Paper · 2023 · Horticulture Research

Integrated model simulates bigger, sweeter tomatoes under changing climate under reduced nitrogen and water input

Huiping Zhou; Shaozhong Kang; Michel Génard; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract When simulating the response of fruit growth and quality to environmental factors and cultivation practices, the interactions between the mother plant and fruit need to be considered as a whole system. Here, we developed the integrative Tomato plant and fruit Growth and Fruit Sugar metabolism (TGFS) model by coupling equations describing the biophysical processes of leaf gas exchange, water transport, carbon allocation, organ growth and fruit sugar metabolism. The model also accounts for effects of soil nitrogen and atmospheric CO2 concentration on gaseous exchange of water and carbon by the leaf. With different nitrogen and water input values, TGFS performed well at simulating the dry mass of the tomato leaf, stem, root, and fruit, and the concentrations of soluble sugar and starch in fruit. TGFS simulations showed that increasing air temperature and CO2 concentration has positive effects on fruit growth, but not on sugar concentrations. Further model-based analyses of cultivation scenarios suggest that, in the context of climate change, decreasing N by 15%–25% and decreasing irrigation by 10%–20% relative to current levels would increase tomato fresh weight by 27.8%–36.4% while increasing soluble sugar concentration by up to 10%. TGFS provides a promising tool to optimise N and water inputs for sustainable high-quality tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The TGFS model performed well at simulating tomato organ dry mass and fruit soluble sugar and starch concentrations under different nitrogen and water inputs.

Outcome
dry masse1
Value
performed welle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“With different nitrogen and water input values, TGFS performed well at simulating the dry mass of the tomato leaf, stem, root, and fruit, and the concentrations of soluble sugar and starch in fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated increasing air temperature and CO2 concentration had a positive effect on tomato fruit growth.

Treatment
increasing air temperature and CO2 concentratione2
Outcome
fruit growthe2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
e2

“increasing air temperature and CO2 concentration has positive effects on fruit growth, but not on sugar concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated increasing air temperature and CO2 concentration had no effect on tomato fruit sugar concentrations.

Treatment
increasing air temperature and CO2 concentratione2
Outcome
sugar concentrationse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–51 · show in text ↑
e2

“increasing air temperature and CO2 concentration has positive effects on fruit growth, but not on sugar concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

In the context of climate change, decreasing N by 15%–25% and irrigation by 10%–20% relative to current levels is projected to increase tomato fresh weight by 27.8%–36.4%.

Treatment
decreasing N by 15%–25% and decreasing irrigation by 10%–20% relative to current levelse3
Outcome
fresh weighte3
Direction
increasee3
Value
27.8%–36.4%e3
Qualifier
in the context of climate changee3
Comparator
current levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in the context of climate change, decreasing N by 15%–25% and decreasing irrigation by 10%–20% relative to current levels would increase tomato fresh weight by 27.8%–36.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The same reduced N and irrigation scenario is projected to increase tomato soluble sugar concentration by up to 10%.

Treatment
decreasing N by 15%–25% and decreasing irrigation by 10%–20% relative to current levelse3
Outcome
soluble sugar concentratione4
Direction
increasinge4
Value
up to 10%e4
Comparator
current levelse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“in the context of climate change, decreasing N by 15%–25% and decreasing irrigation by 10%–20% relative to current levels would increase tomato fresh weight by 27.8%–36.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1201 · show in text ↑
e4

“while increasing soluble sugar concentration by up to 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1259 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

co2 · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 59 positive, 16 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.