Paper · 2010 · THE SCIENTIFIC TEMPER

EFFECT OF BIO-FERTILIZER AND ORGANIC MANURES ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF GUAVA CV. RED FLESHED

Deepa H. Dwivedi; Rubee Lata; R. B. Ram

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted on 4-year old guava trees during 2007-08to study the “Effect of Bio-fertilizer and organic manures on yield and quality ofguava cv. Red Fleshed”. Average maximum fruit yield for the rainy and winterseason crop was 38.23 kg/tree and 19.03 kg/tree respectively, with 250g Azotobactor+ 20 kg FYM. Vermicompost (20kg/tree) had significantly higher yield over controland was recommended as 3rd best treatment among all regarding the yield. Highestfruit weight 198.2g and 299.2g, fruit length 5.9cm and 7.19cm and fruit breadth7cm and 7.41cm for rainy and winter season crop, respectively, were obtainedwith the application of Phosphobacterin (50ml/tree), which was, however at parwith that obtained with VAM (10 kg/tree). Highest TSS (16.07 OB and 17.9 0B) forrainy and winter season crop, respectively, as well as Vitamin C (189.57 mg/100g)was obtained with the application of VAM. Acidity was not influenced by theapplication of bio-fertilizer. However, acidity was highest (0.54 %) under FYMtreatment. From the present study, it can be concluded that the application of biofertilizerwas more effective than organic manures in enhancing fruit growthparameters in guava in both seasons. When bio-fertilizers were grouped together,P-solubilizers were found to have more beneficial influence on fruit physicochemicalcharacteristics of guava cv. Red Fleshed as compared to N-fixers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobactor plus FYM produced maximum rainy-season fruit yield of 38.23 kg/tree.

Treatment
250g Azotobactor+ 20 kg FYMe0
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
38.23 kg/treee0
Qualifier
rainye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average maximum fruit yield for the rainy and winterseason crop was 38.23 kg/tree and 19.03 kg/tree respectively, with 250g Azotobactor+ 20 kg FYM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobactor plus FYM produced maximum winter fruit yield of 19.03 kg/tree.

Treatment
250g Azotobactor+ 20 kg FYMe0
Interactor
Azotobactore0symbiont
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
19.03 kg/treee0
Qualifier
winterseasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average maximum fruit yield for the rainy and winterseason crop was 38.23 kg/tree and 19.03 kg/tree respectively, with 250g Azotobactor+ 20 kg FYM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–321 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vermicompost significantly raised yield over control.

Treatment
Vermicompost (20kg/tree)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vermicompost (20kg/tree) had significantly higher yield over controland was recommended as 3rd best treatment among all regarding the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphobacterin produced highest rainy-season fruit weight of 198.2g.

Treatment
Phosphobacterin (50ml/tree)e0
Interactor
Phosphobacterine0symbiont
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
198.2ge0
Qualifier
rainye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highestfruit weight 198.2g and 299.2g, fruit length 5.9cm and 7.19cm and fruit breadth7cm and 7.41cm for rainy and winter season crop, respectively, were obtainedwith the application of Phosphobacterin (50ml/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphobacterin produced highest winter fruit weight of 299.2g.

Treatment
Phosphobacterin (50ml/tree)e0
Interactor
Phosphobacterine0symbiont
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
299.2ge0
Qualifier
wintere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highestfruit weight 198.2g and 299.2g, fruit length 5.9cm and 7.19cm and fruit breadth7cm and 7.41cm for rainy and winter season crop, respectively, were obtainedwith the application of Phosphobacterin (50ml/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphobacterin produced highest fruit lengths of 5.9cm in rainy and 7.19cm in winter crops.

Treatment
Phosphobacterine1
Outcome
fruit lengthe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
5.9cm and 7.19cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit length 5.9cm and 7.19cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of Phosphobacterin (50ml/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphobacterin produced highest fruit breadths of 7cm in rainy and 7.41cm in winter crops.

Treatment
Phosphobacterine1
Outcome
fruit breadthe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
7cm and 7.41cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit breadth7cm and 7.41cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–563 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of Phosphobacterin (50ml/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–676 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM produced highest TSS in both seasons.

Treatment
VAMe0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
16.07 OB and 17.9 0Be0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest TSS (16.07 OB and 17.9 0B) forrainy and winter season crop, respectively, as well as Vitamin C (189.57 mg/100g)was obtained with the application of VAM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VAM produced highest Vitamin C of 189.57 mg/100g.

Treatment
VAMe0
Outcome
Vitamin Ce0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
189.57 mg/100ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest TSS (16.07 OB and 17.9 0B) forrainy and winter season crop, respectively, as well as Vitamin C (189.57 mg/100g)was obtained with the application of VAM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer did not influence acidity.

Treatment
bio-fertilizere0
Outcome
Aciditye0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acidity was not influenced by theapplication of bio-fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidity was highest under FYM at 0.54%.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
aciditye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.54 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acidity was highest (0.54 %) under FYMtreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1027 · show in text ↑
t0

“GUAVA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Results differ

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 74 positive, 2 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.