Paper · 2023 · Field Crops Research

Optimizing nitrogen application improves its efficiency by higher allocation in bolls of cotton under drip fertigation

Yu Tian; Liwen Tian; Fangyong Wang; et al.

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Context Nitrogen (N) loss is becoming one of the main limitations for sustainable agricultural production globally, particularly for crops such as cotton. Research question To alleviate this issue, a promising strategy may be to exploit the N-saving potential of cotton plants by optimizing N application ratios at different growth stages under lower N rate and higher planting density with wide-row spacing. Methods Two field experiments were carried out to investigate cotton yield, N use efficiency (NUE), N accumulation characteristics, and 15 N uptake and distribution in response to N fertilization. First, a two-year experiment was conducted with N fertilization of either 0, 120, 240, 360 (control) or 480 kg ha −1 . A three-year experiment was then carried out with 240 kg N ha −1 being applied with different ratios across three periods (squaring, flowering to peak boll , and late peak boll), i.e., 0:6:4 (N 064 ), 1:6:3 (N 163 ), 2:6:2 (N 262 , control), 3:6:1 (N 361 ) and 4:6:0 (N 460 ). Results Compared with conventional N fertilization (360 kg N ha −1 ), moderate fertilization at 240 kg N ha −1 resulted in steady and higher seed cotton yields of 5945 and 5603 kg ha −1 in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and improved NUE by 49.1–53.6%. Compared with conventional N 262 , a shift to later N application (N 064 ) increased both lint yield and partial factor fiber productivity of nitrogen (PFFPN) by 4.4–7.7%, and accumulated 6.1–14.4% more total N (K) in reproductive organs due to higher average (Vt) and maximum (Vm) accumulation rates by 25.2–49.0% and 15.0–48.7%, respectively, while the fast N accumulation period (∆t) shortened by 15.2–24.4%. N 064 partitioned 15.6% more 15 N to reproductive organs. NUE was significantly positively correlated with K, t 1 (the day when ∆t started), Vt, Vm, Tm (the day on which Vm occurred) and 15 N accumulation in middle and upper canopy bolls, and negatively correlated with ∆t of total N accumulation in reproductive organs. Conclusions Allocating N from the squaring period to the late peak boll period led to an increase in N uptake during the reproductive growth stage and greater allocation of N to cotton bolls under reduced-N cultivation and drip fertigation . Significance This N management strategy is a potential way to improve NUE and achieve sustainable and efficient production of cotton in arid areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate N at 240 kg N ha-1 gave a higher seed cotton yield of 5945 kg ha-1 in 2017 than conventional 360 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
moderate fertilization at 240 kg N ha −1e1
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Value
5945e1
Qualifier
kg ha −1 in 2017e1
Comparator
conventional N fertilization (360 kg N ha −1 )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with conventional N fertilization (360 kg N ha −1 ), moderate fertilization at 240 kg N ha −1 resulted in steady and higher seed cotton yields of 5945 and 5603 kg ha −1 in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and improved NUE by 49.1–53.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate N at 240 kg N ha-1 gave a higher seed cotton yield of 5603 kg ha-1 in 2018 than conventional 360 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
moderate fertilization at 240 kg N ha −1e1
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse1
Direction
highere1
Value
5603e1
Qualifier
kg ha −1 in 2017 and 2018e1
Comparator
conventional N fertilization (360 kg N ha −1 )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with conventional N fertilization (360 kg N ha −1 ), moderate fertilization at 240 kg N ha −1 resulted in steady and higher seed cotton yields of 5945 and 5603 kg ha −1 in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and improved NUE by 49.1–53.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate N at 240 kg N ha-1 improved NUE by 49.1–53.6% relative to conventional 360 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
moderate fertilization at 240 kg N ha −1e1
Outcome
NUEe1
Direction
improvede1
Value
49.1–53.6%e1
Comparator
conventional N fertilization (360 kg N ha −1 )e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with conventional N fertilization (360 kg N ha −1 ), moderate fertilization at 240 kg N ha −1 resulted in steady and higher seed cotton yields of 5945 and 5603 kg ha −1 in 2017 and 2018, respectively, and improved NUE by 49.1–53.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shifting N application later (N 064) increased lint yield and PFFPN by 4.4–7.7% relative to the conventional N 262 control.

Treatment
a shift to later N application (N 064 )e2
Outcome
lint yield and partial factor fiber productivity of nitrogen (PFFPN)e2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.4–7.7%e2
Comparator
conventional N 262e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with conventional N 262 , a shift to later N application (N 064 ) increased both lint yield and partial factor fiber productivity of nitrogen (PFFPN) by 4.4–7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shifting N application later (N 064) increased total N accumulation in reproductive organs by 6.1–14.4% relative to N 262.

