Paper · 2013 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

The Influence of Salinity on Seedling Growth of Some Pumpkin Varieties Used as Rootstock

Rana KURUM; Kamile ULUKAPI; Köksal AYDINŞAKİR; et al.

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In this study, the effects of different salinity levels (0, “control”, 2, 4, 8, and 12 dS m-1) on seedling growth of Obez, RS 841 and Ferro F1 pumpkin varieties, widely used around the world as rootstock, were investigated. Seedlings grown under saline conditions were investigated for plant main stem length, plant length, root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weights and ion concentrations (Ca++, K+, Na+) in the leaves of pumpkin varieties. The results revealed that root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weights tend to decrease when the electrical conductivity of the solution is increased. Results indicated that these varieties responded different to some investigated parameters under saline conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity tended to decrease root length, shoot length and root fresh weight of pumpkin seedlings relative to the control.

Taxon
pumpkine3
Treatment
different salinity levelse0
Outcome
root length, shoot length, root fresh weighte1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
tend toe1
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“different salinity levels (0, “control”, 2, 4, 8, and 12 dS m-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weights tend to decrease when the electrical conductivity of the solution is increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–708 · show in text ↑
e3

“Obez, RS 841 and Ferro F1 pumpkin varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity tended to decrease root dry weight, shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weight of pumpkin seedlings relative to the control.

Taxon
pumpkine3
Treatment
different salinity levelse0
Outcome
root dry weight, shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weightse1
Direction
decreasee1
Qualifier
tend toe1
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“different salinity levels (0, “control”, 2, 4, 8, and 12 dS m-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weights tend to decrease when the electrical conductivity of the solution is increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–708 · show in text ↑
e3

“Obez, RS 841 and Ferro F1 pumpkin varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three pumpkin varieties responded differently to saline conditions for some investigated parameters.

Taxon
pumpkine3
Material
Obez, RS 841 and Ferro F1e3
Treatment
saline conditionse2
Outcome
some investigated parameterse2
Qualifier
responded differente2

Verbatim

e2

“Results indicated that these varieties responded different to some investigated parameters under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–824 · show in text ↑
e3

“Obez, RS 841 and Ferro F1 pumpkin varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–160 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

15 papers: 0 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.