Paper · 2004 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Effects of Crop Sanitation and Ridomil MZ Applications on Late Blight Severity and Tomato Yields in Cameroon

Younyi, PC.; Fontem, DA.; Suh, MN.

7
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) production in Cameroon is usually handicapped by late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans. A field trial was conducted during 1997 in Dschang, Cameroon, to assess the effect of Ridomil MZ (8% metalaxyl + 64% mancozeb) sprays, and sanitation (a weekly picking of diseased leaves) on late blight development and yield of five tomato varieties. Plots received Ridomil MZ (2.5 kg/ha) and sanitation singly or combined. Control plots were neither sprayed nor cleaned from diseased leaves. All treatments were applied ten times in a weekly schedule. Late blight intensity was assessed every 7 days and marketable fruit yields were obtained at maturity. Differences in late blight intensity between sanitation and control plots were not significant (P= 0,05). Fungicide treatments were more effective than sanitation in reducing late blight severity. Percent fruit infection was 100% in control or sanitation plots of ARP I366-1, ARP D1, ARP D2, Roma, and no marketable fruits were harvested on these treatments. Late blight was less severe on Mecline compared to the other varieties. Consequently, Mecline out-yielded Roma, ARP I366-1, ARP D1 and ARP D2 varieties. Results suggest that the fungicide-alternative method of late blight control, using sanitation is not as effective in tomato late blight management as appropriate fungicide sprays.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late blight intensity did not differ significantly between sanitation and control plots

Treatment
sanitation (a weekly picking of diseased leaves)e2
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
late blight intensitye1
Comparator
control plotse1
Setting
Dschang, Cameroone3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) production in Cameroon is usually handicapped by late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Differences in late blight intensity between sanitation and control plots were not significant (P= 0,05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–788 · show in text ↑
e2

“sanitation (a weekly picking of diseased leaves)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–315 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trial was conducted during 1997 in Dschang, Cameroon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 128–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatments were more effective than sanitation in reducing late blight severity

Treatment
Fungicide treatmentse1
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
late blight severitye1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
sanitatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) production in Cameroon is usually handicapped by late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fungicide treatments were more effective than sanitation in reducing late blight severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–879 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit infection was 100% on control or sanitation plots of ARP I366-1, ARP D1, ARP D2 and Roma

Material
ARP I366-1, ARP D1, ARP D2, Romae1
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
Percent fruit infectione1
Value
100%e1
Qualifier
control or sanitation plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) production in Cameroon is usually handicapped by late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Percent fruit infection was 100% in control or sanitation plots of ARP I366-1, ARP D1, ARP D2, Roma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–980 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No marketable fruits were harvested on the control or sanitation treatments of the four varieties with 100% fruit infection

Outcome
marketable fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“no marketable fruits were harvested on these treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1041 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late blight was less severe on Mecline than on the other varieties

Material
Meclinee1
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
Late blighte1
Direction
less severee1
Comparator
the other varietiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) production in Cameroon is usually handicapped by late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Late blight was less severe on Mecline compared to the other varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mecline out-yielded Roma, ARP I366-1, ARP D1 and ARP D2 in marketable fruit yield

Material
Meclinee1
Outcome
marketable fruit yieldse2
Direction
out-yieldede1
Comparator
Roma, ARP I366-1, ARP D1 and ARP D2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e1

“Consequently, Mecline out-yielded Roma, ARP I366-1, ARP D1 and ARP D2 varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1194 · show in text ↑
e2

“marketable fruit yields were obtained at maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sanitation is not as effective as appropriate fungicide sprays in managing tomato late blight

Treatment
sanitatione1
Interactor
Phytophthora infestansPhytophthora infestanse0pathogen
Outcome
tomato late blight managemente1
Direction
not as effectivee1
Comparator
appropriate fungicide sprayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora infestans
Phytophthora infestans · InteractorHoward F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, United States · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato Yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–96 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) production in Cameroon is usually handicapped by late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–126 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results suggest that the fungicide-alternative method of late blight control, using sanitation is not as effective in tomato late blight management as appropriate fungicide sprays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1375 · show in text ↑

sanitation · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fungicide · Phytophthora infestans · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.