Organ / stage
reproductive organse3
Treatment
a shift to later N application (N 064 )e2
Outcome
total N (K)e3
Direction
moree3
Value
6.1–14.4%e3
Comparator
conventional N 262e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with conventional N 262 , a shift to later N application (N 064 ) increased both lint yield and partial factor fiber productivity of nitrogen (PFFPN) by 4.4–7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1422 · show in text ↑
e3

“accumulated 6.1–14.4% more total N (K) in reproductive organs due to higher average (Vt) and maximum (Vm) accumulation rates by 25.2–49.0% and 15.0–48.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shifting N application later (N 064) increased the average (Vt) accumulation rate by 25.2–49.0% relative to N 262.

Treatment
a shift to later N application (N 064 )e2
Outcome
average (Vt)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
25.2–49.0%e3
Qualifier
accumulation ratese3
Comparator
conventional N 262e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with conventional N 262 , a shift to later N application (N 064 ) increased both lint yield and partial factor fiber productivity of nitrogen (PFFPN) by 4.4–7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1422 · show in text ↑
e3

“accumulated 6.1–14.4% more total N (K) in reproductive organs due to higher average (Vt) and maximum (Vm) accumulation rates by 25.2–49.0% and 15.0–48.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shifting N application later (N 064) increased the maximum (Vm) accumulation rate by 15.0–48.7% relative to N 262.

Treatment
a shift to later N application (N 064 )e2
Outcome
maximum (Vm)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
15.0–48.7%e3
Qualifier
accumulation ratese3
Comparator
conventional N 262e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with conventional N 262 , a shift to later N application (N 064 ) increased both lint yield and partial factor fiber productivity of nitrogen (PFFPN) by 4.4–7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1422 · show in text ↑
e3

“accumulated 6.1–14.4% more total N (K) in reproductive organs due to higher average (Vt) and maximum (Vm) accumulation rates by 25.2–49.0% and 15.0–48.7%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shifting N application later (N 064) shortened the fast N accumulation period (∆t) by 15.2–24.4% relative to N 262.

Treatment
a shift to later N application (N 064 )e2
Outcome
fast N accumulation period (∆t)e4
Direction
shortenede4
Value
15.2–24.4%e4
Comparator
conventional N 262e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with conventional N 262 , a shift to later N application (N 064 ) increased both lint yield and partial factor fiber productivity of nitrogen (PFFPN) by 4.4–7.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1422 · show in text ↑
e4

“while the fast N accumulation period (∆t) shortened by 15.2–24.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N 064 partitioned 15.6% more 15N to reproductive organs.

Treatment
N 064e5
Outcome
15 N to reproductive organse5
Direction
moree5
Value
15.6%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e5

“N 064 partitioned 15.6% more 15 N to reproductive organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1720 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE was significantly positively correlated with K, t1 and Vt.

Compound
Ne6
Outcome
NUEe6
Direction
positively correlatede6
Qualifier
K, t 1 (the day when ∆t started), Vte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“NUE was significantly positively correlated with K, t 1 (the day when ∆t started), Vt, Vm, Tm (the day on which Vm occurred) and 15 N accumulation in middle and upper canopy bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1901 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE was significantly positively correlated with Vm, Tm and 15N accumulation in middle and upper canopy bolls.

Organ / stage
middle and upper canopy bollse6
Compound
15 Ne6
Outcome
NUEe6
Direction
positively correlatede6
Qualifier
Vm, Tme6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“NUE was significantly positively correlated with K, t 1 (the day when ∆t started), Vt, Vm, Tm (the day on which Vm occurred) and 15 N accumulation in middle and upper canopy bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1901 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NUE was negatively correlated with ∆t of total N accumulation in reproductive organs.

Organ / stage
reproductive organse7
Outcome
NUEe6
Direction
negatively correlatede7
Qualifier
∆t of total N accumulation in reproductive organse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e6

“NUE was significantly positively correlated with K, t 1 (the day when ∆t started), Vt, Vm, Tm (the day on which Vm occurred) and 15 N accumulation in middle and upper canopy bolls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1722–1901 · show in text ↑
e7

“negatively correlated with ∆t of total N accumulation in reproductive organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–1983 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend this N management strategy to improve NUE for cotton in arid areas.

Outcome
improve NUEe7
Setting
arid arease7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bolls of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–95 · show in text ↑
e7

“This N management strategy is a potential way to improve NUE and achieve sustainable and efficient production of cotton in arid areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2374 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

103 papers: 65 positive, 38 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.