Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Effects of Septoglomus constrictum and Bacillus cereus on the competitive growth of Ageratina adenophora

Ewei Du; Yaping Chen; Yang Li; et al.

10
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Beneficial microorganisms play a pivotal role in the invasion process of exotic plants, including arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Bacillus . However, limited research exists on the synergistic influence of AMF and Bacillus on the competition between both invasive and native plants. In this study, pot cultures of Ageratina adenophora monoculture, Rabdosia amethystoides monoculture, and A. adenophora and R. amethystoides mixture were used to investigate the effects of dominant AMF ( Septoglomus constrictum , SC) and Bacillus cereus (BC), and the co-inoculation of BC and SC on the competitive growth of A. adenophora . The results showed that inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides . Additionally, inoculation with BC increased the biomass of R. amethystoides by 185.07%, while inoculation with SC or BC + SC decreased R. amethystoides biomass by 37.31 and 59.70% compared to the uninoculated treatment. Inoculation with BC significantly increased the nutrient contents in the rhizosphere soil of both plants and promoted their growth. Inoculation with SC or SC + BC notably increased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of A. adenophora , therefore enhancing its competitiveness. Compared with single inoculation, dual inoculation with SC and BC increased AMF colonization rate and Bacillus density, indicating that SC and BC can form a synergistic effect to further enhance the growth and competitiveness of A. adenophora . This study reveals the distinct role of S. constrictum and B. cereus during the invasion of A. adenophora , and provide new clues to the underlying mechanisms of interaction between invasive plant, AMF and Bacillus .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus cereus inoculation increased Ageratina biomass by 14.77% during competition with Rabdosia.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
inoculation with BCe0
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse1symbiont
Outcome
biomass of A. adenophorae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.77e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus cereus (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Septoglomus constrictum inoculation increased Ageratina biomass by 112.07% during competition.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
SCe0
Interactor
Septoglomus constrictumSeptoglomus constrictume1symbiont
Outcome
biomass of A. adenophorae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
112.07e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“Septoglomus constrictum , SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined BC and SC inoculation increased Ageratina biomass by 197.74% during competition.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
BC + SCe0
Outcome
biomass of A. adenophorae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
197.74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with BC, SC, and BC + SC significantly increased the biomass of A. adenophora by 14.77, 112.07, and 197.74%, respectively, in the competitive growth between A. adenophora and R. amethystoides .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC inoculation increased Rabdosia biomass by 185.07%.

Taxon
R. amethystoidesIsodon amethystoidese0
Treatment
inoculation with BCe0
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse1symbiont
Outcome
biomass of R. amethystoidese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
185.07%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Isodon amethystoides
Isodon amethystoides · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with BC increased the biomass of R. amethystoides by 185.07%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–946 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bacillus cereus (BC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SC inoculation decreased Rabdosia biomass by 37.31% versus uninoculated treatment.

Taxon
R. amethystoidesIsodon amethystoidese0
Treatment
inoculation with SCe0
Interactor
Septoglomus constrictumSeptoglomus constrictume1symbiont
Outcome
R. amethystoides biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
37.31e0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Isodon amethystoides
Isodon amethystoides · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with SC or BC + SC decreased R. amethystoides biomass by 37.31 and 59.70% compared to the uninoculated treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“Septoglomus constrictum , SC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BC and SC coinoculation decreased Rabdosia biomass by 59.70% versus uninoculated treatment.

Taxon
R. amethystoidesIsodon amethystoidese0
Treatment
BC + SCe0
Outcome
R. amethystoides biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
59.70%e0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Isodon amethystoides
Isodon amethystoides · Taxon阿橋 HQ · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with SC or BC + SC decreased R. amethystoides biomass by 37.31 and 59.70% compared to the uninoculated treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BC inoculation increased rhizosphere soil nutrient content for both plants and promoted their growth.

Taxon
Ageratina adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae1
Treatment
Inoculation with BCe0
Outcome
nutrient contents in the rhizosphere soil of both plants and promoted their growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with BC significantly increased the nutrient contents in the rhizosphere soil of both plants and promoted their growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1211 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ageratina adenophora monoculture, Rabdosia amethystoides monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SC inoculation increased nitrogen and phosphorus content of Ageratina, enhancing competitiveness.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
Inoculation with SCe0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with SC or SC + BC notably increased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of A. adenophora , therefore enhancing its competitiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SC plus BC inoculation increased nitrogen and phosphorus content of Ageratina, enhancing competitiveness.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
SC + BCe0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with SC or SC + BC notably increased the nitrogen and phosphorus contents of A. adenophora , therefore enhancing its competitiveness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual SC and BC inoculation increased AMF colonization rate and Bacillus density compared with single inoculation.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae1
Treatment
dual inoculation with SC and BCe0
Outcome
AMF colonization rate and Bacillus densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
single inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with single inoculation, dual inoculation with SC and BC increased AMF colonization rate and Bacillus density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“the competitive growth of A. adenophora .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–629 · show in text ↑

Bacillus cereus · growth · Ageratina adenophoraResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · growth · Ageratina adenophoraPositive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Ageratina adenophoraResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.