Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Grain yield and quality performances of different late-season rice cultivars in response to experimental warming in subtropical China

Taotao Yang; Xueming Tan; Shan Huang; et al.

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Climate warming has pronounced effects on rice production in China. However, late-seasons rice cultivars are diverse in double rice cropping systems, and the actual responses in grain yield and quality of different late-season rice cultivars to climate warming are still unclear. Methods A two-year field warming experiment was conducted by using free-air temperature increase facilities with three widely-planted late-season rice cultivars, including Taiyou398 (TY, short growth duration indica hybrid rice), Jiuxiangnian (JXN, long growth duration indica inbred rice), and Yongyou1538 (YY, long growth duration indica-japonica hybrid rice) in a double rice cropping system in subtropical China. Results Warming (1.9–2.0°C) had no significant effects on the grain yields of TY and JXN, but significantly decreased that of YY by 4.8% relative to ambient treatment due to a reduction of spikelet number. Compared to ambient treatment, the head rice yields of TY and YY did not change while that of JXN increased by 6.3% under warming conditions. Warming significantly increased the head rice rates of JXN and YY by 6.6% and 7.8%, and the chalky grain rates of TY, JXN, and YY by 79.1%, 21.6%, and 7.6%, respectively. Under warming conditions, the amylose content of JXN and YY decreased significantly by 7.5% and 8.8%, and the setback of three cultivars decreased significantly by an average of 41.5%. Conclusion Warming could improve the milling and eating qualities of long growth duration late-season rice (JXN and YY) and increase or maintain their head rice yield, even though decreased the grain yield of indica-japonica hybrid rice (YY). These results will provide a better understanding for the selection of suitable late-season rice cultivars under future climate warming conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming had no significant effect on grain yield of TY rice relative to ambient treatment.

Material
TYe1
Treatment
Warminge1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
ambient treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warming (1.9–2.0°C) had no significant effects on the grain yields of TY and JXN, but significantly decreased that of YY by 4.8% relative to ambient treatment due to a reduction of spikelet number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming had no significant effect on grain yield of JXN rice relative to ambient treatment.

Material
JXNe1
Treatment
Warminge1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
ambient treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warming (1.9–2.0°C) had no significant effects on the grain yields of TY and JXN, but significantly decreased that of YY by 4.8% relative to ambient treatment due to a reduction of spikelet number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly decreased grain yield of YY rice by 4.8% relative to ambient treatment, due to a reduction of spikelet number.

Material
YYe1
Treatment
Warminge1
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
4.8%e1
Qualifier
due to a reduction of spikelet numbere1
Comparator
ambient treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“Warming (1.9–2.0°C) had no significant effects on the grain yields of TY and JXN, but significantly decreased that of YY by 4.8% relative to ambient treatment due to a reduction of spikelet number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–914 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under warming conditions, head rice yield of TY did not change relative to ambient treatment.

Material
TYe2
Treatment
warming conditionse2
Outcome
head rice yieldse2
Direction
did not changee2
Comparator
ambient treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to ambient treatment, the head rice yields of TY and YY did not change while that of JXN increased by 6.3% under warming conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under warming conditions, head rice yield of YY did not change relative to ambient treatment.

Material
YYe2
Treatment
warming conditionse2
Outcome
head rice yieldse2
Direction
did not changee2
Comparator
ambient treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to ambient treatment, the head rice yields of TY and YY did not change while that of JXN increased by 6.3% under warming conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under warming conditions, head rice yield of JXN increased by 6.3% relative to ambient treatment.

Material
JXNe2
Treatment
warming conditionse2
Outcome
head rice yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
6.3%e2
Comparator
ambient treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared to ambient treatment, the head rice yields of TY and YY did not change while that of JXN increased by 6.3% under warming conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased head rice rate of JXN rice by 6.6%.

Material
JXNe3
Treatment
Warminge3
Outcome
head rice ratese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
6.6%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“Warming significantly increased the head rice rates of JXN and YY by 6.6% and 7.8%, and the chalky grain rates of TY, JXN, and YY by 79.1%, 21.6%, and 7.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased head rice rate of YY rice by 7.8%.

Material
YYe3
Treatment
Warminge3
Outcome
head rice ratese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
7.8%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“Warming significantly increased the head rice rates of JXN and YY by 6.6% and 7.8%, and the chalky grain rates of TY, JXN, and YY by 79.1%, 21.6%, and 7.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased chalky grain rate of TY rice by 79.1%.

Material
TYe3
Treatment
Warminge3
Outcome
chalky grain ratese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
79.1%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“Warming significantly increased the head rice rates of JXN and YY by 6.6% and 7.8%, and the chalky grain rates of TY, JXN, and YY by 79.1%, 21.6%, and 7.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased chalky grain rate of JXN rice by 21.6%.

Material
JXNe3
Treatment
Warminge3
Outcome
chalky grain ratese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
21.6%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“Warming significantly increased the head rice rates of JXN and YY by 6.6% and 7.8%, and the chalky grain rates of TY, JXN, and YY by 79.1%, 21.6%, and 7.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Warming significantly increased chalky grain rate of YY rice by 7.6%.

Material
YYe3
Treatment
Warminge3
Outcome
chalky grain ratese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
7.6%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“Warming significantly increased the head rice rates of JXN and YY by 6.6% and 7.8%, and the chalky grain rates of TY, JXN, and YY by 79.1%, 21.6%, and 7.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under warming conditions, amylose content of JXN rice decreased significantly by 7.5%.

Material
JXNe4
Treatment
Under warming conditionse4
Outcome
amylose contente4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
7.5%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under warming conditions, the amylose content of JXN and YY decreased significantly by 7.5% and 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under warming conditions, amylose content of YY rice decreased significantly by 8.8%.

Material
YYe4
Treatment
Under warming conditionse4
Outcome
amylose contente4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
8.8%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under warming conditions, the amylose content of JXN and YY decreased significantly by 7.5% and 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under warming conditions, setback of three rice cultivars decreased significantly by an average of 41.5%.

Material
three cultivarse5
Treatment
warming conditionse4
Outcome
setbacke5
Direction
decreasede5
Value
41.5%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“late-season rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under warming conditions, the amylose content of JXN and YY decreased significantly by 7.5% and 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1329 · show in text ↑
e5

“and the setback of three cultivars decreased significantly by an average of 41.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1412 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

40 papers: 5 positive, 35 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

heat · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 8 positive, 21 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

heat · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 36 positive, 159 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.