Paper · 2023 · Antioxidants

Phosphorus Availability Affects the Photosynthesis and Antioxidant System of Contrasting Low-P-Tolerant Cotton Genotypes

Mirezhatijiang Kayoumu; Asif Iqbal; Noor Muhammad; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
88
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is an essential macronutrient, and an important component of plant metabolism. However, little is known about the effects of low P availability on P absorption, the photosynthetic electron transport chain, and the antioxidant system in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes (sensitive FJA and DLNTDH and tolerant BX014 and LuYuan343) with contrasting low-P tolerance in a hydroponic experiment under 15 µM, 50 µM, and 500 μM P concentrations. The results showed that low P availability reduced plant development and leaf area, shoot length, and dry weight in FJA and DLNADH, compared to BX014 and LuYuan343. The low P availability decreased the gas-exchange parameters such as the net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance, and increased the intercellular CO2 concentration. Chlorophyll a fluorescence demonstrated that the leaves’ absorption and trapped-energy flux were largely steady. In contrast, considerable gains in absorption and trapped-energy flux per reaction center resulted from decreases in the electron transport per reaction center under low-P conditions. In addition, low P availability reduced the activities of antioxidant enzymes and increased the content of malondialdehyde in the cotton genotypes, especially in FJA and DLNTDH. Moreover, low P availability reduced the activity of PEPC and generated a decline in the content of ATP and NADPH. Our research can provide a theoretical physiological basis for the growth and tolerance of cotton under low-P conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P reduced development, leaf area, shoot length and dry weight more in sensitive cotton genotypes than tolerant genotypes.

Material
FJA and DLNADHe0
Treatment
low P availabilitye0
Outcome
plant development and leaf area, shoot length, and dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
BX014 and LuYuan343e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low P availability reduced plant development and leaf area, shoot length, and dry weight in FJA and DLNADH, compared to BX014 and LuYuan343”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–624 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P decreased net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance in cotton.

Treatment
low P availabilitye0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low P availability decreased the gas-exchange parameters such as the net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–768 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P increased intercellular CO2 concentration in cotton.

Treatment
low P availabilitye1
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the intercellular CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“The low P availability decreased the gas-exchange parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–686 · show in text ↑
e2

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton leaf absorption and trapped energy flux remained largely steady under low P.

Treatment
low-P conditionse1
Outcome
absorption and trapped-energy fluxe0
Direction
largely steadye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaves’ absorption and trapped-energy flux were largely steady”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–932 · show in text ↑
e1

“under low-P conditions. In addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1129 · show in text ↑
e2

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low P, absorption and trapped energy flux per reaction center gained in cotton.

Treatment
low-P conditionse0
Outcome
absorption and trapped-energy flux per reaction centere0
Direction
gainse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“considerable gains in absorption and trapped-energy flux per reaction center resulted from decreases in the electron transport per reaction center under low-P conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport per reaction center decreased under low P in cotton.

Treatment
low-P conditionse0
Outcome
electron transport per reaction centere0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreases in the electron transport per reaction center under low-P conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P reduced antioxidant enzyme activities in cotton, especially FJA and DLNTDH.

Material
FJA and DLNTDHe0
Treatment
low P availabilitye0
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low P availability reduced the activities of antioxidant enzymes and increased the content of malondialdehyde in the cotton genotypes, especially in FJA and DLNTDH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P increased malondialdehyde content in cotton, especially FJA and DLNTDH.

Material
FJA and DLNTDHe0
Treatment
low P availabilitye0
Outcome
content of malondialdehydee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low P availability reduced the activities of antioxidant enzymes and increased the content of malondialdehyde in the cotton genotypes, especially in FJA and DLNTDH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P reduced PEPC activity in cotton.

Treatment
low P availabilitye0
Gene
PEPCe0
Outcome
activity of PEPCe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low P availability reduced the activity of PEPC and generated a decline in the content of ATP and NADPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1409 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low P decreased ATP and NADPH content in cotton.

Treatment
low P availabilitye0
Outcome
content of ATP and NADPHe0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low P availability reduced the activity of PEPC and generated a decline in the content of ATP and NADPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1409 · show in text ↑
e1

“in cotton. This study used cotton genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–291 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

33 papers: 22 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.