Paper · 2016 · Annals of Plant Protection Sciences

Incidence, detection and integrated management of viral disease complex in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam

Borsha Rani Baruah; Anurag Kashyap; Paras Nath

16
claims
46
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Double antibody sandwich ELISA (DAS-ELISA) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays detected the infection of four viruses viz., Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), Potato virus Y (PVY), Groundnut Bud Necrosis Virus (GBNV) and Chilli leaf curl virus (ChLCV) in Bhut Jolokia with 55.0% infection by CMV, 36.0% by PVY, 44.9% by GBNV and 42.5% by ChLCV in Assam. Plants were found to be infected by single virus or more than one virus together forming a disease complex. The various symptoms manifested by these viruses on Bhut Jolokia includes mosaic, puckering, dwarfing, leaf size reduction, upward and downward curling of leaves, flower bud necrosis, etc. An integrated management approach which included treatments in nursery and main field condition, was developed in order to combat the infection of the plants due to viral disease complex. Among the treatment combinations, T12 [seed treatment with imidacloprid@0.25 ml/l + nursery net+ foliar spray with imidacloprid @ 2ml/l at 15, 30, 45, 60 DAT] was the most effective in reduction of disease incidence and vector population count with maximum yield of 91.27 q/ha. Disease incidence of 14.8% (CMV+PVY), 7.4% (ChLCV), 11.1% (GBNV) with average of 11.1% and average vector population count of 3.19 nos.(aphid), 3.43 nos.(whitefly) and 16.33 nos.(thrips) were recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CMV infected 55.0% of Bhut Jolokia chilli plants in Assam.

Taxon
Chillit0
Material
Bhut Jolokiat0
Interactor
CMVcucumber mosaic cucumoviruse0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Value
55.0%e0
Setting
Assame1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“with 55.0% infection by CMV, 36.0% by PVY, 44.9% by GBNV and 42.5% by ChLCV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–344 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PVY infected 36.0% of Bhut Jolokia chilli plants in Assam.

Taxon
Chillit0
Material
Bhut Jolokiat0
Interactor
PVYPotato virus Ye0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Value
36.0%e0
Setting
Assame1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Potato virus Y
Potato virus Y · InteractorMahmoud Hamdy Abd El-Aziz, Plant Pathology Institute, Agricultural. Research Center, Alexandria, Egyp · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“with 55.0% infection by CMV, 36.0% by PVY, 44.9% by GBNV and 42.5% by ChLCV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–344 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GBNV infected 44.9% of Bhut Jolokia chilli plants in Assam.

Taxon
Chillit0
Material
Bhut Jolokiat0
Interactor
GBNVGroundnut bud necrosis viruse0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Value
44.9%e0
Setting
Assame1

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“with 55.0% infection by CMV, 36.0% by PVY, 44.9% by GBNV and 42.5% by ChLCV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–344 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ChLCV infected 42.5% of Bhut Jolokia chilli plants in Assam.

Taxon
Chillit0
Material
Bhut Jolokiat0
Interactor
ChLCVe0pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Value
42.5%e0
Setting
Assame1

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“with 55.0% infection by CMV, 36.0% by PVY, 44.9% by GBNV and 42.5% by ChLCV”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–344 · show in text ↑
e1

“in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–353 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilli plants were infected by a single virus or by several viruses together, forming a disease complex.

Taxon
Chillit0
Interactor
viruse2pathogen
Outcome
infected by single virus or more than one virus together forming a disease complexe2

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants were found to be infected by single virus or more than one virus together forming a disease complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–461 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Viral infection on Bhut Jolokia chilli produced mosaic, puckering and dwarfing symptoms.

Taxon
Chillit0
Material
Bhut Jolokiae3
Interactor
virusesVirusese3pathogen
Outcome
mosaic, puckering, dwarfinge3

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“The various symptoms manifested by these viruses on Bhut Jolokia includes mosaic, puckering, dwarfing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–564 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Viral infection on Bhut Jolokia chilli produced leaf size reduction, upward and downward leaf curling and flower bud necrosis.

