Paper · 2023 · Biotechnology Journal International

A Consortium of Soil Bacteria Mediates the Partial Replacement of Mineral Fertilizer for Sustainable Grapevine Cultivation in Sandy Soil

Thoraua S. Abo El-Wafa; Hanaa A. Abo-Koura; Mohamed E. Abdelaziz; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The demand for chemical fertilizers in agriculture has increased to deal with the present global population increase. However, the excessive use of chemical fertilizers can be reduced by applying biofertilizers as an eco-friendly tool. Plant growth-promoting rizobacteria (PGPR) has an essential need in terms of fertilizer savings and promoting plant yield. Here, we study the effect of using three (PGPR) bacterial strains “Bacillus nakamurai MSRH1, Bacillus pacificus MSRH3, Paenibacillus polymyxa MSRH5”, integrated with chemical fertilizers (40, 60, 80, 100% need based NPK) on vegetative growth, yield production, and quality of table grapes ‘Flam Seedless’ grown in sand soil during two successive seasons of 2020 and 2021, with a preliminary trial season in 2019. Our results show that amending grapes with NPK in combination with the consortium of three strains led to significant improvement in colonized vines compared to a single application of 100% NPK. Results showed that bacterial consortium combined with 80% and 60% NPK mineral fertilizer had more positive effects than un-inoculated vines in growth parameters, cluster characteristics, yield/vine and berry quality in the two growing seasons. Besides, N, P and K concentrations of leaf petiole, total leaf chlorophyll content, and carbohydrates in canes were significantly enhanced by bacteria consortium with 80% and 60% PK chemical fertilizers. PGPR significantly increased total bacterial count, N2-fixing, P- solubilizing and K-solubilizing bacteria in soil treated with the three strains of bacteria plus mineral fertilizer. In addition, dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere soil were also increased in treatments inoculated with strains plus mineral fertilizer. The field study results showed that PGPR approach has potential and can be considered as a crop management strategy to increase the yield and quality of grapes, reduce chemical fertilization and subsequent environmental pollution, and could be useful in terms of sustainable production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium and NPK significantly improved vines over full NPK alone.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
NPK in combination with the consortium of three strainse0
Outcome
colonized vinese0
Direction
improvemente0
Comparator
a single application of 100% NPKe0

Verbatim

e0

“amending grapes with NPK in combination with the consortium of three strains led to significant improvement in colonized vines compared to a single application of 100% NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium with reduced NPK improved growth, cluster characteristics, yield and berry quality.

Taxon
vinese0
Treatment
bacterial consortium combined with 80% and 60% NPK mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
growth parameters, cluster characteristics, yield/vinee0
Direction
more positivee0
Comparator
un-inoculated vinese0

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial consortium combined with 80% and 60% NPK mineral fertilizer had more positive effects than un-inoculated vines in growth parameters, cluster characteristics, yield/vine and berry quality in the two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Consortium and reduced fertilizer enhanced petiole nutrients, leaf chlorophyll and cane carbohydrates.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
bacteria consortium with 80% and 60% PK chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
N, P and K concentrations of leaf petiolee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“N, P and K concentrations of leaf petiole, total leaf chlorophyll content, and carbohydrates in canes were significantly enhanced by bacteria consortium with 80% and 60% PK chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR increased soil bacterial groups.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
three strains of bacteria plus mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
total bacterial count, N2-fixing, P- solubilizing and K-solubilizing bacteria in soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“PGPR significantly increased total bacterial count, N2-fixing, P- solubilizing and K-solubilizing bacteria in soil treated with the three strains of bacteria plus mineral fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased rhizosphere enzyme activities.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
inoculated with strains plus mineral fertilizere0
Outcome
dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“dehydrogenase and phosphatase activity in the rhizosphere soil were also increased in treatments inoculated with strains plus mineral fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1757 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR was recommended to improve grape production while reducing fertilizer.

Taxon
grapese0
Outcome
crop management strategy to increase the yield and quality of grapes, reduce chemical fertilizatione0

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR approach has potential and can be considered as a crop management strategy to increase the yield and quality of grapes, reduce chemical fertilization and subsequent environmental pollution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1794–1987 · show in text ↑

inoculation · soil: biology · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · VitisPositive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.