Paper · 2023 · Biotechnology Journal International

Effect of Cyanobacterial Combinations on Peanut Yield

Gehan Mohamed Salem; Alaa Abd Elghany Shaheen; Mona Fekry Ghazal

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The characteristics of two cyanobacterial strains, Anabaena oryzae and Nostoc muscorum, were studied in order to use them as biofertilizers in a field experiment conducted in the two winter seasons of 2021 and 2022 at the Ismailia Agricultural Research Center Station to study the effect of both strains on peanut plant in sandy soil. Cyanobacterial strains were used individually by coating seed, soil drench, and foliar applications, as well as mixed applications of two strains in various ways. Both cyanobacterial strains morphological examination revealed that they both have heterocysts, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in their culture filtrate, and they were able to produce chlorophyll a and phosphatase enzymes. The results of an agricultural experiment showed that using Nostoc muscorum and Anabaena oryzae separately had a positive effect on peanut plants in a variety of applications, but combining both of these applications with 75% nitrogen increased the growth traits, nutrient contents, and soil biological activities in both peanut plants and their rhizosphere soil. The soil drench treatment with A. oryzae and Nostoc muscorum plus 75% nitrogen produced the highest growth results and peanut yields in a single application. The A. oryzae Soil Drench Application (S) + N. muscorum Foliar Application (F) with 75% N reported the best outcomes in mixed treatments. However, compared to single applications, all blended applications displayed better growth and yield characteristics. The results of the study suggest that employing cyanobacteria in a mixed application will enhance its advantages over a single use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cyanobacterial strains had heterocysts and produced chlorophyll a and phosphatase enzymes.

Taxon
cyanobacterial strainse0
Outcome
heterocysts, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in their culture filtratee0

Verbatim

e0

“cyanobacterial strains morphological examination revealed that they both have heterocysts, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in their culture filtrate, and they were able to produce chlorophyll a and phosphatase enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Separate use of either cyanobacterial strain had a positive effect on peanut plants.

Taxon
peanut plantsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Nostoc muscorum and Anabaena oryzaee0
Interactor
Nostoc muscorum and Anabaena oryzaeDesmonostoc muscorumNostoc oryzaee0symbiont
Outcome
peanut plantse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using Nostoc muscorum and Anabaena oryzae separately had a positive effect on peanut plants in a variety of applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–900 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining the cyanobacteria with 75% nitrogen increased peanut growth traits, nutrient contents, and rhizosphere soil biological activities.

Taxon
peanut plantsArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
75% nitrogene0
Outcome
growth traits, nutrient contents, and soil biological activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combining both of these applications with 75% nitrogen increased the growth traits, nutrient contents, and soil biological activities in both peanut plants and their rhizosphere soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1088 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil drenching with both strains plus 75% nitrogen gave the highest growth and yield among single applications.

Treatment
soil drench treatment with A. oryzae and Nostoc muscorum plus 75% nitrogene0
Interactor
A. oryzae and Nostoc muscorumDesmonostoc muscorumNostoc oryzaee0symbiont
Outcome
growth results and peanut yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
single applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil drench treatment with A. oryzae and Nostoc muscorum plus 75% nitrogen produced the highest growth results and peanut yields in a single application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. oryzae soil drench plus N. muscorum foliar application and 75% nitrogen performed best among mixed treatments.

Treatment
A. oryzae Soil Drench Application (S) + N. muscorum Foliar Application (F) with 75% Ne0
Interactor
A. oryzaeNostoc oryzaee0symbiont
Second interactor
N. muscorumDesmonostoc muscorume0symbiont
Outcome
outcomese0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
mixed treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The A. oryzae Soil Drench Application (S) + N. muscorum Foliar Application (F) with 75% N reported the best outcomes in mixed treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All blended applications improved growth and yield relative to single applications.

Treatment
blended applicationse0
Outcome
growth and yield characteristicse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
single applicationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“compared to single applications, all blended applications displayed better growth and yield characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1502 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend mixed cyanobacterial applications over single use.

Treatment
cyanobacteriae0
Outcome
mixed applicatione0
Direction
enhancee0
Comparator
single usee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“employing cyanobacteria in a mixed application will enhance its advantages over a single use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1634 · show in text ↑

Nostoc oryzae · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

145 papers: 125 positive, 20 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.