectively. The results showed that all traits except the number of stomata on addaxial, abbaxial, cell membrane stability was higher in irrigation after 70 mm evaporation than other irrigation levels. Irrigation after 110 and 150 mm evaporation from pan reduced grain yield as 38.08% and 73.37%, respectively compared to the control. Treatment of Pseudomonas+ Rhizobium + mycorrhizae had higher yield (2401.1 kg.ha-1) compared other treatments except Rhizobium and mycorrhizae. Interaction of water stress and bio-manure was significant for chlorophyll content index, number of stomata on abbaxial and addaxial levels of leaves, cell membrane stability, leaf area index, harvest index, and the average number of seed per plant. Based on this research, bio fertilizer consumption increased all attributes compared to control, and combined use of bio-fertilizers also showed a higher impact than single use of them

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most measured bean traits were higher with irrigation after 70 mm evaporation than at other levels, with stated exceptions.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
irrigation after 70 mm evaporatione0
Outcome
all traits except the number of stomata on addaxial, abbaxial, cell membrane stabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other irrigation levelse0

Verbatim

e0

“all traits except the number of stomata on addaxial, abbaxial, cell membrane stability was higher in irrigation after 70 mm evaporation than other irrigation levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation after 110 mm evaporation reduced bean grain yield by 38.08% versus control.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Irrigation after 110e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38.08%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation after 110 and 150 mm evaporation from pan reduced grain yield as 38.08% and 73.37%, respectively compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation after 150 mm evaporation reduced bean grain yield by 73.37% versus control.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
150 mm evaporation from pane0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
73.37%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation after 110 and 150 mm evaporation from pan reduced grain yield as 38.08% and 73.37%, respectively compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Pseudomonas, Rhizobium and mycorrhizae produced 2401.1 kg.ha-1 yield, above other treatments except Rhizobium and mycorrhizae.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
Pseudomonas+ Rhizobium + mycorrhizaee0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2401.1 kg.ha-1e0
Qualifier
mycorrhizaee0
Comparator
other treatments except Rhizobium and mycorrhizaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of Pseudomonas+ Rhizobium + mycorrhizae had higher yield (2401.1 kg.ha-1) compared other treatments except Rhizobium and mycorrhizae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress and bio-manure interacted significantly for chlorophyll content index and stomatal counts.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
water stress and bio-manuree0
Outcome
chlorophyll content index, number of stomata on abbaxial and addaxial levels of leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of water stress and bio-manure was significant for chlorophyll content index, number of stomata on abbaxial and addaxial levels of leaves, cell membrane stability, leaf area index, harvest index, and the average number of seed per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress and bio-manure interacted significantly for membrane stability and leaf area index.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
water stress and bio-manuree0
Outcome
cell membrane stability, leaf area indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of water stress and bio-manure was significant for chlorophyll content index, number of stomata on abbaxial and addaxial levels of leaves, cell membrane stability, leaf area index, harvest index, and the average number of seed per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress and bio-manure interacted significantly for harvest index and seeds per plant.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
water stress and bio-manuree0
Outcome
harvest index, and the average number of seed per plante0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of water stress and bio-manure was significant for chlorophyll content index, number of stomata on abbaxial and addaxial levels of leaves, cell membrane stability, leaf area index, harvest index, and the average number of seed per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer use increased all attributes versus control.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
bio fertilizer consumptione0
Outcome
all attributese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“bio fertilizer consumption increased all attributes compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biofertilizers had a higher impact than single use.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
combined use of bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
higher impacte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
single use of theme0

Verbatim

e0

“combined use of bio-fertilizers also showed a higher impact than single use of them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–108 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Pseudomonas · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

irrigation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 87 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.