Paper · 2023 · Agronomy

Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato to Low-Temperature Stress and Improve Fruit Quality

Guobin Li; Tieli Peng; Feng Qu; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
13
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Low-temperature stress seriously affects the growth, development, yield, and quality of tomato production. Bacillus methylotrophicus is an important plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). However, the role of B. methylotrophicus under low-temperature stress is poorly understood. Accordingly, the effects of B. methylotrophicus (‘VL-10′) on tomato cold stress (15 °C/8 °C, 12 h/12 h, and day/night) were studied. B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ was added into the substrate at the time of sowing, and the plants were treated at a low temperature for 2 weeks after 40 days of growth. We found that the low temperature reduced the spatial distribution of the aboveground and underground sections of tomatoes and the leaf SPAD and photochemical efficiency of PS II (Fv/Fm). After low-temperature stress, the tomato flowering was delayed, the vitamin C and lycopene content in fruit decreased, and the nitrate content increased. However, inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ during sowing promoted the growth of tomato seedlings, enhanced the native defense ability of the tomatoes, and effectively reduced the cold shock response of the roots to cold damage and the adverse effects of low temperature on leaf SPAD and Fv/Fm. After the cultivation at normal temperature, the inoculat B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ could rapidly regain plant growth levers, and eliminate the delay of low temperature on flowering. TOPSIS analysis showed that the nutritional quality of tomatoes could be effectively improved by inoculation with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ regardless of normal cultivation or low-temperature stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced the spatial distribution of the aboveground and underground sections of tomato plants.

Treatment
low temperaturee1
Outcome
spatial distribution of the aboveground and underground sections of tomatoese1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“the low temperature reduced the spatial distribution of the aboveground and underground sections of tomatoes and the leaf SPAD and photochemical efficiency of PS II (Fv/Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature reduced leaf SPAD and photochemical efficiency of PS II (Fv/Fm) in tomato.

Treatment
low temperaturee1
Outcome
leaf SPAD and photochemical efficiency of PS II (Fv/Fm)e1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“the low temperature reduced the spatial distribution of the aboveground and underground sections of tomatoes and the leaf SPAD and photochemical efficiency of PS II (Fv/Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-temperature stress delayed tomato flowering.

Treatment
low-temperature stresse2
Outcome
tomato floweringe2
Direction
delayede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“After low-temperature stress, the tomato flowering was delayed, the vitamin C and lycopene content in fruit decreased, and the nitrate content increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-temperature stress decreased vitamin C and lycopene content in tomato fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite2
Treatment
low-temperature stresse2
Outcome
vitamin C and lycopene content in fruite2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“After low-temperature stress, the tomato flowering was delayed, the vitamin C and lycopene content in fruit decreased, and the nitrate content increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-temperature stress increased nitrate content in tomato.

Treatment
low-temperature stresse2
Outcome
nitrate contente2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“After low-temperature stress, the tomato flowering was delayed, the vitamin C and lycopene content in fruit decreased, and the nitrate content increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. methyltrophicus VL-10 at sowing promoted growth of tomato seedlings under low temperature.

Treatment
inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′e3
Interactor
B. methyltrophicuse3symbiont
Outcome
growth of tomato seedlingse3
Direction
promotede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ during sowing promoted the growth of tomato seedlings, enhanced the native defense ability of the tomatoes, and effectively reduced the cold shock response of the roots to cold damage and the adverse effects of low temperature on leaf SPAD and Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. methyltrophicus VL-10 at sowing enhanced the native defense ability of tomato.

Treatment
inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′e3
Interactor
B. methyltrophicuse3symbiont
Outcome
native defense abilitye3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ during sowing promoted the growth of tomato seedlings, enhanced the native defense ability of the tomatoes, and effectively reduced the cold shock response of the roots to cold damage and the adverse effects of low temperature on leaf SPAD and Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. methyltrophicus VL-10 at sowing reduced the cold shock response of tomato roots.

Organ / stage
rootse3
Treatment
inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′e3
Interactor
B. methyltrophicuse3symbiont
Outcome
cold shock response of the rootse3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ during sowing promoted the growth of tomato seedlings, enhanced the native defense ability of the tomatoes, and effectively reduced the cold shock response of the roots to cold damage and the adverse effects of low temperature on leaf SPAD and Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. methyltrophicus VL-10 at sowing reduced the adverse effects of low temperature on leaf SPAD and Fv/Fm of tomato.

Treatment
inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′e3
Interactor
B. methyltrophicuse3symbiont
Outcome
adverse effects of low temperature on leaf SPAD and Fv/Fme3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“inoculated with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ during sowing promoted the growth of tomato seedlings, enhanced the native defense ability of the tomatoes, and effectively reduced the cold shock response of the roots to cold damage and the adverse effects of low temperature on leaf SPAD and Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After normal-temperature cultivation, inoculated tomato rapidly regained plant growth.

Treatment
inoculat B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′e4
Interactor
B. methyltrophicuse4symbiont
Outcome
plant growth leverse4
Direction
regaine4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“the inoculat B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ could rapidly regain plant growth levers, and eliminate the delay of low temperature on flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After normal-temperature cultivation, inoculated tomato eliminated the delay of low temperature on flowering.

Treatment
inoculat B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′e4
Interactor
B. methyltrophicuse4symbiont
Outcome
delay of low temperature on floweringe4
Direction
eliminatee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“the inoculat B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ could rapidly regain plant growth levers, and eliminate the delay of low temperature on flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with B. methyltrophicus VL-10 improved the nutritional quality of tomato regardless of cultivation temperature.

Treatment
inoculation with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′e5
Interactor
B. methyltrophicuse5symbiont
Outcome
nutritional quality of tomatoese5
Direction
improvede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bacillus methylotrophicus Could Improve the Tolerance and Recovery Ability of the Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e5

“the nutritional quality of tomatoes could be effectively improved by inoculation with B. methyltrophicus ‘VL-10′ regardless of normal cultivation or low-temperature stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1612 · show in text ↑

cold · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cold · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

cold · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 11 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

cold · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 3 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

135 papers in the same direction as this paper · 128 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

386 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.