Paper · 2023 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of several reduced-risk insecticides on the population of Bemisia tabaci Genn. and incidence of pepper yellow leaf curl Indonesia virus (PepYLCIV) on chili plants

I K Amaliah; I D Daud; A Nasruddin

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Tobacco whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Genn. can directly, and indirectly damage chili plants by sucking the plant sap and transmitting Pepper yellow leaf curl Indonesia virus (PepYLCIV), respectively. Farmers control PepYLCIV by using synthetic insecticides with 2-3 applications a week to suppress the vector population. The intensive use of insecticide raises concern about potential detrimental effects on the environment and non-target organisms. An alternative control measure for B. tabaci is the use of reduced-risk insecticides that are effective but safer. Thus, the study aimed to determine the effectiveness of various reduced-risk insecticides in reducing the whitefly population and PepYLCIV incidence. This experiment consisted of 12 treatments using insecticides of abamectin, azadiractin, imidacloprid, deltamethrin, spinosad, and water (control), applied once and twice a week. The results showed that the low-risk insecticides had no significant effect on the numbers of adults and nymphs of B. tabaci and the PepYLCIV incidence. Imidacloprid had significantly lower egg number and PepYLCIV incidence than the control and the other insecticide treatments. Our results also showed that B. tabaci populations were low throughout the season but the incidences of PepYLCIV were relatively high. This indicated a possibility that PepYLCIV is seed-borne.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced-risk insecticides had no significant effect on adult and nymph whitefly counts.

Taxon
chili plantst0
Treatment
low-risk insecticidese0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
numbers of adults and nymphs of B. tabacie0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low-risk insecticides had no significant effect on the numbers of adults and nymphs of B. tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced-risk insecticides had no significant effect on PepYLCIV incidence.

Taxon
chili plantst0
Treatment
low-risk insecticidese0
Interactor
PepYLCIVe0pathogen
Outcome
PepYLCIV incidencee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“low-risk insecticides had no significant effect on the numbers of adults and nymphs of B. tabaci and the PepYLCIV incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid significantly lowered whitefly egg numbers versus control and other insecticides.

Taxon
chili plantst0
Treatment
Imidaclopride0
Interactor
Bemisia tabaci Genn.Bemisia tabacit0peste0
Outcome
egg numbere0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the control and the other insecticide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid had significantly lower egg number and PepYLCIV incidence than the control and the other insecticide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bemisia tabaci Genn. and incidence of pepper yellow leaf curl Indonesia virus (PepYLCIV) on chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid significantly lowered PepYLCIV incidence versus control and other insecticides.

Taxon
chili plantst0
Treatment
Imidaclopride0
Interactor
PepYLCIVe0pathogen
Outcome
PepYLCIV incidencee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the control and the other insecticide treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid had significantly lower egg number and PepYLCIV incidence than the control and the other insecticide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly populations stayed low throughout the season.

Taxon
chili plantst0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
B. tabaci populationse0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. tabaci populations were low throughout the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1259 · show in text ↑
t0

“chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PepYLCIV incidence remained relatively high.

Taxon
chili plantst0
Interactor
PepYLCIVe0pathogen
Outcome
incidences of PepYLCIVe0
Direction
relatively highe0

Verbatim

e0

“incidences of PepYLCIV were relatively high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1311 · show in text ↑
t0

“chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–169 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggested PepYLCIV may be seed-borne.

Taxon
chili plantst0
Interactor
PepYLCIVe0pathogen
Outcome
PepYLCIV is seed-bornee0
Qualifier
possibilitye0

Verbatim

e0

“This indicated a possibility that PepYLCIV is seed-borne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“chili plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–169 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Bemisia tabaci · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

insecticide · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · Bemisia tabaci · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.