Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Effects of fertilizer reduction coupled with straw returning on soil fertility, wheat root endophytic bacteria, and the occurrence of wheat crown rot

Yajiao Wang; Yuxing Wu; Caiyun Cao; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
25
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Excessive fertilization is associated with nutrient loss, soil compaction, and weak plant resistance. Straw returning can increase soil fertility with a consequent reduction in fertilizer, but the effects of fertilizer reduction coupled with straw returning on crop endophytic microbes and crop disease are poorly understood. Therefore, using metagenomic sequencing methods we investigated the responses of soil fertility, diversity, the function of root endophytic bacteria, and the occurrence of wheat crown rot due to the application of fertilizer (no, moderate and excessive fertilizer) coupled with or without straw returning after 7 years of treatments. The results showed that, after excessive fertilization, the wheat crown rot became severe, registering a disease index of 23. Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%, and the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively, but the soil fertility was not significantly affected. In addition, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning changed the community structure of endophytic bacteria and increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen fixation-related genes by 4.72 and 9.32%, respectively. Our results indicated that fertilizer reduction coupled with straw returning reduced the occurrence of wheat crown rot, increased the diversity of endophytic bacteria, and changed the community structure and function of endophytic bacteria, which will provide a better understanding of the interaction of fertilization coupled with straw returning, endophytic bacteria and wheat crown rot.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess fertilization produced severe crown rot with disease index 23.

Treatment
excessive fertilizatione0
Outcome
wheat crown rote0
Direction
severee0
Value
23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after excessive fertilization, the wheat crown rot became severe, registering a disease index of 23.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization plus straw return reduced wheat crown rot disease index by 38.50%.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
38.50%e0
Comparator
excessive fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization plus straw return increased endophytic bacterial richness by 61.20%.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge1
Outcome
richnesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
61.20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat root endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate fertilization plus straw return increased endophytic bacterial diversity by 11.93%.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge1
Outcome
diversity of endophytic bacteriae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.93%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the richness and diversity of endophytic bacteria were increased by 61.20 and 11.93%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat root endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment did not significantly affect soil fertility.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge1
Outcome
soil fertilitye0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the soil fertility was not significantly affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1132 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat root endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment changed endophytic bacterial community structure.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge0
Outcome
community structure of endophytic bacteriae0
Direction
changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning changed the community structure of endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat root endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment increased abundance of carbohydrate metabolism genes by 4.72%.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge1
Outcome
relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolisme0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.72e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen fixation-related genes by 4.72 and 9.32%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1385 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat root endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment increased abundance of nitrogen fixation genes by 9.32%.

Treatment
moderate fertilization coupled with straw returninge1
Outcome
nitrogen fixation-related genese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased the relative abundance of carbohydrate metabolism and nitrogen fixation-related genes by 4.72 and 9.32%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1385 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with excessive fertilization, moderate fertilization coupled with straw returning significantly reduced the incidence of wheat crown rot, the disease index was reduced by 38.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat root endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–110 · show in text ↑

organic · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 53 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.