Abstract
The yield response of several sweet potato varieties to salinity stress has been extensively studied in the scientific literature, but no research on the Koganesengan and Beniazuma varieties has been identified. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of various irrigation salinity levels on the growth (vine and tuber lengths, stem and tuber diameters, and number of leaves, shoots, and tubers), yield (fresh, dry, tuber, and total yields, and water use efficiencies for vine, tuber, and total yields), and quality parameters (dry matter, ash, crude fiber, starch, phenolic matter, antioxidant activity, ß-carotene, ascorbic acid, protein, saccharose, glucose, and fructose contents) of these sweet potato varieties under drip irrigation. The findings show that without a varietal difference, increasing water salinity levels increased soil salinity and decreased soil pH values. Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”. Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”. Significant variations between varieties were only seen under the control treatment for all yield parameters (except dry vine yield) and water use efficiency values. According to the calculated salinity threshold and slope values, “Beniazuma” is more sensitive to salt stress than “Koganesengan”.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation salinity increased soil salinity for both varieties.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- increasing water salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- soil salinitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“without a varietal difference, increasing water salinity levels increased soil salinity and decreased soil pH values.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation salinity decreased soil pH for both varieties.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- increasing water salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- soil pH valuese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“without a varietal difference, increasing water salinity levels increased soil salinity and decreased soil pH values.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity adversely affected some Beniazuma growth parameters.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beniazumae0
- Treatment
- salinity levele0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- negatively affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity adversely affected some Beniazuma yield parameters.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beniazumae0
- Treatment
- salinity levele0
- Outcome
- yield parameterse0
- Direction
- negatively affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Koganesengan growth and yield parameters were not negatively affected by salinity.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Koganesengane0
- Treatment
- salinity levele0
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameterse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity affected Koganesengan crude fiber content.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Koganesengane0
- Treatment
- Irrigation salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- crude fiber contente0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity affected Koganesengan antioxidant activity.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Koganesengane0
- Treatment
- Irrigation salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- antioxidant activitye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity affected Beniazuma ash content.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beniazumae0
- Treatment
- Irrigation salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- ashe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity affected Beniazuma starch content.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beniazumae0
- Treatment
- Irrigation salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- starche0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity affected Beniazuma ß-carotene content.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beniazumae0
- Treatment
- Irrigation salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- ß-carotenee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Salinity affected Beniazuma ascorbic acid content.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beniazumae0
- Treatment
- Irrigation salinity levelse0
- Outcome
- ascorbic acid contentse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties differed significantly under control conditions in all yield parameters except dry vine yield.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- control treatmente0
- Outcome
- all yield parameterse0
- Qualifier
- except dry vine yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Significant variations between varieties were only seen under the control treatment for all yield parameters (except dry vine yield) and water use efficiency values.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Varieties differed significantly under control conditions in water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Treatment
- control treatmente0
- Outcome
- water use efficiency valuese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Significant variations between varieties were only seen under the control treatment for all yield parameters (except dry vine yield) and water use efficiency values.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
Claim · model-written summary
Beniazuma was more salt-sensitive than Koganesengan by calculated thresholds and slopes.
- Taxon
- sweet potato
Ipomoea batatast0 - Material
- Beniazumae0
- Outcome
- sensitive to salt stresse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Qualifier
- calculated salinity threshold and slope valuese0
- Comparator
- Koganesengane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Flower.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“According to the calculated salinity threshold and slope values, “Beniazuma” is more sensitive to salt stress than “Koganesengan”.”
t0“Sweet Potato”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →salinity · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.