Abstract
Beneficial microorganisms play a pivotal role in the invasion process of exotic plants, including arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Bacillus . However, limited research exists on the synergistic influence of AMF and Bacillus on the competition between both invasive and native plants. In this study, pot cultures of Ageratina adenophora monoculture, Rabdosia amethystoides monoculture, and A. adenophora and R. amethystoides mixture were used to investigate the effects of dominant AMF ( Septoglomus constrictum , SC) and Bacillus cereus (BC), and the co-inoculation of BC and SC on the competitive growth of A. adenophora . The results showed that inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides . Additionally, inoculation with BC increased the biomass of R. amethystoides by 185.07%, while inoculation with SC or BC + SC decreased R. amethystoides biomass by 37.31 and 59.70% compared to the uninoculated treatment. Inoculation with BC significantly increased the nutrient contents in the rhizosphere soil of both plants and promoted their growth. Inoculation with SC or SC + BC notably increased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of A. adenophora , therefore enhancing its competitiveness. Compared with single inoculation, dual inoculation with SC and BC increased AMF colonization rate and Bacillus density, indicating that SC and BC can form a synergistic effect to further enhance the growth and competitiveness of A. adenophora . This study reveals the distinct role of S. constrictum and B. cereus during the invasion of A. adenophora , and provide new clues to the underlying mechanisms of interaction between invasive plant, AMF and Bacillus .
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus cereus inoculation increased Ageratina biomass by 14.77% during competition with Rabdosia.
- Taxon
- A. adenophora
Ageratina adenophorae0 - Treatment
- inoculation with BCe0
- Interactor
- Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereuse1symbiont - Outcome
- biomass of A. adenophorae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 14.77e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_2.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e0“inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides .”
e1“Bacillus cereus (BC)”
Claim · model-written summary
Septoglomus constrictum inoculation increased Ageratina biomass by 112.07% during competition.
- Taxon
- A. adenophora
Ageratina adenophorae0 - Treatment
- SCe0
- Interactor
- Septoglomus constrictumSeptoglomus constrictume1symbiont
- Outcome
- biomass of A. adenophorae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 112.07e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides .”
e1“Septoglomus constrictum , SC”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined BC and SC inoculation increased Ageratina biomass by 197.74% during competition.
- Taxon
- A. adenophora
Ageratina adenophorae0 - Treatment
- BC + SCe0
- Outcome
- biomass of A. adenophorae0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 197.74%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides .”
Claim · model-written summary
BC inoculation increased Rabdosia biomass by 185.07%.
- Taxon
- R. amethystoides
Isodon amethystoidese0 - Treatment
- inoculation with BCe0
- Interactor
- Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereuse1symbiont - Outcome
- biomass of R. amethystoidese0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 185.07%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)

Verbatim
e0“inoculation with BC increased the biomass of R. amethystoides by 185.07%”
e1“Bacillus cereus (BC)”
Claim · model-written summary
SC inoculation decreased Rabdosia biomass by 37.31% versus uninoculated treatment.
- Taxon
- R. amethystoides
Isodon amethystoidese0 - Treatment
- inoculation with SCe0
- Interactor
- Septoglomus constrictumSeptoglomus constrictume1symbiont
- Outcome
- R. amethystoides biomasse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 37.31e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with SC or BC + SC decreased R. amethystoides biomass by 37.31 and 59.70% compared to the uninoculated treatment.”
e1“Septoglomus constrictum , SC”
Claim · model-written summary
BC and SC coinoculation decreased Rabdosia biomass by 59.70% versus uninoculated treatment.
- Taxon
- R. amethystoides
Isodon amethystoidese0 - Treatment
- BC + SCe0
- Outcome
- R. amethystoides biomasse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 59.70%e0
- Comparator
- uninoculated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with SC or BC + SC decreased R. amethystoides biomass by 37.31 and 59.70% compared to the uninoculated treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
BC inoculation increased rhizosphere soil nutrient content for both plants and promoted their growth.
- Taxon
- Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophorae1 - Treatment
- Inoculation with BCe0
- Outcome
- nutrient contents in the rhizosphere soil of both plants and promoted their growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with BC significantly increased the nutrient contents in the rhizosphere soil of both plants and promoted their growth.”
e1“Ageratina adenophora monoculture, Rabdosia amethystoides monoculture”
Claim · model-written summary
SC inoculation increased nitrogen and phosphorus content of Ageratina, enhancing competitiveness.
- Taxon
- A. adenophora
Ageratina adenophorae0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with SCe0
- Outcome
- nitrogen and phosphorus contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with SC or SC + BC notably increased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of A. adenophora , therefore enhancing its competitiveness.”
Claim · model-written summary
SC plus BC inoculation increased nitrogen and phosphorus content of Ageratina, enhancing competitiveness.
- Taxon
- A. adenophora
Ageratina adenophorae0 - Treatment
- SC + BCe0
- Outcome
- nitrogen and phosphorus contentse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation with SC or SC + BC notably increased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of A. adenophora , therefore enhancing its competitiveness.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual SC and BC inoculation increased AMF colonization rate and Bacillus density compared with single inoculation.
- Taxon
- A. adenophora
Ageratina adenophorae1 - Treatment
- dual inoculation with SC and BCe0
- Outcome
- AMF colonization rate and Bacillus densitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- single inoculatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Compared with single inoculation, dual inoculation with SC and BC increased AMF colonization rate and Bacillus density”
e1“the competitive growth of A. adenophora .”
The same questions in other papers
Bacillus cereus · growth · Ageratina adenophoraResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · growth · Ageratina adenophoraPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Ageratina adenophoraResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.