Paper · 1997 · Madras Agricultural Journal

IMPACT OF INSECTICIDES APPLIED IN THE NURSERY ON THE ARTHROPOD FAUNA OF RICE IN THE MAIN FIELD

GANESH KUMAR M; VELUSAMY R

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Application of cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not have a negative impact on the populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipes in the main field. However, cartap at higher dose and chlorpyriphos as seedling treatment were found safer to L. pseudoamulata. Application of cartap and carbofuran in the nursery five days before pulling cat was found to be very effective in containing the populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal. in the main field upto 40 days after transplaming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not negatively affect Lvcosa psendoannulaia populations in the rice main field.

Treatment
cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
Lvcosa psendoannulaiae0other
Outcome
populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaiae0
Direction
did not have a negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not have a negative impact on the populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipes in the main field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–215 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not negatively affect Tetragnatha javana populations in the rice main field.

Treatment
cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
Tetragnatha javanaTetragnatha javanae0other
Outcome
populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipese0
Direction
did not have a negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not have a negative impact on the populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipes in the main field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–215 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not negatively affect Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis populations in the rice main field.

Treatment
cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
Cyrtorrhinus lividipennise0other
Outcome
populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipese0
Direction
did not have a negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not have a negative impact on the populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipes in the main field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–215 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cartap at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not negatively affect Paders tuscipes populations in the rice main field.

Treatment
cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./hae0
Interactor
Paders tuscipese0other
Outcome
populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipese0
Direction
did not have a negative impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap in the nursery at 1.0 kg a.i./ha did not have a negative impact on the populations of Lvcosa psendoannulaia, Tetragnatha javana, Cyrtorrhinus lividipennis and Paders tuscipes in the main field.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–215 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher cartap dose was safer for L. pseudoamulata.

Treatment
cartap at higher dosee0
Interactor
L. pseudoamulatae0other
Outcome
safer to L. pseudoamulatae0
Direction
safere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, cartap at higher dose and chlorpyriphos as seedling treatment were found safer to L. pseudoamulata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorpyriphos seedling treatment was safer for L. pseudoamulata.

Treatment
chlorpyriphos as seedling treatmente0
Interactor
L. pseudoamulatae0other
Outcome
safer to L. pseudoamulatae0
Direction
safere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, cartap at higher dose and chlorpyriphos as seedling treatment were found safer to L. pseudoamulata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery application of cartap five days before pulling contained Nephotettix virescens Distart populations in the main field for up to 40 days after transplanting.

Treatment
cartape0
Interactor
Nephotettix virescens DistartNephotettix virescense0pest
Outcome
populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal.e0
Direction
containinge0
Qualifier
upto 40 days after transplaminge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nephotettix virescens
Nephotettix virescens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Braman Termite & Pest Elimination, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap and carbofuran in the nursery five days before pulling cat was found to be very effective in containing the populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal. in the main field upto 40 days after transplaming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery application of cartap five days before pulling contained Nilsparvata ingens Stal. populations in the main field for up to 40 days after transplanting.

Treatment
cartape0
Interactor
Nilsparvata ingens Stal.e0pest
Outcome
populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal.e0
Direction
containinge0
Qualifier
upto 40 days after transplaminge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap and carbofuran in the nursery five days before pulling cat was found to be very effective in containing the populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal. in the main field upto 40 days after transplaming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery application of carbofuran five days before pulling contained Nephotettix virescens Distart populations in the main field for up to 40 days after transplanting.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Nephotettix virescens DistartNephotettix virescense0pest
Outcome
populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal.e0
Direction
containinge0
Qualifier
upto 40 days after transplaminge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Nephotettix virescens
Nephotettix virescens · InteractorNatasha Wright, Braman Termite & Pest Elimination, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap and carbofuran in the nursery five days before pulling cat was found to be very effective in containing the populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal. in the main field upto 40 days after transplaming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nursery application of carbofuran five days before pulling contained Nilsparvata ingens Stal. populations in the main field for up to 40 days after transplanting.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Interactor
Nilsparvata ingens Stal.e0pest
Outcome
populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal.e0
Direction
containinge0
Qualifier
upto 40 days after transplaminge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cartap and carbofuran in the nursery five days before pulling cat was found to be very effective in containing the populations of both Nephotettix virescens Distart and Nilsparvata ingens Stal. in the main field upto 40 days after transplaming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–76 · show in text ↑

cartap · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

carbofuran · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

carbofuran · Nephotettix virescens · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transplanting · pest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.