Abstract
A field trial was set up at U. P. Council of Sugarcane Research Farm, Shahjahanpur, U.P. (INDIA) during 2007-2010 to assess the impact of decomposed pressmud (organic matter) on soil productivity for Sugarcane yield and quality. Four replicates of 5 treatments: control (no amendment), 2/3 RDN through inorganic source, 100% RDN through inorganic source, 1/3 RDN through biocompost + 2/3 RDN through inorganic source and 1/3 RDN through biocompost. The data showed that sugarcane yield and other quality parameters were influenced by the different treatments. Its impact on soil productivity was found that 1/3 of recommended dose of nitrogen given by the biocompost plus 2/3 by inorganic source gave more than 10 percent higher sugarcane yield over 100 percent recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic source. Slight improvement in juice quality was also observed in biocompost application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Biocompost supplying one third of nitrogen with inorganic nitrogen supplying two thirds produced over 10 percent higher sugarcane yield than the full inorganic nitrogen dose.
Verbatim
e0“1/3 of recommended dose of nitrogen given by the biocompost plus 2/3 by inorganic source gave more than 10 percent higher sugarcane yield over 100 percent recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic source.”
t0“Sugarcane”
Claim · model-written summary
Biocompost application slightly improved sugarcane juice quality.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Slight improvement in juice quality was also observed in biocompost application.”
t0“Sugarcane”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.