Abstract
The study was conducted at the Faculty of Agriculture - Anbar University during the autumn season of 2016. The study included the effect of humic acid in some soil properties and the growth of squash with different saline water. The study included two salinity irrigation water and four levels of S0, S1, S2 and S3 salinity 1.1, 2, 3.8 and 5.6 dS m-1 and factor 2 addition of humic acid spray on plants at four levels F0, F1, F2 and F3 Spraying, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 g L-1. The results showed a decrease in dry weight and plant yield when irrigation with saline water, with a value of 0.00 at salinity of 5.6 dS m-1, Compared with fresh water use 16.72 g Plant -1 and -1.66 g Plant-1, Levels of humic acid spray increased significantly in dry weight as it increased from 8.74 g Plant -1, at the level of non-spraying to 12.44 g Plants -1, at the level of spraying 1.5 g L-1. Also increased the plant yield of 64.41 g. Plant -1 when compared to 111.06 g Plants -1 at the spraying level of 1.5 g L-1. The salinity of irrigation water caused differences in the concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the vegetative parts of the zucchini. The concentration of nitrogen increased from 2.075 mg N kg-1 to 2.225 mg N kg-1 while the concentration of phosphorus decreased by increasing salinity levels from 0.38 to 0.28 mg P Kg-1 potassium concentration decreased from 3.36 to 2.65 mg Kg-1. The concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased in vegetative parts of the plant by increasing the levels of the humic acid spraying by 1.11, 0.29 and 2.48 mg kg -1 respectively on the spraying level 1.5 g L-1 compared to the comparison treatment 1.11, 0. 19 and 1.10 mg kg-1 respectively. Increase the values of electrical conductivity in the soil after planting by increasing the salinity of irrigation water as it increased to 3.60 ds m-1 after it was 1.11. ds m-1 when irrigated with fresh water. However, the spraying of the humic acid caused the decrease in the values of the electrical conductivity as it decreased from 2.16 ds.m-1 when the comparison was compared to 2.16 ds.m-1 at the spraying level of 1.5 g L-1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight was lower under saline irrigation at 5.6 dS m-1 (0.00) than with fresh water (16.72 g per plant).
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e2“The results showed a decrease in dry weight and plant yield when irrigation with saline water, with a value of 0.00 at salinity of 5.6 dS m-1, Compared with fresh water use 16.72 g Plant -1 and -1.66 g Plant-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant yield decreased under saline irrigation at 5.6 dS m-1 compared with fresh water.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e2“The results showed a decrease in dry weight and plant yield when irrigation with saline water, with a value of 0.00 at salinity of 5.6 dS m-1, Compared with fresh water use 16.72 g Plant -1 and -1.66 g Plant-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid spray at 1.5 g L-1 significantly increased dry weight from 8.74 to 12.44 g per plant compared with non-spraying.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e3“Levels of humic acid spray increased significantly in dry weight as it increased from 8.74 g Plant -1, at the level of non-spraying to 12.44 g Plants -1, at the level of spraying 1.5 g L-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant yield increased with humic acid spraying at 1.5 g L-1 (64.41 g per plant, compared with 111.06 g as written in the abstract).
- Taxon
- squashe0
- Treatment
- spraying level of 1.5 g L-1e4
- Outcome
- plant yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Value
- 64.41 g. Plant -1e4
- Qualifier
- 111.06 g Plants -1e4
Not reportedComparator
Schema note from the model: abstract values are inconsistent: the increase is reported with 64.41 g and 111.06 g both attached
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e4“Also increased the plant yield of 64.41 g. Plant -1 when compared to 111.06 g Plants -1 at the spraying level of 1.5 g L-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf nitrogen concentration in squash increased from 2.075 to 2.225 mg N kg-1 with increasing salinity of irrigation water.