Taxon
Chillit0
Outcome
leaf size reduction, upward and downward curling of leaves, flower bud necrosise4

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“leaf size reduction, upward and downward curling of leaves, flower bud necrosis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–645 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated management treatment T12 was the most effective in reducing disease incidence and vector population count in chilli.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid@0.25 ml/l + nursery net+ foliar spray with imidacloprid @ 2ml/l at 15, 30, 45, 60 DATe5
Outcome
disease incidence and vector population counte5
Direction
reductione5
Comparator
controle6

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“T12 [seed treatment with imidacloprid@0.25 ml/l + nursery net+ foliar spray with imidacloprid @ 2ml/l at 15, 30, 45, 60 DAT] was the most effective in reduction of disease incidence and vector population count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1083 · show in text ↑
e6

“which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1384 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T12 gave a maximum yield of 91.27 q/ha in chilli.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid@0.25 ml/l + nursery net+ foliar spray with imidacloprid @ 2ml/l at 15, 30, 45, 60 DATe5
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
maximume7
Value
91.27 q/hae7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“T12 [seed treatment with imidacloprid@0.25 ml/l + nursery net+ foliar spray with imidacloprid @ 2ml/l at 15, 30, 45, 60 DAT] was the most effective in reduction of disease incidence and vector population count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1083 · show in text ↑
e7

“with maximum yield of 91.27 q/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence of CMV+PVY in T12 was 14.8%, much lower than control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
T12e6
Interactor
CMVcucumber mosaic cucumoviruse5pathogen
Second interactor
PVYPotato virus Ye5pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee5
Direction
much lessere6
Value
14.8%e5
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

cucumber mosaic cucumovirus
cucumber mosaic cucumovirus · InteractorDieterO · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Potato virus Y
Potato virus Y · Second interactorMahmoud Hamdy Abd El-Aziz, Plant Pathology Institute, Agricultural. Research Center, Alexandria, Egyp · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
e5

“Disease incidence of 14.8% (CMV+PVY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence of ChLCV in T12 was 7.4%, much lower than control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
T12e6
Interactor
ChLCVe5pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee5
Direction
much lessere6
Value
7.4%e5
Comparator
controle6

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
e5

“Disease incidence of 14.8% (CMV+PVY), 7.4% (ChLCV), 11.1% (GBNV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease incidence of GBNV in T12 was 11.1%, much lower than control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
T12e6
Interactor
GBNVGroundnut bud necrosis viruse5pathogen
Outcome
Disease incidencee5
Direction
much lessere6
Value
11.1%e5
Comparator
controle6

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
e5

“Disease incidence of 14.8% (CMV+PVY), 7.4% (ChLCV), 11.1% (GBNV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid population count in T12 was 3.19 nos., much lower than control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
T12e6
Interactor
aphide4pest
Outcome
average vector population counte4
Direction
much lessere6
Value
3.19 nos.e4
Comparator
controle6

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
e4

“average vector population count of 3.19 nos.(aphid), 3.43 nos.(whitefly) and 16.33 nos.(thrips)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whitefly population count in T12 was 3.43 nos., much lower than control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
T12e6
Interactor
whiteflye4pest
Outcome
average vector population counte4
Direction
much lessere6
Value
3.43 nos.e4
Comparator
controle6

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
e4

“average vector population count of 3.19 nos.(aphid), 3.43 nos.(whitefly) and 16.33 nos.(thrips)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thrips population count in T12 was 16.33 nos., much lower than control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
T12e6
Interactor
thripsThripse4pest
Outcome
average vector population counte4
Direction
much lessere6
Value
16.33 nos.e4
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Thrips
Thrips · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
e4

“average vector population count of 3.19 nos.(aphid), 3.43 nos.(whitefly) and 16.33 nos.(thrips)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average disease incidence in T12 was 11.1%, much lower than control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
T12e6
Outcome
Disease incidencee5
Direction
much lessere6
Value
average of 11.1%e7
Comparator
controle6

Verbatim

t0

“in Bhut Jolokia, a Chilli cultivar in Assam”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–115 · show in text ↑
e6

“recorded in the treatment T12 which was much lesser as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1384 · show in text ↑
e5

“Disease incidence of 14.8% (CMV+PVY), 7.4% (ChLCV), 11.1% (GBNV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1182 · show in text ↑
e7

“with average of 11.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1204 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

transplanting · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 73 positive, 1 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

transplanting · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

trap barrier · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.