Paper · 2023 · PLANT ARCHIVES

THE IMPACT OF SEQUENTIAL APPLICATION OF PGR AND PGR+ NUTRIENT COMBINATION ON GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGICAL AND YIELD ATTRIBUTES OF SUGARCANE

Radha Jain; Anshu Singh; Priyanka Giri; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To study the impact of different PGR and PGR+ nutrient combinations on growth, physiological and yield attributes of sugarcane, three bud setts of variety, CoLk 94184 were primed with plant growth regulator (PGR), ethrel (@ 100 ppm) and nutrient, KCl (@0.2%) overnight and planted along with untreated control under field conditions in three replications at ICAR-IISR farm,, Lucknow in spring season . Planted sett buds were investigated for changes in reducing sugars content and SAI activity. Foliar application of ethrel and ethrel + nutrient mixture was performed in Set-I untreated control (no sett soaking ) with T1-T7 treatments; T1 -No spray (Control), T2 -ethrel spray @100 ppm (Spray 1), T3 -ethrel (100 ppm) + ZnSO 4 (0.5%) (Spray 2) at 60DAP, T4 -Spray 1 + GA3 spray @50 ppm (Spray 3), T5 -Spray 2 + GA3 (50 ppm) + CaCl 2 (1%) (Spray 4) at 110 DAP, T6 -Spray 1 + Spray 3 + Kinetin @100ppm (spray 5), T7 -Spray 2 + Spray 4 + Kinetin (100 ppm) + MnCl 2 (0.1%) (Spray 6) at 175 DAP. In Set-II ethrel treated (Pre-soaked setts) with T8-T14 treatments and Set-III KCl treated (Pre-soaked setts) with T15-T21) treatments, same types of treatments were given as in Set I. After 25 days of foliar application, total shoot population, fresh and dry weight of different plant parts, chlorophyll contents, and nitrate reductase (NR) activity were determined. Juice quality attributes were recorded in cane juice in each month starting from November 2017 to February 2018 and cane yield after harvesting. Findings obtained indicated higher SAI activity and reducing sugar content in treated buds. Further foliar application of ethrel and ethrel + nutrient and at elongation stage, foliar application of GA 3 and GA 3 + nutrient showed increased shoot population, chlorophyll a, b and total contents, fresh and dry weight of different plant parts and NR activity in treated sets. At harvesting, number of milliable cane (NMC/plot) in most of the treatments were higher; highest was in T11, T5 was at par followed by T13, T14 and then T8. Cane yield observed maximum in T5 (111.6 t/ha), T14 was at par (111.1 t/ha) followed by T8 (107.0 t/ha), T12 (106.4 t/ha), T11 (105.0 t/ha) and minimum in T1 (83.2 t/ha). Similarly, highest cane height and girth were observed in T11 (275.3 cm) and T8 (2.14 cm) treatments, respectively. Highest increase in sucrose % juice, CCS% and Brix were observed in T11 treatment, while lowest reducing sugars was obtained in T17 followed by T15 treatment. Results suggested beneficial impact of PGR and PGR+ nutrient combination application on growth, yield and juice quality attributes of sugarcane when applied sequentially in whole crop duration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated buds had higher SAI activity and reducing sugar content.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
treated budse1
Outcome
SAI activity and reducing sugar contente1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher SAI activity and reducing sugar content in treated buds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ethrel and nutrient sequences increased shoot population and chlorophyll contents.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
foliar application of ethrel and ethrel + nutriente1
Outcome
shoot population, chlorophyll a, b and total contentse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar application of ethrel and ethrel + nutrient and at elongation stage, foliar application of GA 3 and GA 3 + nutrient showed increased shoot population, chlorophyll a, b and total contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sequences increased plant-part fresh and dry weight and NR activity.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
treated setse1
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of different plant parts and NR activitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed increased shoot population, chlorophyll a, b and total contents, fresh and dry weight of different plant parts and NR activity in treated sets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1877 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvested millable cane number was highest in T11.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T11e1
Outcome
number of milliable cane (NMC/plot)e1
Direction
higheste1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of milliable cane (NMC/plot) in most of the treatments were higher; highest was in T11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1894–1987 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 had maximum cane yield of 111.6 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T5e1
Outcome
Cane yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
111.6 t/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cane yield observed maximum in T5 (111.6 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2083 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T14 yield was 111.1 t/ha and at par with T5.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T14e1
Outcome
at pare1
Value
111.1 t/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“T14 was at par (111.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2085–2112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 cane yield was 107.0 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T8e1
Outcome
T8e1
Value
107.0 t/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“T8 (107.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2125–2140 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T12 cane yield was 106.4 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T12e1
Outcome
T12e1
Value
106.4 t/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“T12 (106.4 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2142–2158 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 cane yield was 105.0 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T11e1
Outcome
T11e1
Value
105.0 t/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“T11 (105.0 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2160–2176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 gave minimum cane yield of 83.2 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T1e1
Outcome
minimume1
Direction
minimume1
Value
83.2 t/hae1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“minimum in T1 (83.2 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2181–2206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane height was highest in T11 at 275.3 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T11e1
Outcome
cane heighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
275.3 cme1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest cane height and girth were observed in T11 (275.3 cm) and T8 (2.14 cm) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane girth was highest in T8 at 2.14 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T8e1
Outcome
girthe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2.14 cme1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest cane height and girth were observed in T11 (275.3 cm) and T8 (2.14 cm) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2219–2308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 had the highest sucrose, CCS and Brix increases.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T11e1
Outcome
sucrose % juice, CCS% and Brixe1
Direction
Highest increasee1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest increase in sucrose % juice, CCS% and Brix were observed in T11 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2324–2405 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing sugars were lowest in T17, followed by T15.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Material
T17e1
Outcome
reducing sugarse1
Direction
loweste1

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributes of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest reducing sugars was obtained in T17 followed by T15 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2413–2481 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.