Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CO2 and PSB inoculation promoted root development and antioxidant abilities in tomato

A claim from Enhanced fruit yield and quality of tomato by photosynthetic bacteria and CO2 enrichment under reduced irrigation · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 and PSB inoculation promoted root development and antioxidant abilities in tomato

Organ / stage
roote2
Treatment
CO2 and PSB inoculatione2
Interactor
PSBe2symbiont
Outcome
root development and antioxidant abilitiese2
Direction
promotede2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“we have observed that CO2 and PSB inoculation promoted the root development and antioxidant abilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1406
t0

“Enhanced fruit yield and quality of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42

Title

Enhanced fruit yield and quality of tomato by photosynthetic bacteria and CO2 enrichment under reduced irrigation

Bin Du; M.K. Shukla; Xiaolin Yang; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2022. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108106

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e5e133fe25ed6b70db9d13a4a6fa95f2c9a74139ae463819980e7bf59912087f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

co2 · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 59 positive, 16 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Simulated increasing air temperature and CO2 concentration had a positive effect on tomato fruit growth.

    Integrated model simulates bigger, sweeter tomatoes under changing climate under reduced nitrogen and water input · 2023

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Carbon dioxide enrichment hardly affected LMA of producing tomato plants.

    Short and Long Term Fluctuations of the Leaf Mass Per Area of Tomato Plants—Implications for Growth Models · 1998

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Elevated CO2 plus chronic warming severely inhibited tomato plant growth, regardless of N form.

    Elevated CO2 plus chronic warming reduce nitrogen uptake and levels or activities of nitrogen‐uptake and ‐assimilatory proteins in tomato roots · 2016

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    With NH4(+)-fed tomato plants, elevated root-zone CO2 did not alter growth or total N.

    The influence of root assimilated inorganic carbon on nitrogen acquisition/assimilation and carbon partitioning · 2004

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Enrichment to 1600 μmol mol –1 gave no additional increase in shoot fresh mass, shoot dry mass or stem extension.

    Impact of Different Daily Light Integrals and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations on the Growth, Morphology, and Production Efficiency of Tomato Seedlings · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    At least 18% carbon dioxide reduced tomato growth after one week regardless of oxygen.

    The response of tomato plants to simulated landfill gas mixtures · 1985

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Prolonged root-zone CO2 treatment decreased root mineral uptake and transport and plant growth in tomato after 60 days.

    Effects of prolonged root-zone CO2 treatment on morphological parameter and nutrient uptake of tomato grown in aeroponic system · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Atmospheres enriched with carbon dioxide practically did not change the germination rate of tomato seeds.

    CARBON DIOXIDE IN RELATION TO GLASSHOUSE CROPS · 1926

    Opposite direction

66 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this claim · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    KL9 inoculation increased tomato shoot length by 34.6% over control.

    Enhancement of growth and yield of tomato by Rhodopseudomonas sp. under greenhouse conditions · 2008 · compared with control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    KL9 inoculation increased tomato seed germination percentage by 30.2% versus uninoculated control after seven days.

    Effects of application of Rhodopseudomonas sp. on seed germination and growth of tomato under axenic conditions. · 2007 · compared with uninoculated control

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. no effect
    AMF inoculation did not affect tomato dry matter or relative growth rate under fresh water irrigation.

    AMF Inoculation Enhances Growth and Improves the Nutrient Uptake Rates of Transplanted, Salt-Stressed Tomato Seedlings · 2015 · compared with fresh water-irrigation

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Soaking tomato seeds in bacterial isolates for 10 to 30 minutes did not change germination time or seedling growth.

    Activities Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus sp. to Stimulate Germination and Seedling Growth of Tomato Plants · 2016

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    PGPR application had no impact on fruit biomass.

    Impact of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculation and Grafting on Tolerance of Tomato to Combined Water and Nutrient Stress Assessed via Metabolomics Analysis · 2021

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Inoculation with Verticillium albo-atrum decreased tomato plant growth compared with non-inoculated controls, irrespective of mycorrhizal status.

    PLANT GROWTH RESPONSES TO VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA · 1983 · compared with non‐inoculated controls

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    FOL inoculation reduced tomato growth.

    Mycorrhizal fungi induced activation of tomato defense system mitigates Fusarium wilt stress · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    RS inoculation significantly inhibited tomato seedling growth.

    Compost Amendments Based on Vinegar Residue Promote Tomato Growth and Suppress Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ralstonia Solanacearum · 2020

    Opposite direction

432 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.