Paper · 2018 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Influence of bio-inoculant mediated organic nutrient management on productivity and profitability of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) in a semi-arid agro-ecology

GAURENDRA GUPTA; SHIVA DHAR; ANCHAL DASS; et al.

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at ICAR‒Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi during kharif season of 2016 and 2017 to study the influence of bio-inoculants (BI) mediated nutrient management on yield attributes, yields and economics of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Experiment was conducted in randomized block design (RDB) with three replications consisting of nine nutrient management treatments, viz. Control, RDF (30: 60:40 NPK), RDF + Bio-inoculant (BI), Vermicompost-VC (5 t/ha), FYM (5 t/ha), Leaf compost-LC (5 t/ha), VC + BI, FYM + BI and LC + BI. Rhizobium leguminosarum, PSB (Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas striata, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus megaterium) and potassium solubilizers (Bacillus mucilagenosus and Frateuria aurantia) were used as bio-inoculants for seed treatment. Results indicate that BI mediated nutrient management significantly increased the pods/plant. Combined effect of inoculation and organic sources of nutrients was significantly higher while inoculation with RDF remained non-significant over sole organic sources of nutrients as well as RDF. Application of FYM with BI produced highest pods/plant, grains/pod and test weight. Application of FYM with BI produced highest seed (1.6; 1.7 t/ha), stover (6.33; 6.5 t/ha) and biological yields (7.93, 8.22 t/ha) respectively during 1st and 2nd year which was at par with yield under plots applied with vermicompost and BI. Gross returns, net returns and B: C were significantly affected by the treatments. Application of FYM with BI gave higher gross returns, net returns and B: C. Overall, Significantly higher pigeonpea productivity and profitability was achieved with organic nutrient source + BI over their sole application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-inoculant mediated nutrient management significantly increased pods per plant.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
BI mediated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
pods/plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BI mediated nutrient management significantly increased the pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–901 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation combined with organic nutrient sources yielded significantly more pods per plant than sole organic sources.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment
inoculation and organic sources of nutrientse0
Outcome
pods/plante1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole organic sources of nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined effect of inoculation and organic sources of nutrients was significantly higher while inoculation with RDF remained non-significant over sole organic sources of nutrients as well as RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased the pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–901 · show in text ↑
e2

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with RDF did not significantly improve pods per plant over sole sources or RDF.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment
inoculation with RDFe0
Outcome
pods/plante1
Comparator
sole organic sources of nutrients as well as RDFe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with RDF remained non-significant over sole organic sources of nutrients as well as RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased the pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–901 · show in text ↑
e2

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with bio-inoculant gave the highest pods per plant, grains per pod and test weight.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
FYM with BIe0
Outcome
pods/plant, grains/pod and test weighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM with BI produced highest pods/plant, grains/pod and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1181 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with bio-inoculant gave seed yield of 1.6 and 1.7 t/ha in years one and two.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
FYM with BIe0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.6; 1.7 t/hae0
Qualifier
during 1st and 2nd yeare0
Comparator
vermicompost and BIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM with BI produced highest seed (1.6; 1.7 t/ha), stover (6.33; 6.5 t/ha) and biological yields (7.93, 8.22 t/ha) respectively during 1st and 2nd year which was at par with yield under plots applied with vermicompost and BI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with bio-inoculant gave stover yield of 6.33 and 6.5 t/ha in years one and two.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
FYM with BIe0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.33; 6.5 t/hae0
Comparator
vermicompost and BIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM with BI produced highest seed (1.6; 1.7 t/ha), stover (6.33; 6.5 t/ha) and biological yields (7.93, 8.22 t/ha) respectively during 1st and 2nd year which was at par with yield under plots applied with vermicompost and BI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with bio-inoculant gave biological yield of 7.93 and 8.22 t/ha in years one and two.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
FYM with BIe0
Outcome
biological yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.93, 8.22 t/hae0
Comparator
vermicompost and BIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM with BI produced highest seed (1.6; 1.7 t/ha), stover (6.33; 6.5 t/ha) and biological yields (7.93, 8.22 t/ha) respectively during 1st and 2nd year which was at par with yield under plots applied with vermicompost and BI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1422 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly affected gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
the treatmentse0
Outcome
Gross returns, net returns and B: Ce0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gross returns, net returns and B: C were significantly affected by the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1505 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with bio-inoculant gave higher gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
FYM with BIe0
Outcome
gross returns, net returns and B: Ce0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM with BI gave higher gross returns, net returns and B: C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1581 · show in text ↑
e1

“pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic nutrient sources with bio-inoculant yielded significantly higher pigeonpea productivity and profitability than sole application.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
organic nutrient source + BIe0
Outcome
pigeonpea productivity and profitabilitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
their sole applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher pigeonpea productivity and profitability was achieved with organic nutrient source + BI over their sole application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1728 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.