Paper · 2023 · Nematology

Endophytic fungi improve management of the burrowing nematode in banana (Musa spp.) through enhanced expression of defence-related genes

James Kisaakye; Hendrika Fourie; Danny Coyne; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary The root-burrowing nematode, Radopholus similis , is reputedly the most damaging nematode pest of banana and responsible for major production losses. In this study, the endophytic potential of 13 fungal isolates was assessed for the management of R. similis in East African Highland bananas (‘Ng’ombe’). All isolates successfully colonised tissue-cultured banana roots, with isolates from Trichoderma , Fusarium and Hypocrea producing the highest (⩾49.1%) and Beauveria isolates the lowest (⩽14.4%) colonisation. The fungal endophytes T. asperellum (ICIPE 700) and H. lixii (ICIPE 697) were the most effective in reducing R. similis densities (>81%) relative to the non-inoculated control. However, the combined inoculation of ICIPE 700 and ICIPE 697 led to greater suppression of R. similis (>21%) relative to individual inoculation. Suppression of R. similis following inoculation of banana roots with ICIPE 700 and/or ICIPE 697 was associated with the significant upregulation of the defence-related gene PR-1 , the cell signalling gene calmodulin Ca 2+ and the cell-wall-strengthening gene β-1 , 3-glucan synthase . This study demonstrates the potential for nematode management in bananas with fungal endophytes, especially using the isolates ICIPE 700 and ICIPE 697 when combined.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All 13 fungal isolates colonized tissue-cultured banana roots.

Taxon
bananae0
Interactor
isolatese0symbiont
Outcome
colonised tissue-cultured banana rootse0

Verbatim

e0

“All isolates successfully colonised tissue-cultured banana roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma, Fusarium and Hypocrea isolates had the highest banana root colonization, at least 49.1%.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
TrichodermaTrichodermae0symbiont
Outcome
colonisatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
⩾49.1%e0
Qualifier
Fusarium and Hypocreae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma
Trichoderma · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolates from Trichoderma , Fusarium and Hypocrea producing the highest (⩾49.1%) and Beauveria isolates the lowest (⩽14.4%) colonisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria isolates had the lowest banana root colonization, at most 14.4%.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
BeauveriaBeauveriae0symbiont
Outcome
colonisatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
⩽14.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beauveria
Beauveria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Stefan Jaronski · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beauveria isolates the lowest (⩽14.4%) colonisation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. asperellum ICIPE 700 reduced R. similis density by more than 81% versus no inoculation.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
T. asperellum (ICIPE 700)e0
Interactor
R. similisRadopholus similise0pest
Second interactor
T. asperellum (ICIPE 700)Trichoderma asperellume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
R. similis densitiese0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
>81%e0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radopholus similis
Radopholus similis · InteractorFlorida Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma asperellum
Trichoderma asperellum · Second interactorTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungal endophytes T. asperellum (ICIPE 700) and H. lixii (ICIPE 697) were the most effective in reducing R. similis densities (>81%) relative to the non-inoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H. lixii ICIPE 697 reduced R. similis density by more than 81% versus no inoculation.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
H. lixii (ICIPE 697)e0
Interactor
R. similisRadopholus similise0pest
Second interactor
H. lixii (ICIPE 697)e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
R. similis densitiese0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
>81%e0
Comparator
non-inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radopholus similis
Radopholus similis · InteractorFlorida Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fungal endophytes T. asperellum (ICIPE 700) and H. lixii (ICIPE 697) were the most effective in reducing R. similis densities (>81%) relative to the non-inoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined ICIPE 700 and ICIPE 697 inoculation suppressed R. similis over 21% more than individual inoculation.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
combined inoculation of ICIPE 700 and ICIPE 697e0
Interactor
R. similisRadopholus similise0pest
Second interactor
ICIPE 700 and ICIPE 697e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
suppression of R. similise0
Direction
greatere0
Value
>21%e0
Comparator
individual inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radopholus similis
Radopholus similis · InteractorFlorida Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined inoculation of ICIPE 700 and ICIPE 697 led to greater suppression of R. similis (>21%) relative to individual inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode suppression after isolate inoculation was associated with significant upregulation of PR-1.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
inoculation of banana roots with ICIPE 700 and/or ICIPE 697e0
Interactor
R. similisRadopholus similise0pest
Gene
PR-1e0
Outcome
upregulation of the defence-related gene PR-1e0
Direction
upregulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Radopholus similis
Radopholus similis · InteractorFlorida Division of Plant Industry Archive, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Suppression of R. similis following inoculation of banana roots with ICIPE 700 and/or ICIPE 697 was associated with the significant upregulation of the defence-related gene PR-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1020 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode suppression after isolate inoculation was associated with significant upregulation of calmodulin Ca 2+.

Taxon
bananat0
Gene
calmodulin Ca 2+e0
Outcome
upregulation of the defence-related gene PR-1 , the cell signalling gene calmodulin Ca 2+e0
Direction
upregulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the significant upregulation of the defence-related gene PR-1 , the cell signalling gene calmodulin Ca 2+ and the cell-wall-strengthening gene β-1 , 3-glucan synthase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode suppression after isolate inoculation was associated with significant upregulation of β-1,3-glucan synthase.

Taxon
bananat0
Gene
β-1 , 3-glucan synthasee0
Outcome
upregulation of the defence-related gene PR-1 , the cell signalling gene calmodulin Ca 2+ and the cell-wall-strengthening gene β-1 , 3-glucan synthasee0
Direction
upregulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the significant upregulation of the defence-related gene PR-1 , the cell signalling gene calmodulin Ca 2+ and the cell-wall-strengthening gene β-1 , 3-glucan synthase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1125 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Radopholus similis · MusaPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.