Abstract
The performance of capsicum crop in open field and under covered cultivation was evaluated at Precision Farming Development Centre experimental field at Bhopal during December, 2011 to May, 2012. Under covered cultivation, black colour shade net having 50% shade factor was used in the study. Same crop cultural practices in the open field and under covered cultivation were adopted for comparison. Drip irrigation system was adopted in both the cases and irrigation system parameters such as frequency of irrigation and wetting pattern were collected. Other parameters such as soil temperature, duration of the crop, morphological parameters of the crop and yield were monitored. The study revealed that under shade net the crop yield was increased by 80 per cent over open field cultivation along with water saving of about 40 per cent in covered cultivation. The wetting pattern from the emitting device of 2 lph indicated maximum spread of 40 cm from emitter in case of crop under covered cultivation where as in open field the spread was 25 cm. Duration of the crop was also extended by 40 more days under covered cultivation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Under shade net, capsicum crop yield increased by 80% over open field cultivation.
- Treatment
- under shade nete0
- Outcome
- crop yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 80 per cente0
- Qualifier
- black colour shade net having 50% shade factore4
- Comparator
- open field cultivatione0
CapsicumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Performance Evaluation of Capsicum Crop in Open Field and under Covered Cultivation”
e0“under shade net the crop yield was increased by 80 per cent over open field cultivation”
e4“black colour shade net having 50% shade factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Covered cultivation saved about 40% water compared with open field.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Performance Evaluation of Capsicum Crop in Open Field and under Covered Cultivation”
e1“water saving of about 40 per cent in covered cultivation”
Claim · model-written summary
Under covered cultivation the wetting spread from a 2 lph emitter was maximum at 40 cm, against 25 cm in the open field.
- Treatment
- under covered cultivatione2
- Outcome
- spreade2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 40 cme2
- Qualifier
- 25 cme2
- Comparator
- in open fielde2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Performance Evaluation of Capsicum Crop in Open Field and under Covered Cultivation”
e2“The wetting pattern from the emitting device of 2 lph indicated maximum spread of 40 cm from emitter in case of crop under covered cultivation where as in open field the spread was 25 cm”
Claim · model-written summary
Covered cultivation extended the crop duration by 40 more days.
- Treatment
- under covered cultivatione3
- Outcome
- Duration of the crope3
- Direction
- extendede3
- Value
- 40 more dayse3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Performance Evaluation of Capsicum Crop in Open Field and under Covered Cultivation”
e3“Duration of the crop was also extended by 40 more days under covered cultivation”
The same questions in other papers
shade · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →trap barrier · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.