Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Potential of desiccation-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in growth augmentation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought stress

Ajay Shankar; Vishal Prasad

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) yield and physiology are adversely affected due to limited water availability. However, desiccation-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (DT-PGPR) are potential candidates that can overcome the negative impacts of water stress. In the present study, a total of 164 rhizobacterial isolates were screened for desiccation tolerance up to −0.73 MPa osmotic pressure, of which five isolates exhibited growth and expression of plant growth properties under the influence of desiccation stress of −0.73 MPa. These five isolates were identified as Enterobacter cloacae BHUAS1, Bacillus cereus BHUAS2, Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS3, Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS4, and Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS5. All five isolates exhibited plant growth-promoting properties and production of exopolysaccharide (EPS) under the impact of desiccation stress. Furthermore, a pot experiment on wheat (variety HUW-234) inoculated with the isolates Enterobacter cloacae BHUAS1, Bacillus cereus BHUAS2, and Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS3 exhibited a positive influence on the growth of wheat under the condition of water stress. A significant improvement in plant height, root length, biomass, chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability index (MSI), leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugar, total phenol, proline, and total soluble protein, were recorded under limited water-induced drought stress in treated plants as compared with non-treated plants. Moreover, plants treated with Enterobacter cloacae BHUAS1, Bacillus cereus BHUAS2, and Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS3 depicted improvement in enzymatic activities of several antioxidant enzymes such as guaiacol peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). Beside this significant decrease in electrolyte leakage, H 2 O 2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents were also recorded in treated plants. From the results obtained, it is evident that E . cloacae BHUAS1, B . megaterium BHUIESDAS3, and B . cereus BHUAS2 are the potential DT-PGPR having the capability to sustain growth and yield, alleviating the deleterious effect of water stress in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five isolates grew and expressed growth promoting properties under desiccation.

Outcome
growth and expression of plant growth propertiese0
Qualifier
−0.73 MPae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five isolates exhibited growth and expression of plant growth properties under the influence of desiccation stress of −0.73 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–538 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five isolates produced exopolysaccharide under desiccation stress.

Outcome
production of exopolysaccharide (EPS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All five isolates exhibited plant growth-promoting properties and production of exopolysaccharide (EPS) under the impact of desiccation stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated wheat showed improved growth under water stress.

Material
variety HUW-234e0
Treatment
inoculated with the isolates Enterobacter cloacae BHUAS1, Bacillus cereus BHUAS2, and Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS3e0
Outcome
growth of wheate0
Direction
positive influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (variety HUW-234) inoculated with the isolates Enterobacter cloacae BHUAS1, Bacillus cereus BHUAS2, and Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS3 exhibited a positive influence on the growth of wheat under the condition of water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wheat improved in height, root length and biomass under drought.

Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
plant height, root length, biomasse0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in plant height, root length, biomass, chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability index (MSI), leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugar, total phenol, proline, and total soluble protein, were recorded under limited water-induced drought stress in treated plants as compared with non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wheat improved in chlorophyll, carotenoids and membrane stability.

Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability index (MSI)e0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in plant height, root length, biomass, chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability index (MSI), leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugar, total phenol, proline, and total soluble protein, were recorded under limited water-induced drought stress in treated plants as compared with non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wheat improved in relative water content and soluble sugar.

Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugare0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in plant height, root length, biomass, chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability index (MSI), leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugar, total phenol, proline, and total soluble protein, were recorded under limited water-induced drought stress in treated plants as compared with non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wheat improved in phenol, proline and soluble protein.

Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
total phenol, proline, and total soluble proteine0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
non-treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in plant height, root length, biomass, chlorophyll and carotenoid content, membrane stability index (MSI), leaf relative water content (RWC), total soluble sugar, total phenol, proline, and total soluble protein, were recorded under limited water-induced drought stress in treated plants as compared with non-treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated wheat improved antioxidant enzyme activity.

Treatment
treated with Enterobacter cloacae BHUAS1, Bacillus cereus BHUAS2, and Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS3e0
Outcome
enzymatic activitiese0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants treated with Enterobacter cloacae BHUAS1, Bacillus cereus BHUAS2, and Bacillus megaterium BHUIESDAS3 depicted improvement in enzymatic activities of several antioxidant enzymes such as guaiacol peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated wheat had decreased electrolyte leakage, hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde.

Treatment
treated plantse0
Outcome
electrolyte leakage, H 2 O 2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) contentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant decrease in electrolyte leakage, H 2 O 2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents were also recorded in treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1781–1905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑

Priestia megaterium · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Enterobacter cloacae · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus cereus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.