Paper · 2023 · Food Science and Technology

Influence of tillage methods on food security and its agrophysical and water-physical properties

Askar RZALIYEV; Valeria GOLOBORODKO; SHABDEN BEKMUHAMETOV; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To maintain the pace of the agriculture industry and assist bridge the gap between food supply and demand, best-implemented, sustainable, and optimal solutions are needed. Soil and water resources, research and development, extension, agricultural education, and related infrastructure development must be prioritized to boost food production and enhance soil and water management. Research has been carried out on the effect of various methods of main tillage - chiseling with various types of chisel rippers and moldboard plowing - on the agro- and water-physical parameters of light chestnut soil. Differences in soil density and moisture levels have influenced the development of corn plants. On the variants with deep chisel tillage, the accumulation of dry and raw plant biomass and the yield of corn grain were higher. Thus, the methods of main tillage allow to regulate the agro- and water-physical state of the soil and to have a significant effect on the productivity of plants. On the basis of the data obtained, for high-quality main tillage, providing optimal indicators of its density, crumbling, reserves of total and available moisture in the soil, it is possible to recommend the use of an experimental chisel ripper CR-2.4.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep chisel tillage increased dry and raw corn biomass.

Treatment
deep chisel tillagee0
Outcome
dry and raw plant biomasse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the variants with deep chisel tillage, the accumulation of dry and raw plant biomass and the yield of corn grain were higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“development of corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep chisel tillage increased corn grain yield.

Treatment
deep chisel tillagee0
Outcome
yield of corn graine0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the variants with deep chisel tillage, the accumulation of dry and raw plant biomass and the yield of corn grain were higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“development of corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–695 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil density and moisture differences influenced corn plant development.

Taxon
corn plantsZea mays subsp. mayse0
Outcome
development of corn plantse0
Qualifier
Differences in soil density and moisture levelse0

Not reportedTreatmentSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in soil density and moisture levels have influenced the development of corn plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–696 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend experimental chisel ripper CR-2.4 for high-quality main tillage.

Outcome
use of an experimental chisel ripper CR-2.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for high-quality main tillage, providing optimal indicators of its density, crumbling, reserves of total and available moisture in the soil, it is possible to recommend the use of an experimental chisel ripper CR-2.4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1241 · show in text ↑
e1

“development of corn plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–695 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.