Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Advanced Chemistry Research

Effect of herbicidal weed management on growth, yield attributes and productivity of Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh

Amar Nath; Rama Mohan Savu; Nitish Tiwari

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present research entitled “Effect of herbicidal weed management on growth, yield attributes and productivity of Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh" was conducted during Rabi season of 2020-21 at the Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Raipur (CG). The soil of experimental site was sandy loam, poor in available nitrogen, medium in available phosphorus and rich in potassium contents with neutral pH. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The treatments consisted of fifteen weed management practices viz, T1: Oxadiargyl @ 80 g/ha 0-3 DAS, T2: Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha 0-3 DAS, T3: Topramezone @ 19.35 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed, T4: Topramezone @ 25.8 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed, T5: Topramezone @ 32.25 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed, T6: Topramezone (directed application) @ 25.8 g/ha 5-6 Leaf stage of weed, T7: Fluzifop-p-butyl 13.4 % + Fomesafen 11.1 % (directed application) @ 250 g/ha 5-6 Leaf stage of weed, T8: Metribuzin @ 350g/ha fb Topramezone @ 25.8 g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 2-3 Leaf stage of weed, T9: Metribuzin @ 350g/ha fb Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 5-6 Leaf stage of weed, T10: Fluzifop-p-butyl 13.4 % + Fomesafen 11.1 % @ 250 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed, T11: Sodium acifluorfen 16.5 %+ clodinafop proparzyl 18 % (directed application) @ 187.5g/ha 2-3 leaf stage of weed T12: Mertibuzin (directed application) @ 350 g/ha 2-3 leaf stage of weed, T13: Metsulfuron (directed application) @ 4 g/ha 2-3 leaf stage of weed, T14: Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS and T15: Unweeded control. The Lathyrus variety Prateek was sown on November 15, 2020 and harvested on March 8, 2021. The experimental finding showed that the growth characteristics viz. plant population, plant height, number of branches/plant, dry weight accumulation (g/plant), number of nodules/plant, dry weight nodules/plant and crop growth rate and yield attributes viz., number of seeds/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed yield, Stover yield, 100 seed weight and harvest index were found significantly superior in Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14), over other weed management practices but was at par with treatment T9: Metribuzin @ 350g/ha fb Metribuzin @ 350g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 5-6 Leaf stage of weed. The lower values of above characters have been observed in the unwedded control (T15) followed by Fluzifop-p-butyl 13.4 % + Fomesafen 11.1 % @ 250 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed (T10). Predominant weed species Medicago denticulate L., Cichorium intybus L., Chenopodium album L., Melilotus indica L, Alternanthera sessilis L, Echinochloa colona L. and Physallis minima L, intensified in the experimental field. Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14) followed by Topramezone @ 32.25 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed (T5) observed in effectively reducing weed density, weed dry matter accumulation, lowest weed growth rate and thus providing maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index. While, the weed index was higher at Unwedded control (T15). In term of economic returns, the gross returns and net return was maximum under Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14) followed Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha fb Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 5-6 Leaf stage of weed (T9), whereas, net return and B: C ratio was maximum under Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha fb Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 5-6 Leaf stage of weed (T9). This might be because of higher cost of cultivation due to continuous frequent weeding in Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS plot (T14).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave significantly superior growth characteristics of Lathyrus compared with other weed management practices.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DASe2
Outcome
growth characteristicse1
Direction
significantly superiore2
Qualifier
at par with treatment T9e2
Comparator
other weed management practicese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“the growth characteristics viz. plant population, plant height, number of branches/plant, dry weight accumulation (g/plant), number of nodules/plant, dry weight nodules/plant and crop growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1888 · show in text ↑
e2

“were found significantly superior in Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14), over other weed management practices but was at par with treatment T9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave significantly superior yield attributes and seed yield of Lathyrus compared with other weed management practices.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DASe2
Outcome
yield attributese1
Direction
significantly superiore2
Qualifier
at par with treatment T9e2
Comparator
other weed management practicese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield attributes viz., number of seeds/plant, number of seeds/pod, seed yield, Stover yield, 100 seed weight and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–2019 · show in text ↑
e2

“were found significantly superior in Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14), over other weed management practices but was at par with treatment T9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2020–2164 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice reduced weed density.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DASe2
Outcome
weed densitye2
Direction
reducinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14) followed by Topramezone @ 32.25 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed (T5) observed in effectively reducing weed density, weed dry matter accumulation, lowest weed growth rate and thus providing maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2655–2931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice reduced weed dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DASe2
Outcome
weed dry matter accumulatione2
Direction
reducinge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14) followed by Topramezone @ 32.25 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed (T5) observed in effectively reducing weed density, weed dry matter accumulation, lowest weed growth rate and thus providing maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2655–2931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave the lowest weed growth rate.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DASe2
Outcome
weed growth ratee2
Direction
loweste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14) followed by Topramezone @ 32.25 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed (T5) observed in effectively reducing weed density, weed dry matter accumulation, lowest weed growth rate and thus providing maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2655–2931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave the maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DASe2
Outcome
weed control efficiency and weed control indexe2
Direction
maximume2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14) followed by Topramezone @ 32.25 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed (T5) observed in effectively reducing weed density, weed dry matter accumulation, lowest weed growth rate and thus providing maximum weed control efficiency and weed control index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2655–2931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The unweeded control gave lower values of the growth and yield characters of Lathyrus.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
unwedded control (T15)e3
Outcome
values of above characterse3
Direction
lowere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lower values of above characters have been observed in the unwedded control (T15) followed by Fluzifop-p-butyl 13.4 % + Fomesafen 11.1 % @ 250 g/ha 2-3 Leaf stage of weed (T10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2248–2428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed index was higher in the unweeded control.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Unwedded control (T15)e4
Outcome
weed indexe4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e4

“the weed index was higher at Unwedded control (T15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2940–2991 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave the maximum gross returns and net return.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DASe5
Outcome
gross returns and net returne5
Direction
maximume5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e5

“the gross returns and net return was maximum under Hand weeding twice 20 & 40 DAS (T14) followed Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha fb Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 5-6 Leaf stage of weed (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3022–3206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin applied twice gave the maximum net return and B:C ratio.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Treatment
Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha fb Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 5-6 Leaf stage of weede6
Outcome
net return and B: C ratioe6
Direction
maximume6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas, net return and B: C ratio was maximum under Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha fb Metribuzin @ 350 g/ha at 0-3 DAS & 5-6 Leaf stage of weed (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3208–3348 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Predominant weed species, including Medicago denticulate and Cichorium intybus, intensified in the Lathyrus field.

Taxon
LathyrusLathyrust0
Interactor
Medicago denticulate L.e7weed
Second interactor
Cichorium intybus L.Cichorium intybuse7weed
Outcome
predominant weed speciese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus
Lathyrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sannse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · Second interactorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lathyrus (Lathyrus sativus L.) for Chhattisgarh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–132 · show in text ↑
e7

“Predominant weed species Medicago denticulate L., Cichorium intybus L., Chenopodium album L., Melilotus indica L, Alternanthera sessilis L, Echinochloa colona L. and Physallis minima L, intensified in the experimental field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2430–2653 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · LathyrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · LathyrusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · growth · LathyrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · weed · LathyrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.