Abstract
Low temperature is one of the most important abiotic factor that restrict the optimal production of warm-season vegetables in the cold mountain regions. Studies were conducted to establish the possibility of growing capsicum, a temperature sensitive crop, in a naturally ventilated passive solar greenhouse with high temperature amplitude (25.2±2.5ºC). Despite the temperature fluctuation from 6.8±2.9°C at night to 38.6±4.1°C day temperature, flowering and fruiting were seen. The salable yield inside the greenhouse was 4.5 to 4.8-fold higher that of open field. Red shade net combine with the greenhouse technology significantly increased the intercellular CO2 concentration but affected the photosynthetic rate. Shading delayed flowering and 51-59% reduction in salable fruit yield. Total phenolic contents (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC) of capsicum grown under open field and greenhouse were similar. However, shading reduced the TPC and TFC by 35.2% and 14.6%, respectively inside the greenhouse.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Capsicum flowered and fruited despite temperature fluctuations.
- Outcome
- flowering and fruiting were seene0
- Qualifier
- temperature fluctuation from 6.8±2.9°C at night to 38.6±4.1°C day temperaturee0
CapsicumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Despite the temperature fluctuation from 6.8±2.9°C at night to 38.6±4.1°C day temperature, flowering and fruiting were seen.”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse salable yield was 4.5 to 4.8-fold higher than open-field yield.
- Treatment
- inside the greenhousee0
- Outcome
- salable yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.5 to 4.8-folde0
- Comparator
- open fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The salable yield inside the greenhouse was 4.5 to 4.8-fold higher that of open field.”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Red shade net in the greenhouse increased intercellular CO2 concentration.
- Treatment
- Red shade net combine with the greenhouse technologye0
- Outcome
- intercellular CO2 concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Red shade net combine with the greenhouse technology significantly increased the intercellular CO2 concentration but affected the photosynthetic rate.”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Red shade net affected the photosynthetic rate, with direction unstated.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Red shade net combine with the greenhouse technology significantly increased the intercellular CO2 concentration but affected the photosynthetic rate.”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading delayed capsicum flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading delayed flowering and 51-59% reduction in salable fruit yield.”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading reduced salable fruit yield by 51-59%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading delayed flowering and 51-59% reduction in salable fruit yield.”
t0“capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were similar in open field and greenhouse capsicum.
- Outcome
- Total phenolic contents (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC)e0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- open field and greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total phenolic contents (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC) of capsicum grown under open field and greenhouse were similar.”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse shading reduced total phenolic contents by 35.2%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“shading reduced the TPC and TFC by 35.2% and 14.6%, respectively inside the greenhouse.”
e1“Total phenolic contents (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC) of capsicum grown under open field and greenhouse were similar.”
Claim · model-written summary
Greenhouse shading reduced total flavonoid contents by 14.6%.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“shading reduced the TPC and TFC by 35.2% and 14.6%, respectively inside the greenhouse.”
e1“Total phenolic contents (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC) of capsicum grown under open field and greenhouse were similar.”
The same questions in other papers
shade · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →shade · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
cultivation system · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.