- Taxon
- squashe0
- Organ / stage
- vegetative partse5
- Treatment
- salinity of irrigation watere5
- Outcome
- concentration of nitrogene6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Value
- 2.075 mg N kg-1 to 2.225 mg N kg-1e6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e5“The salinity of irrigation water caused differences in the concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the vegetative parts of the zucchini”
e6“The concentration of nitrogen increased from 2.075 mg N kg-1 to 2.225 mg N kg-1 while the concentration of phosphorus decreased by increasing salinity levels from 0.38 to 0.28 mg P Kg-1 potassium concentration decreased from 3.36 to 2.65 mg Kg-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf phosphorus concentration in squash decreased from 0.38 to 0.28 mg P Kg-1 with increasing salinity levels.
- Taxon
- squashe0
- Organ / stage
- vegetative partse5
- Treatment
- increasing salinity levelse6
- Outcome
- concentration of phosphoruse6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 0.38 to 0.28 mg P Kg-1e6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e5“The salinity of irrigation water caused differences in the concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the vegetative parts of the zucchini”
e6“The concentration of nitrogen increased from 2.075 mg N kg-1 to 2.225 mg N kg-1 while the concentration of phosphorus decreased by increasing salinity levels from 0.38 to 0.28 mg P Kg-1 potassium concentration decreased from 3.36 to 2.65 mg Kg-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf potassium concentration in squash decreased from 3.36 to 2.65 mg Kg-1 with increasing salinity levels.
- Taxon
- squashe0
- Organ / stage
- vegetative partse5
- Treatment
- increasing salinity levelse6
- Outcome
- potassium concentratione6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 3.36 to 2.65 mg Kg-1e6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e5“The salinity of irrigation water caused differences in the concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the vegetative parts of the zucchini”
e6“The concentration of nitrogen increased from 2.075 mg N kg-1 to 2.225 mg N kg-1 while the concentration of phosphorus decreased by increasing salinity levels from 0.38 to 0.28 mg P Kg-1 potassium concentration decreased from 3.36 to 2.65 mg Kg-1”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid spraying at 1.5 g L-1 increased vegetative nitrogen concentration by 1.11 mg kg-1 compared with the comparison treatment.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e7“The concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased in vegetative parts of the plant by increasing the levels of the humic acid spraying by 1.11, 0.29 and 2.48 mg kg -1 respectively on the spraying level 1.5 g L-1 compared to the comparison treatment 1.11, 0. 19 and 1.10 mg kg-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid spraying at 1.5 g L-1 increased vegetative phosphorus by 0.29 mg kg-1 compared with the comparison treatment (0.19 mg kg-1).
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e7“The concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased in vegetative parts of the plant by increasing the levels of the humic acid spraying by 1.11, 0.29 and 2.48 mg kg -1 respectively on the spraying level 1.5 g L-1 compared to the comparison treatment 1.11, 0. 19 and 1.10 mg kg-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid spraying at 1.5 g L-1 increased vegetative potassium by 2.48 mg kg-1 compared with the comparison treatment (1.10 mg kg-1).
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e7“The concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium increased in vegetative parts of the plant by increasing the levels of the humic acid spraying by 1.11, 0.29 and 2.48 mg kg -1 respectively on the spraying level 1.5 g L-1 compared to the comparison treatment 1.11, 0. 19 and 1.10 mg kg-1 respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil electrical conductivity after planting increased to 3.60 ds m-1 with increasing salinity of irrigation water, compared with 1.11 ds m-1 under fresh water.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e1“Increase the values of electrical conductivity in the soil after planting by increasing the salinity of irrigation water as it increased to 3.60 ds m-1 after it was 1.11. ds m-1 when irrigated with fresh water”
Claim · model-written summary
Humic acid spraying decreased soil electrical conductivity to 2.16 ds m-1 relative to the comparison.
Verbatim
e0“the growth of squash with different saline water”
e2“the spraying of the humic acid caused the decrease in the values of the electrical conductivity as it decreased from 2.16 ds.m-1 when the comparison was compared to 2.16 ds.m-1 at the spraying level of 1.5 g L-1”
The same questions in other papers
application · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →application · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →salinity · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
other · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →salinity · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.