Abstract
Many reports highlight biological responses of crop plants after non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure based on the phenotypic and physiological levels. So, this study aimed to estimate genetic alterations in proteins, isozymes, and DNA banding patterns as well as the extent of nuclear DNA damage of economic corn (Zea mays) under the stress of EMR using accurate and reliable bioassays like sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), isozymes (Leucine- aminopeptidase, Esterases, Peroxidase, and Catalases), random amplified polymorphic DNA- polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR), and Comet Assay, respectively. SDS-PAGE analysis showed distinct polymorphisms (96.66%) between EMR exposed and non-exposed corn seedlings depending on the number and type of bands, their intensities as well as molecular weight which ranged from (60.27 to 192.35 kDa), gain, and loss of bands. The four isozymes generated varies isozymatic polymorphisms based on relative front, zymogram number, and optical intensities. RAPD analysis generated 85 amplified DNA products with high polymorphism values ranged from 90.91 to 100% based on primers, band type, DNA sizes which ranged from 153 to 1008-bp, lose, gain, and intensity of DNA bands. Comet Assay scored highest extent of loosed DNA from nuclei (DNA damage) reached the value of (tailed ratio 20%) at EMR exposed corn nuclei for 5 days compared to non-exposed nuclei which reached the value of (tailed ratio 3%). This study concluded that each EMR exposure time had unique interaction with proteins, isozymes, and DNA of corn cells exhibiting wide range of genotoxic stress and subsequently, adversely effect on growth and yield of this sensitive crop plants.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
EMR exposed seedlings had 96.66% protein band polymorphism against non-exposed seedlings.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- EMR exposede0
- Outcome
- polymorphismse0
- Value
- 96.66%e0
- Comparator
- non-exposed corn seedlingse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SDS-PAGE analysis showed distinct polymorphisms (96.66%) between EMR exposed and non-exposed corn seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Four isozymes showed varied polymorphisms.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- isozymatic polymorphismse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The four isozymes generated varies isozymatic polymorphisms based on relative front, zymogram number, and optical intensities.”
t0“corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
RAPD analysis identified 85 amplified products with 90.91 to 100% polymorphism.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Outcome
- polymorphism valuese0
- Value
- 90.91 to 100%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“RAPD analysis generated 85 amplified DNA products with high polymorphism values ranged from 90.91 to 100%”
t0“corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Exposed corn nuclei had 20% tailed DNA compared with 3% in unexposed nuclei.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- EMR exposede0
- Outcome
- DNA damagee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- tailed ratio 20%e0
- Comparator
- non-exposed nucleie0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Comet Assay scored highest extent of loosed DNA from nuclei (DNA damage) reached the value of (tailed ratio 20%) at EMR exposed corn nuclei for 5 days compared to non-exposed nuclei which reached the value of (tailed ratio 3%).”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · cytology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.