Abstract
Dry direct seeding cultivation technology of rice is an important aspect of rice production and management. Six treatments were designed in this paper, and that is, T1 (conventional irrigation), T2 (conventional irrigation + conditioner), T3 (30% water-saving irrigation), T4 (30% water-saving irrigation + conditioner), T5 (50% water-saving irrigation), T6 (50% water-saving irrigation + conditioner). The results showed that in the three separate irrigation treatments, 30% water-saving irrigation was conducive to the growth of dry direct seeding rice at the tillering stage, jointing and booting stage, and 50% water-saving irrigation was more conducive to the growth of rice at grain filling stage. Compared with no application of amendments, all kinds of treatments could significantly promote the growth of dry direct seeding rice. Under the condition of water-saving irrigation of 30%, higher dry matter quality, yield and nutrient absorption can be obtained. The total dry matter quality and rice yield of T4 treatment with 30% water-saving irrigation and conditioner were the highest, which were 99.90 g/pot and 37.76 g/pot respectively, compared with conventional treatment (T1) was 37.60% and 45.96% higher, and this treatment had obvious effect on nitrogen and potassium absorption. In terms of quality impact, water saving was 30% Irrigation conditions are conducive to the improvement of rice processing quality, appearance quality and nutritional quality, especially after the application of conditioner, the overall rice quality is improved. This study has a certain reference value for water-saving irrigation, promoting nutrient utilization, stable yield and high quality of dry direct seeding rice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Thirty percent water-saving irrigation favored growth at tillering, jointing and booting.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Organ / stage
- tillering stage, jointing and booting stagee0
- Treatment
- 30% water-saving irrigatione0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- conducivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“30% water-saving irrigation was conducive to the growth of dry direct seeding rice at the tillering stage, jointing and booting stage”
Claim · model-written summary
Fifty percent water-saving irrigation favored growth at grain filling.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Organ / stage
- grain filling stagee0
- Treatment
- 50% water-saving irrigatione0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- more conducivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“50% water-saving irrigation was more conducive to the growth of rice at grain filling stage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Amendment application significantly promoted rice growth.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- all kinds of treatmentse0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- promotee0
- Comparator
- no application of amendmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with no application of amendments, all kinds of treatments could significantly promote the growth of dry direct seeding rice.”
Claim · model-written summary
Thirty percent water-saving irrigation increased dry matter quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- water-saving irrigation of 30%e0
- Outcome
- dry matter qualitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under the condition of water-saving irrigation of 30%, higher dry matter quality, yield and nutrient absorption can be obtained.”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
Thirty percent water-saving irrigation increased yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- water-saving irrigation of 30%e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under the condition of water-saving irrigation of 30%, higher dry matter quality, yield and nutrient absorption can be obtained.”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
Thirty percent water-saving irrigation increased nutrient absorption.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- water-saving irrigation of 30%e0
- Outcome
- nutrient absorptione0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Under the condition of water-saving irrigation of 30%, higher dry matter quality, yield and nutrient absorption can be obtained.”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 dry matter was highest at 99.90 g/pot, 37.60% above T1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- T4 treatment with 30% water-saving irrigation and conditionere0
- Outcome
- total dry matter qualitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 99.90 g/pote0
- Qualifier
- 37.60%e0
- Comparator
- conventional treatment (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The total dry matter quality and rice yield of T4 treatment with 30% water-saving irrigation and conditioner were the highest, which were 99.90 g/pot and 37.76 g/pot respectively, compared with conventional treatment (T1) was 37.60% and 45.96% higher”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 rice yield was highest at 37.76 g/pot, 45.96% above T1.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- T4 treatment with 30% water-saving irrigation and conditionere0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 37.76 g/pote0
- Qualifier
- 45.96%e0
- Comparator
- conventional treatment (T1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The total dry matter quality and rice yield of T4 treatment with 30% water-saving irrigation and conditioner were the highest, which were 99.90 g/pot and 37.76 g/pot respectively, compared with conventional treatment (T1) was 37.60% and 45.96% higher”
Claim · model-written summary
T4 visibly affected nitrogen and potassium absorption.
- Taxon
- RICEOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- this treatmente0
- Outcome
- nitrogen and potassium absorptione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“this treatment had obvious effect on nitrogen and potassium absorption.”
t0“RICE”
Claim · model-written summary
Thirty percent water-saving irrigation improved rice processing, appearance and nutritional quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- water saving was 30% Irrigation conditionse0
- Outcome
- rice processing quality, appearance quality and nutritional qualitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“water saving was 30% Irrigation conditions are conducive to the improvement of rice processing quality, appearance quality and nutritional quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Conditioner further improved overall rice quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- application of conditionere0
- Outcome
- overall rice qualitye0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“especially after the application of conditioner, the overall rice quality is improved.”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →irrigation · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
287 papers more in this group
See all 291 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.