Abstract
In-package slow-release SO2 generators installed in vented lugs of `Cardinal9 grapes and supplemented with SO2 gas fumigation controlled decay as well for 48 days of storage as did conventional weekly SO2 treatments, provided cooling was completed in 3 hours before a polyethylene bag closed the vents of the container. If combination generators with fast- and slow-release stages were used with no further SO2 treatment, decay control was just as effective even with 48 hours of cooling before the vents were closed. Stem freshness was significantly reduced with length of cooling period. A test with `Emperor9 grapes showed the same trends after storage for 103 days. Further, generators placed both above and below the packed fruit controlled decay significantly better than did a generator placed only on top.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
In-package slow-release SO2 generators controlled decay in Cardinal grapes over 48 days of storage as well as conventional weekly SO2 treatments, provided cooling was completed in 3 hours.
Verbatim
t0“Packaging and Decay-Control Systems for Storage and Transit of Table Grapes for Export”
e0“In-package slow-release SO2 generators installed in vented lugs of `Cardinal9 grapes and supplemented with SO2 gas fumigation controlled decay as well for 48 days of storage as did conventional weekly SO2 treatments, provided cooling was completed in 3 hours before a polyethylene bag closed the vents of the container”
Claim · model-written summary
Combination generators with fast- and slow-release stages, used without further SO2 treatment, gave decay control just as effective even with 48 hours of cooling.
- Taxon
- Table Grapest0
- Treatment
- combination generators with fast- and slow-release stagese1
- Outcome
- decay controle1
- Direction
- just as effectivee1
- Qualifier
- even with 48 hours of cooling before the vents were closede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Packaging and Decay-Control Systems for Storage and Transit of Table Grapes for Export”
e1“If combination generators with fast- and slow-release stages were used with no further SO2 treatment, decay control was just as effective even with 48 hours of cooling before the vents were closed”
Claim · model-written summary
Stem freshness of table grapes was reduced with longer cooling period.
Verbatim
t0“Packaging and Decay-Control Systems for Storage and Transit of Table Grapes for Export”
e2“Stem freshness was significantly reduced with length of cooling period”
Claim · model-written summary
On Emperor9 grapes, storage for 103 days showed the same trends as the Cardinal9 test.
Verbatim
e3“A test with `Emperor9 grapes showed the same trends after storage for 103 days”
Claim · model-written summary
Generators placed both above and below packed grapes controlled decay significantly better than a generator placed only on top.
Verbatim
t0“Packaging and Decay-Control Systems for Storage and Transit of Table Grapes for Export”
e4“Further, generators placed both above and below the packed fruit controlled decay significantly better than did a generator placed only on top”
The same questions in other papers
pollution · disease · VitisPositive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.