Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Influence of Flower Inducer on Flowering, Yield and Fruit Quality of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapali Planted under Different Spacing

Laxmipriya Swain; Subash Ch. Swain; Satyanarayan Dash; et al.

5
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Flowering is the first of several events that lay the foundation for mango production every year. The temperatures below 15°C readily promote floral induction. Decrease in temperature below 20 0C is common in sub-tropical regions but seldom occurs in many tropical ones. So, an alternative strategy for optimum flower initiation under tropical condition is essentially required for increasing the productivity of plant. Among different strategies evolved, paclobutrazol and potassium nitrate application is effective not only in flower induction but also in early and offseason flower production in mango. Hence, an experiment was conducted to study the effect of paclobutrazol and potassium nitrate on the flowering, fruit yield and quality of Amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.) plants grown under different plant spacings at Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubaneswar during 2018-19 and 2019-20. The experiment was laid out in a Factorial Randomized Block Design with 24 treatment combinations and 2 replications. The treatment combinations consist of four levels of spacings (2.0 x 2.0 m, 4.0 x 2.0 m, 4.0 x 4.0 m, 8.0 x 2.0 m) and 6 levels of chemical treatments (Paclobutrazol@0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 g a.i. per meter of canopy spread and KNO3@ 2% and 4%) and a control with water application. The results revealed that plants spaced at 4.0 x 4.0 m with application of paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i. recorded maximum flowering intensity (82.48%), fruit set percentage (6.47%) and yield (11.12 kg/tree). Whereas the fruit quality parameters like TSS, acidity, reducing sugar, total sugar, ß carotene content are not significantly influenced by either due to plant spacing or flower inducer such as paclobutrazol and potassium nitrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango planted at 4.0 x 4.0 m and treated with paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i. had the highest flowering intensity (82.48%).

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicae1
Material
Amrapalie1
Treatment
plants spaced at 4.0 x 4.0 m with application of paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i.e3
Outcome
flowering intensitye3
Direction
maximume3
Value
82.48%e3
Setting
Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubanesware2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubaneswar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–878 · show in text ↑
e3

“plants spaced at 4.0 x 4.0 m with application of paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i. recorded maximum flowering intensity (82.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango planted at 4.0 x 4.0 m and treated with paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i. had the highest fruit set percentage (6.47%).

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicae1
Material
Amrapalie1
Treatment
plants spaced at 4.0 x 4.0 m with application of paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i.e3
Outcome
fruit set percentagee4
Direction
maximume3
Value
6.47%e4
Setting
Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubanesware2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubaneswar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–878 · show in text ↑
e3

“plants spaced at 4.0 x 4.0 m with application of paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i. recorded maximum flowering intensity (82.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1450 · show in text ↑
e4

“fruit set percentage (6.47%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mango planted at 4.0 x 4.0 m and treated with paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i. had the highest yield (11.12 kg/tree).

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicae1
Material
Amrapalie1
Treatment
plants spaced at 4.0 x 4.0 m with application of paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i.e3
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
maximume3
Value
11.12 kg/treee5
Setting
Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubanesware2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubaneswar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–878 · show in text ↑
e3

“plants spaced at 4.0 x 4.0 m with application of paclobutrazol 0.50 g a.i. recorded maximum flowering intensity (82.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1450 · show in text ↑
e5

“yield (11.12 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1506 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing and flower inducers did not significantly influence TSS, acidity or reducing sugar of Amrapali mango fruit.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicae1
Material
Amrapalie1
Treatment
plant spacing or flower inducer such as paclobutrazol and potassium nitratee6
Outcome
TSS, acidity, reducing sugare5
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Setting
Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubanesware2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubaneswar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–878 · show in text ↑
e5

“fruit quality parameters like TSS, acidity, reducing sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1578 · show in text ↑
e6

“are not significantly influenced by either due to plant spacing or flower inducer such as paclobutrazol and potassium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing and flower inducers did not significantly influence total sugar or beta-carotene content of Amrapali mango fruit.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicae1
Material
Amrapalie1
Treatment
plant spacing or flower inducer such as paclobutrazol and potassium nitratee6
Outcome
total sugar, ß carotene contente5
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Setting
Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubanesware2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Amrapali mango (Mangifera indica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–781 · show in text ↑
e2

“at Horticultural Research Station, OUAT, Bhubaneswar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–878 · show in text ↑
e5

“total sugar, ß carotene content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1611 · show in text ↑
e6

“are not significantly influenced by either due to plant spacing or flower inducer such as paclobutrazol and potassium nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1737 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

paclobutrazol · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

potassium nitrate · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

paclobutrazol · phenology · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

density · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.