Abstract
The field experiment was carried out on “Effect of folior application of macronutrients (N, P and K) on growth and yield of green gram.” during kharif season of the year 2017-18 at the Research farm of College of Agriculture, Latur. The experiment was laid in randomized block design with three replications and variety BM 2003-2 as a test crop along with eight treatments viz., T1 - Control, T2 - RDF + Water Spray, T3 - RDF + 19:19:19 @ 0.5 % at vegetative stage, T4 - RDF + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at flowering stage, T5 - RDF + 13:00:45 @ 1.0 % at grain filling stage, T6 - T3 + T4, T7 - T4 + T5 and T8- T3 + T4 + T5. The results of field study indicated that, the growth, yield uptake and quality of green gram were significantly influenced by foliar application of macronutrients (N, P and K). The growth parameters viz., plant height, number of branches, number of leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, number of pod plant-1 and dry matter of green gram were significantly improved due to treatment T8 (RDF + 19:19:19 @ 0.5 % at vegetative stage, RDF + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at flowering stage and RDF + 13:00:45 @ 1.0 % at grain filling stage). Whereas, yield contributing characters viz., seed yield, straw yield and biological yield as well as quality parameters such as protein content, protein yield and test weight of seed in green gram were also increased
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar macronutrients significantly influenced green gram nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- green gram
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Treatment
- foliar application of macronutrients (N, P and K)e0
- Outcome
- yield uptakee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the growth, yield uptake and quality of green gram were significantly influenced by foliar application of macronutrients (N, P and K).”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T8 significantly improved green gram height, branch number and leaf number.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- treatment T8e0
- Outcome
- plant height, number of branches, number of leaves plant-1e0
- Direction
- significantly improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, number of branches, number of leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, number of pod plant-1 and dry matter of green gram were significantly improved due to treatment T8 (RDF + 19:19:19 @ 0.5 % at vegetative stage, RDF + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at flowering stage and RDF + 13:00:45 @ 1.0 % at grain filling stage).”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T8 significantly improved green gram leaf area, pod number and dry matter.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- treatment T8e0
- Outcome
- leaf area plant-1, number of pod plant-1 and dry mattere0
- Direction
- significantly improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant height, number of branches, number of leaves plant-1, leaf area plant-1, number of pod plant-1 and dry matter of green gram were significantly improved due to treatment T8 (RDF + 19:19:19 @ 0.5 % at vegetative stage, RDF + 00:52:34 @ 1.0 % at flowering stage and RDF + 13:00:45 @ 1.0 % at grain filling stage).”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar macronutrient application increased green gram seed, straw and biological yields.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- folior application of macronutrients (N, P and K)t0
- Outcome
- seed yield, straw yield and biological yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield, straw yield and biological yield as well as quality parameters such as protein content, protein yield and test weight of seed in green gram were also increased”
t0“folior application of macronutrients (N, P and K)”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar macronutrient application increased green gram protein content, protein yield and seed test weight.
- Taxon
- green gramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- folior application of macronutrients (N, P and K)t0
- Outcome
- protein content, protein yield and test weight of seede0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quality parameters such as protein content, protein yield and test weight of seed in green gram were also increased”
t0“folior application of macronutrients (N, P and K)”
The same questions in other papers
macronutrient · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
macronutrient · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →phosphorus · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
174 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
175 papers more in this group
See all 179 papers →nitrogen · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →potassium · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →phosphorus · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
21 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.