Paper · 2023 · Water

Identifying the Influencing Factors of Plastic Film Mulching on Improving the Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Potato in the Northwest China

Juzhen Xu; Yanbo Wang; Yuanquan Chen; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Potato is an important crop in the Northwest China, however, its production is constrained by water scarcity. Plastic mulching film is an efficient technical measure to alleviate potato production restrictions. Therefore, studying the response of potato yield and water use efficiency to plastic mulching film is of great significance. The study conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the effect of plastic film on potato yield and water use efficiency in the Northwest. The study then quantified the effects of different levels of natural conditions (mean annual precipitation, mean annual accumulated temperature ≥ 10 °C), fertilizer application (nitrogen fertilizer, phosphate fertilizer, potassium fertilizer), cultivation measures (planting density, cultivation method, mulching method), and mulching properties (mulching color, mulching thickness) through subgroups analysis. Finally, the random forest model was used to quantify the importance of factors. Plastic film mulching increased yield by 27.17% and water use efficiency by 27.16%, which had a better performance under relatively lower mean annual precipitation, low mean annual accumulated temperature ≥ 10 °C, relatively lower fertilizer application, planting density of 15,000–45,000 plants·ha−1, ridge, and black mulching. Natural conditions, fertilization measures were vital to improve productivity. The research results can provide reference for agricultural management strategies of potato cultivation using plastic film in the Northwest China and other potato-producing areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film mulching increased potato yield by 27.17%.

Treatment
Plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic film mulching increased yield by 27.17% and water use efficiency by 27.16%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic film mulching increased potato water use efficiency by 27.16%.

Treatment
Plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plastic film mulching increased yield by 27.17% and water use efficiency by 27.16%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching performed better under lower precipitation and low accumulated temperature.

Outcome
better performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Setting
relatively lower mean annual precipitation, low mean annual accumulated temperature ≥ 10 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which had a better performance under relatively lower mean annual precipitation, low mean annual accumulated temperature ≥ 10 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching performed better under lower fertilizer application.

Treatment
relatively lower fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
lower fertilizer applicatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relatively lower fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching performed better at a planting density of 15,000–45,000 plants·ha−1.

Treatment
planting density of 15,000–45,000 plants·ha−1e0
Outcome
planting densitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting density of 15,000–45,000 plants·ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mulching performed better with ridge cultivation.

Treatment
ridgee0
Outcome
ridgee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ridge, and black mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black mulching performed better.

Treatment
black mulchinge0
Outcome
black mulchinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ridge, and black mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural conditions and fertilization measures were important for productivity.

Treatment
fertilization measurese0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
improvee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Natural conditions, fertilization measures were vital to improve productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–118 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

64 papers: 57 positive, 7 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.