Paper · 2023 · Plant Health Progress

Effects of Disease Resistance and Fungicide Application on Management of Tar Spot on Corn in the North Central United States

Tiffanna J. Ross; Martin I. Chilvers; Adam M. Byrne; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tar spot, caused by Phyllachora maydis, is the most significant disease of corn in the North Central United States. Elucidating an integrated management approach to protect grain yield is a high priority. The integration of tillage, hybrid, and fungicide application on tar spot severity, canopy greenness, and grain yield was assessed in Indiana in 2019, 2020, and 2021. A split-plot arrangement of two tillage treatments as main plots with factorial arrangement of subplots with three hybrids (tar spot susceptible and two partially resistant) and fungicide application (propiconazole + benzovindiflupyr + azoxystrobin) were evaluated. Furthermore, a multistate study comparing two hybrids (susceptible and partially resistant) and fungicide application (propiconazole + benzovindiflupyr + azoxystrobin) was conducted in Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin in 2020. This research demonstrates that partially resistant hybrids with a standardized area under the disease progress curve of 2.5 and 3.0 had significantly less tar spot than a susceptible hybrid with a standardized area under the disease progress curve of 10.1 and increased canopy greenness ratings of 48.1 and 51.5%, which were significantly higher than the susceptible hybrid at 13.0% at maturity. Tar spot severity was further reduced and canopy greenness increased with a fungicide application in the susceptible hybrid. These results suggest that partial resistance alone may be used to manage tar spot. Yields did not differ significantly across hybrids with or without a fungicide application. However, a general trend of preserved yield potential was observed in the treatments with fungicide, indicating that knowledge of genetics and yield potential will be necessary to achieve the greatest benefit from partially resistant hybrids and judicious fungicide applications.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Partially resistant corn hybrids had significantly less tar spot than a susceptible hybrid.

Material
partially resistant hybridse0
Treatment
partially resistant hybridse0
Outcome
tar spote0
Direction
lesse0
Value
2.5 and 3.0e0
Comparator
a susceptible hybride0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partially resistant hybrids with a standardized area under the disease progress curve of 2.5 and 3.0 had significantly less tar spot than a susceptible hybrid with a standardized area under the disease progress curve of 10.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1121 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn in the North Central United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Partially resistant hybrids had 48.1% and 51.5% canopy greenness, significantly higher than 13.0% for the susceptible hybrid.

Treatment
partially resistant hybridse2
Outcome
canopy greenness ratingse0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.1 and 51.5%e0
Qualifier
13.0% at maturitye0
Comparator
susceptible hybride0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased canopy greenness ratings of 48.1 and 51.5%, which were significantly higher than the susceptible hybrid at 13.0% at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1260 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn in the North Central United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“partially resistant hybrids with a standardized area under the disease progress curve of 2.5 and 3.0 had significantly less tar spot than a susceptible hybrid with a standardized area under the disease progress curve of 10.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application increased canopy greenness in susceptible corn.

Material
susceptible hybride0
Treatment
fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
canopy greennesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tar spot severity was further reduced and canopy greenness increased with a fungicide application in the susceptible hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1385 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn in the North Central United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yields did not differ significantly among hybrids with or without fungicide.

Treatment
fungicide applicatione0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
did not differ significantlye0
Comparator
without a fungicide applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields did not differ significantly across hybrids with or without a fungicide application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1561 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn in the North Central United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments showed a general trend toward preserved yield potential.

Treatment
treatments with fungicidee0
Outcome
yield potentiale0
Direction
preservede0
Qualifier
general trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a general trend of preserved yield potential was observed in the treatments with fungicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1572–1662 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn in the North Central United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–114 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest partial resistance alone can manage tar spot.

Outcome
partial resistance alone may be used to manage tar spote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partial resistance alone may be used to manage tar spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1469 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn in the North Central United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–114 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors say genetics and yield potential knowledge is needed to maximize benefit from resistant hybrids and judicious fungicide.

Outcome
knowledge of genetics and yield potential will be necessarye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“knowledge of genetics and yield potential will be necessary to achieve the greatest benefit from partially resistant hybrids and judicious fungicide applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1841 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn in the North Central United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–114 · show in text ↑

fungicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

65 papers: 47 positive, 18 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

fungicide · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.