Paper · 2003 · JOURNAL OF TROPICAL FOREST SCIENCE

Growth, leaf gas exchange and production of biomass in coppiced and pollarded agroforestry tree species.

P. S. Thakur; Sandeep Sehgal

13
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

THAKUR, P. S. & SEHGAL, S. 2003. Growth, leaf gas exchange and production of biomass in coppiced and pollarded agroforestry tree species. Four coppicing or pollarding treatments (stems cut at heights of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 m) were applied to four tree species, aged five years old, in an agroforestry plantation. We measured growth, leaf gas exchange characteristics and foliage and branchwood biomass in four important fuel and fodder agroforestry tree species, namely, Grewia optiva, Celtis australis, Bauhinia variegata and Morus alba. Out of the four species, B. variegata transpired the most followed by M. alba, then C. australis and G. optiva. For G. optiva and M. alba, transpiration was higher from plants pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 m compared with plants pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 m. Photosynthetic rate was highest in M. alba and lowest in C. australis. In M. alba and G. optiva, higher rates of photosynthesis were observed in trees pollarded at 1.5 and 2.0 m. Water-use efficiency was higher in M. alba and G. optiva than in B. variegata and C. australis. Maximum leaf size was observed in B. variegata, followed by M. alba and G. optiva. Cutting height did not affect leaf size significantly. For M. alba and G. optiva, LAI was highest at cutting heights of 1.5 and 2.0 m. Coppicing and pollarding significantly affected the production of foliage and branchwood biomass. Fodder and fuelwood production from agroforestry plantations would be maximised by planting M. alba or G. optiva and pollarding annually at a height of 2.0 m.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bauhinia variegata transpired the most among the four agroforestry tree species.

Taxon
B. variegataBauhinia variegatae1
Outcome
transpiratione2
Direction
transpired the moste1
Setting
agroforestry plantatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bauhinia variegata
Bauhinia variegata · TaxonPeter1968 at English Wikipedia · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four coppicing or pollarding treatments (stems cut at heights of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 m) were applied to four tree species, aged five years old, in an agroforestry plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“Out of the four species, B. variegata transpired the most followed by M. alba, then C. australis and G. optiva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–651 · show in text ↑
e2

“For G. optiva and M. alba, transpiration was higher from plants pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 m compared with plants pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Grewia optiva, transpiration was higher in plants pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 m than in plants pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 m.

Taxon
G. optivaGrewia optivae2
Treatment
pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 me2
Outcome
transpiratione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 me2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Grewia optiva
Grewia optiva · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“For G. optiva and M. alba, transpiration was higher from plants pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 m compared with plants pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–803 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Morus alba, transpiration was higher in plants pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 m than in plants pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 m.

Taxon
M. albaMorus albae2
Treatment
pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 me2
Outcome
transpiratione2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 me2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“For G. optiva and M. alba, transpiration was higher from plants pollarded at 1.5 or 2.0 m compared with plants pollarded at 1.0 m or coppiced at 0.5 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–803 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate was highest in Morus alba.

Taxon
M. albaMorus albae3
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
C. australise3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Photosynthetic rate was highest in M. alba and lowest in C. australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–874 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate was lowest in Celtis australis.

Taxon
C. australisCeltis australise3
Outcome
Photosynthetic ratee3
Direction
loweste3
Comparator
M. albae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Celtis australis
Celtis australis · TaxonPhilmarin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Photosynthetic rate was highest in M. alba and lowest in C. australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–874 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency was higher in Morus alba than in Bauhinia variegata and Celtis australis.

Taxon
M. albaMorus albae4
Outcome
Water-use efficiencye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
B. variegata and C. australise4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Water-use efficiency was higher in M. alba and G. optiva than in B. variegata and C. australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1078 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-use efficiency was higher in Grewia optiva than in Bauhinia variegata and Celtis australis.

Taxon
G. optivaGrewia optivae4
Outcome
Water-use efficiencye4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
B. variegata and C. australise4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Grewia optiva
Grewia optiva · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Water-use efficiency was higher in M. alba and G. optiva than in B. variegata and C. australis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1078 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum leaf size was observed in Bauhinia variegata, followed by Morus alba and Grewia optiva.

Taxon
B. variegataBauhinia variegatae5
Outcome
leaf sizee5
Direction
Maximume5
Comparator
M. alba and G. optivae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bauhinia variegata
Bauhinia variegata · TaxonPeter1968 at English Wikipedia · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Maximum leaf size was observed in B. variegata, followed by M. alba and G. optiva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting height did not significantly affect leaf size.

Taxon
agroforestry tree speciest0
Treatment
Cutting heighte6
Outcome
leaf sizee6
Direction
did not affecte6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“coppiced and pollarded agroforestry tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–103 · show in text ↑
e6

“Cutting height did not affect leaf size significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1216 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Morus alba, LAI was highest at cutting heights of 1.5 and 2.0 m.

Taxon
M. albaMorus albae7
Treatment
cutting heights of 1.5 and 2.0 me7
Outcome
LAIe7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“For M. alba and G. optiva, LAI was highest at cutting heights of 1.5 and 2.0 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1296 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For Grewia optiva, LAI was highest at cutting heights of 1.5 and 2.0 m.

Taxon
G. optivaGrewia optivae7
Treatment
cutting heights of 1.5 and 2.0 me7
Outcome
LAIe7
Direction
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Grewia optiva
Grewia optiva · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“For M. alba and G. optiva, LAI was highest at cutting heights of 1.5 and 2.0 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coppicing and pollarding significantly affected the production of foliage and branchwood biomass.

Taxon
agroforestry tree speciest0
Treatment
Coppicing and pollardinge1
Outcome
production of foliage and branchwood biomasse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“coppiced and pollarded agroforestry tree species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Coppicing and pollarding significantly affected the production of foliage and branchwood biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1394 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder and fuelwood production would be maximised by planting Morus alba or Grewia optiva and pollarding annually at 2.0 m.

Taxon
M. alba or G. optivaMorus albaGrewia optivae1
Treatment
pollarding annually at a height of 2.0 me1
Outcome
Fodder and fuelwood productione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Morus alba
Morus alba · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Grewia optiva
Grewia optiva · TaxonForestowlet · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Fodder and fuelwood production from agroforestry plantations would be maximised by planting M. alba or G. optiva and pollarding annually at a height of 2.0 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1553 · show in text ↑