Paper · 2023 · ACS Agricultural Science & Technology

Salinity Stress Effects on the Growth Yield and Quality Performance of Two Sweet Potato Varieties

Kivanc Hayri Doganay; Ahmet Kurunc; Cuneyt Dincer

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The yield response of several sweet potato varieties to salinity stress has been extensively studied in the scientific literature, but no research on the Koganesengan and Beniazuma varieties has been identified. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of various irrigation salinity levels on the growth (vine and tuber lengths, stem and tuber diameters, and number of leaves, shoots, and tubers), yield (fresh, dry, tuber, and total yields, and water use efficiencies for vine, tuber, and total yields), and quality parameters (dry matter, ash, crude fiber, starch, phenolic matter, antioxidant activity, ß-carotene, ascorbic acid, protein, saccharose, glucose, and fructose contents) of these sweet potato varieties under drip irrigation. The findings show that without a varietal difference, increasing water salinity levels increased soil salinity and decreased soil pH values. Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”. Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”. Significant variations between varieties were only seen under the control treatment for all yield parameters (except dry vine yield) and water use efficiency values. According to the calculated salinity threshold and slope values, “Beniazuma” is more sensitive to salt stress than “Koganesengan”.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity increased soil salinity for both varieties.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
increasing water salinity levelse0
Outcome
soil salinitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without a varietal difference, increasing water salinity levels increased soil salinity and decreased soil pH values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity decreased soil pH for both varieties.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
increasing water salinity levelse0
Outcome
soil pH valuese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without a varietal difference, increasing water salinity levels increased soil salinity and decreased soil pH values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity adversely affected some Beniazuma growth parameters.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Beniazumae0
Treatment
salinity levele0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity adversely affected some Beniazuma yield parameters.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Beniazumae0
Treatment
salinity levele0
Outcome
yield parameterse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Koganesengan growth and yield parameters were not negatively affected by salinity.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Koganesengane0
Treatment
salinity levele0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some growth and yield parameters of “Beniazuma” were negatively affected by the salinity level, but not those of “Koganesengan”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity affected Koganesengan crude fiber content.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Koganesengane0
Treatment
Irrigation salinity levelse0
Outcome
crude fiber contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity affected Koganesengan antioxidant activity.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Koganesengane0
Treatment
Irrigation salinity levelse0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity affected Beniazuma ash content.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Beniazumae0
Treatment
Irrigation salinity levelse0
Outcome
ashe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity affected Beniazuma starch content.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Beniazumae0
Treatment
Irrigation salinity levelse0
Outcome
starche0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity affected Beniazuma ß-carotene content.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Beniazumae0
Treatment
Irrigation salinity levelse0
Outcome
ß-carotenee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity affected Beniazuma ascorbic acid content.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Beniazumae0
Treatment
Irrigation salinity levelse0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation salinity levels only had an effect on the crude fiber content and antioxidant activity of “Koganesengan” and the ash, starch, ß-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents of “Beniazuma”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed significantly under control conditions in all yield parameters except dry vine yield.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
all yield parameterse0
Qualifier
except dry vine yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variations between varieties were only seen under the control treatment for all yield parameters (except dry vine yield) and water use efficiency values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties differed significantly under control conditions in water use efficiency.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
water use efficiency valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant variations between varieties were only seen under the control treatment for all yield parameters (except dry vine yield) and water use efficiency values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beniazuma was more salt-sensitive than Koganesengan by calculated thresholds and slopes.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Material
Beniazumae0
Outcome
sensitive to salt stresse0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
calculated salinity threshold and slope valuese0
Comparator
Koganesengane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“According to the calculated salinity threshold and slope values, “Beniazuma” is more sensitive to salt stress than “Koganesengan”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1382–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–87 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.