Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Agriculture Extension and Social Development

Readings of chlorophyll meter used for tolerance of canola cultivars against aphid (L. erysimi K) hemiptera; Aphidadae under glass house conditions

Noor Muhammad; Shah Alam Khan

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study is designed to investigate whether chlorophyll meter content readings (SPAD) can be used as to determine the tolerance in canola cultivars against arthropods. 10 canola cultivars were tested for chlorophyll limits (SPAD readings) in un-infested & infested plants at four to six leaves stage, flowering stage and pod stage at 15 days interval of aphid infestation. Feeding by mustard aphid L. erysimi K caused significant loss of chlorophyll in the infested plants of leaves un-infested plants have significantly higher chlorophyll than infested plant. The results showed that among various cultivars of canola differed significantly amongst the un-infested & infested plants of different canola cultivars there is significant difference in chlorophyll content. The results was multiplication of aphids/plant infestation (70.83) revealed that aphid density was significantly higher on Abaseen (367.75 aphid/plant) and lower on KS-75 (162.00 aphid/plant). In control, (un-infested plant) KS-75 was significantly higher (44.00 chlorophyll content/leaf) and Oscar lower (41.00 chlorophyll content/leaf). Among the artificially aphid infested plants, KS-75 (23.75 chlorophyll content/leaf) followed by Oscar (21.00 chlorophyll content/leaf) significantly higher while Abaseen (12.25) followed by Zahoor (12.75) lower. The chlorophyll content losses were significantly higher in Omega (30.75) followed by Shiralee (30.25) and lower in KS-75 (20.25) followed by (20.75) in Oscar. In term of infestation cause significantly low in KS-75 (46.02%) followed by Oscar (49.70%) while high in Omega (71.10%) followed by Abaseen (70.83%) respectively. The chlorophyll meter readings a positive correlation between and (%) infestation was over time strengthening and culminated at the physiological harvesting stage. It was a clear indication that the potential of the chlorophyll meter readings has to be used for the selection of susceptible/tolerant cultivars and may permit modern canola crop in the climate change scenarios to be grown at wider range of environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard aphid feeding significantly reduced chlorophyll in infested canola leaves relative to uninfested leaves.

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Treatment
Feeding by mustard aphid L. erysimi Ke0
Interactor
mustard aphid L. erysimi Ke0pest
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
losse0
Comparator
un-infested plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Feeding by mustard aphid L. erysimi K caused significant loss of chlorophyll in the infested plants of leaves un-infested plants have significantly higher chlorophyll than infested plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola cultivars differed significantly in chlorophyll content under infestation states.

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is significant difference in chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid density was higher on Abaseen at 367.75 aphid/plant.

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Abaseene0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid densitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
367.75 aphid/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aphid density was significantly higher on Abaseen (367.75 aphid/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninfested KS-75 had higher chlorophyll content, 44.00 chlorophyll content/leaf.

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
KS-75e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content/leafe0
Direction
highere0
Value
44.00 chlorophyll content/leafe0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KS-75 was significantly higher (44.00 chlorophyll content/leaf)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninfested Oscar had lower chlorophyll content, 41.00 chlorophyll content/leaf.

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Oscare0
Outcome
chlorophyll content/leafe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
41.00 chlorophyll content/leafe0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Oscar lower (41.00 chlorophyll content/leaf)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In aphid-infested canola, KS-75 had higher chlorophyll content (23.75 chlorophyll content/leaf).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
KS-75e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content/leafe0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.75 chlorophyll content/leafe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the artificially aphid infested plants, KS-75 (23.75 chlorophyll content/leaf) followed by Oscar (21.00 chlorophyll content/leaf) significantly higher while Abaseen (12.25) followed by Zahoor (12.75) lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In aphid-infested canola, Oscar had higher chlorophyll content (21.00 chlorophyll content/leaf).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Oscare0
Outcome
chlorophyll content/leafe0
Direction
highere0
Value
21.00 chlorophyll content/leafe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the artificially aphid infested plants, KS-75 (23.75 chlorophyll content/leaf) followed by Oscar (21.00 chlorophyll content/leaf) significantly higher while Abaseen (12.25) followed by Zahoor (12.75) lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In aphid-infested canola, Abaseen had lower chlorophyll content (12.25).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Abaseene0
Outcome
chlorophyll content/leafe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
12.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the artificially aphid infested plants, KS-75 (23.75 chlorophyll content/leaf) followed by Oscar (21.00 chlorophyll content/leaf) significantly higher while Abaseen (12.25) followed by Zahoor (12.75) lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In aphid-infested canola, Zahoor had lower chlorophyll content (12.75).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Zahoore0
Outcome
chlorophyll content/leafe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
12.75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the artificially aphid infested plants, KS-75 (23.75 chlorophyll content/leaf) followed by Oscar (21.00 chlorophyll content/leaf) significantly higher while Abaseen (12.25) followed by Zahoor (12.75) lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1321 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll loss was higher in Omega (30.75).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Omegae0
Outcome
chlorophyll content lossese0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content losses were significantly higher in Omega (30.75) followed by Shiralee (30.25) and lower in KS-75 (20.25) followed by (20.75) in Oscar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll loss was higher in Shiralee (30.25).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Shiraleee0
Outcome
chlorophyll content lossese0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content losses were significantly higher in Omega (30.75) followed by Shiralee (30.25) and lower in KS-75 (20.25) followed by (20.75) in Oscar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll loss was lower in KS-75 (20.25).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
KS-75e0
Outcome
chlorophyll content lossese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20.25e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content losses were significantly higher in Omega (30.75) followed by Shiralee (30.25) and lower in KS-75 (20.25) followed by (20.75) in Oscar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll loss was lower in Oscar (20.75).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Oscare0
Outcome
chlorophyll content lossese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
20.75e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content losses were significantly higher in Omega (30.75) followed by Shiralee (30.25) and lower in KS-75 (20.25) followed by (20.75) in Oscar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation was low in KS-75 (46.02%).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
KS-75e0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
lowe0
Value
46.02%e0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In term of infestation cause significantly low in KS-75 (46.02%) followed by Oscar (49.70%) while high in Omega (71.10%) followed by Abaseen (70.83%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation was low in Oscar (49.70%).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Oscare0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
lowe0
Value
49.70%e0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In term of infestation cause significantly low in KS-75 (46.02%) followed by Oscar (49.70%) while high in Omega (71.10%) followed by Abaseen (70.83%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation was high in Omega (71.10%).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Omegae0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
highe0
Value
71.10%e0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In term of infestation cause significantly low in KS-75 (46.02%) followed by Oscar (49.70%) while high in Omega (71.10%) followed by Abaseen (70.83%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation was high in Abaseen (70.83%).

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Material
Abaseene0
Outcome
infestatione0
Direction
highe0
Value
70.83%e0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In term of infestation cause significantly low in KS-75 (46.02%) followed by Oscar (49.70%) while high in Omega (71.10%) followed by Abaseen (70.83%) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1645 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The correlation between chlorophyll meter readings and infestation percentage strengthened over time to physiological harvest.

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Organ / stage
physiological harvesting stagee0
Outcome
chlorophyll meter readingse0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
(%) infestatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll meter readings a positive correlation between and (%) infestation was over time strengthening and culminated at the physiological harvesting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1647–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest chlorophyll meter readings for selecting susceptible or tolerant canola cultivars.

Taxon
canola cultivarsBrassica napus var. napust0
Outcome
selection of susceptible/tolerant cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the potential of the chlorophyll meter readings has to be used for the selection of susceptible/tolerant cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1956 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–68 · show in text ↑

infection · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.