Paper · 2023 · Horticulturae

Ethanol and Methyl Jasmonate Fumigation Impact on Quality, Antioxidant Capacity, and Phytochemical Content of Broccoli Florets during Storage

Arturo Duarte-Sierra; Minty Thomas; Joseph Arul

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Broccoli is a vegetable that offers valuable components, such as glucosinolates (GLS), flavonoids, and hydroxycinnamic acids (HCA), for our daily food intake. These substances have been associated with reducing the risk of cancer and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Broccoli florets are also highly perishable, given their elevated respiration rates and their sensitivity to ethylene. Experiments have been carried out on broccoli to investigate the consequences of abiotic stress post-harvest treatments in retarding the senescence process. Nevertheless, the influence of these treatments on the phytochemicals of broccoli has not been extensively examined. Florets of broccoli (Brassica oleracea) were exposed to an atmosphere consisting of 10,000 µL.L−1 ethanol at room temperature for 30 min and 120 min. The exposure to methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments was carried out at room temperature using 1 µL.L−1 for 45 min and 180 min. The yellowing of florets was delayed using 10,000 µL.L−1 of ethanol at both exposure times as compared to untreated florets, and the chlorophyll titers were also superior with both doses over the control. The total phenols of the florets increased by 15% and 18% with the application of the hormetic and high doses, respectively, throughout the storage period compared to unexposed broccoli. The GLS and HCA yields were also increased by both ethanol doses. The exposure of florets to 1 µL.L1 MeJA for 45 min resulted in delayed yellowing of florets; however, longer exposures resulted in yellowing after 21 d and significantly (p < 0.05) increased respiration rates relative to untreated florets. Overall antioxidant capacity of the florets was significantly reduced with both doses of methyl jasmonate; however, HCA titers were increased at both doses. The amount of total glucobrassicins within broccoli was increased following exposure of florets to both doses, but no significant differences in glucoraphanin content were observed. As a conclusion, the ethanol treatment could indeed delay senescence and lead to the induction of phytochemicals. In contrast, MeJA’s effect on quality is not quite substantial; it can, however, be used to improve the phytochemical content of florets, particularly indole-type GLS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol at both exposure times delayed floret yellowing relative to untreated broccoli.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
10,000 µL.L−1 of ethanole0
Outcome
yellowing of floretse0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
untreated floretse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The yellowing of florets was delayed using 10,000 µL.L−1 of ethanol at both exposure times as compared to untreated florets, and the chlorophyll titers were also superior with both doses over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanol at both exposure times raised chlorophyll titers over the control.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
10,000 µL.L−1 of ethanole0
Outcome
chlorophyll titerse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The yellowing of florets was delayed using 10,000 µL.L−1 of ethanol at both exposure times as compared to untreated florets, and the chlorophyll titers were also superior with both doses over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hormetic ethanol dose increased floret total phenols by 15% during storage.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
hormetice0
Outcome
total phenolse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
throughout the storage periode0
Comparator
unexposed broccolie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total phenols of the florets increased by 15% and 18% with the application of the hormetic and high doses, respectively, throughout the storage period compared to unexposed broccoli.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high ethanol dose increased floret total phenols by 18% during storage.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
highe0
Outcome
total phenolse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18%e0
Qualifier
throughout the storage periode0
Comparator
unexposed broccolie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total phenols of the florets increased by 15% and 18% with the application of the hormetic and high doses, respectively, throughout the storage period compared to unexposed broccoli.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both ethanol doses increased GLS and HCA yields.

Treatment
both ethanol dosese0
Outcome
GLS and HCA yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The GLS and HCA yields were also increased by both ethanol doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MeJA exposure for 45 minutes delayed floret yellowing.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
1 µL.L1 MeJA for 45 mine0
Outcome
yellowing of floretse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The exposure of florets to 1 µL.L1 MeJA for 45 min resulted in delayed yellowing of florets; however, longer exposures resulted in yellowing after 21 d and significantly (p < 0.05) increased respiration rates relative to untreated florets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1631 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer MeJA exposure resulted in floret yellowing after 21 days.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
longer exposurese0
Outcome
yellowinge0
Qualifier
after 21 de0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The exposure of florets to 1 µL.L1 MeJA for 45 min resulted in delayed yellowing of florets; however, longer exposures resulted in yellowing after 21 d and significantly (p < 0.05) increased respiration rates relative to untreated florets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer MeJA exposure significantly increased respiration rates relative to untreated florets.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
longer exposurese0
Outcome
respiration ratese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated floretse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The exposure of florets to 1 µL.L1 MeJA for 45 min resulted in delayed yellowing of florets; however, longer exposures resulted in yellowing after 21 d and significantly (p < 0.05) increased respiration rates relative to untreated florets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1631 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both methyl jasmonate doses significantly reduced overall floret antioxidant capacity.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
both doses of methyl jasmonatee0
Outcome
Overall antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Overall antioxidant capacity of the florets was significantly reduced with both doses of methyl jasmonate; however, HCA titers were increased at both doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both methyl jasmonate doses increased HCA titers.

Treatment
both doses of methyl jasmonatee0
Outcome
HCA titerse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Overall antioxidant capacity of the florets was significantly reduced with both doses of methyl jasmonate; however, HCA titers were increased at both doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both doses increased total glucobrassicins in broccoli florets.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
both dosese0
Outcome
total glucobrassicinse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of total glucobrassicins within broccoli was increased following exposure of florets to both doses, but no significant differences in glucoraphanin content were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucoraphanin content did not differ significantly following both doses.

Organ / stage
floretse0
Treatment
both dosese0
Outcome
glucoraphanin contente0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of total glucobrassicins within broccoli was increased following exposure of florets to both doses, but no significant differences in glucoraphanin content were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1970 · show in text ↑

(-)-methyl jasmonate · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

ethanol · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ethanol · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

(-)-methyl jasmonate · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ethanol · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.