Paper · 2023 · Plants

Transcriptome Analysis Revealed the Potential Molecular Mechanism of Anthocyanidins’ Improved Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings

Jie Wang; Zhipeng Yuan; Delin Li; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Anthocyanin, a kind of flavonoid, plays a crucial role in plant resistance to abiotic stress. Salt stress is a kind of abiotic stress that can damage the growth and development of plant seedlings. However, limited research has been conducted on the involvement of maize seedlings in salt stress resistance via anthocyanin accumulation, and its potential molecular mechanism is still unclear. Therefore, it is of great significance for the normal growth and development of maize seedlings to explore the potential molecular mechanism of anthocyanin improving salt tolerance of seedlings via transcriptome analysis. In this study, we identified two W22 inbred lines (tolerant line pur–W22 and sensitive line bro–W22) exhibiting differential tolerance to salt stress during seedling growth and development but showing no significant differences in seedling characteristics under non–treatment conditions. In order to identify the specific genes involved in seedlings’ salt stress response, we generated two recombinant inbred lines (RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22) by crossing pur–W22 and bro–W22, and then performed transcriptome analysis on seedlings grown under both non–treatment and salt treatment conditions. A total of 6100 and 5710 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22 seedlings, respectively, under salt–stressed conditions when compared to the non–treated groups. Among these DEGs, 3160 were identified as being present in both RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22, and these served as commonly stressed EDGs that were mainly enriched in the redox process, the monomer metabolic process, catalytic activity, the plasma membrane, and metabolic process regulation. Furthermore, we detected 1728 specific DEGs in the salt–tolerant RILpur–W22 line that were not detected in the salt–sensitive RILbro–W22 line, of which 887 were upregulated and 841 were downregulated. These DEGs are primarily associated with redox processes, biological regulation, and the plasma membrane. Notably, the anthocyanin synthesis related genes in RILpur–W22 were strongly induced under salt treatment conditions, which was consistented with the salt tolerance phenotype of its seedlings. In summary, the results of the transcriptome analysis not only expanded our understanding of the complex molecular mechanism of anthocyanin in improving the salt tolerance of maize seedlings, but also, the DEGs specifically expressed in the salt–tolerant line (RILpur–W22) provided candidate genes for further genetic analysis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment yielded 6100 DEGs in RILpur–W22 seedlings relative to non-treated groups.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILpur–W22e2
Outcome
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e2
Value
6100e2
Qualifier
under salt–stressed conditions when compared to the non–treated groupse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 6100 and 5710 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22 seedlings, respectively, under salt–stressed conditions when compared to the non–treated groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment yielded 5710 DEGs in RILbro–W22 seedlings relative to non-treated groups.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILbro–W22e2
Outcome
differentially expressed genes (DEGs)e2
Value
5710e2
Qualifier
under salt–stressed conditions when compared to the non–treated groupse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e2

“A total of 6100 and 5710 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22 seedlings, respectively, under salt–stressed conditions when compared to the non–treated groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

3160 DEGs were present in both RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22 under salt stress and were treated as commonly stressed DEGs.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22e3
Outcome
DEGse3
Value
3160e3
Qualifier
being present in bothe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among these DEGs, 3160 were identified as being present in both RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22, and these served as commonly stressed EDGs that were mainly enriched in the redox process, the monomer metabolic process, catalytic activity, the plasma membrane, and metabolic process regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The commonly stressed DEGs were mainly enriched in the redox process, the monomer metabolic process and catalytic activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
the redox process, the monomer metabolic process, catalytic activitye3
Qualifier
mainly enriched ine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among these DEGs, 3160 were identified as being present in both RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22, and these served as commonly stressed EDGs that were mainly enriched in the redox process, the monomer metabolic process, catalytic activity, the plasma membrane, and metabolic process regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The commonly stressed DEGs were mainly enriched in the plasma membrane and metabolic process regulation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
the plasma membrane, and metabolic process regulatione3
Qualifier
mainly enriched ine3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e3

“Among these DEGs, 3160 were identified as being present in both RILpur–W22 and RILbro–W22, and these served as commonly stressed EDGs that were mainly enriched in the redox process, the monomer metabolic process, catalytic activity, the plasma membrane, and metabolic process regulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1698 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RILpur–W22 had 1728 specific DEGs not detected in the salt-sensitive RILbro–W22 line.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILpur–W22e4
Outcome
specific DEGse4
Value
1728e4
Qualifier
not detected in the salt–sensitive RILbro–W22 linee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, we detected 1728 specific DEGs in the salt–tolerant RILpur–W22 line that were not detected in the salt–sensitive RILbro–W22 line, of which 887 were upregulated and 841 were downregulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the specific DEGs in RILpur–W22, 887 were upregulated.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILpur–W22e4
Outcome
specific DEGse4
Direction
upregulatede4
Value
887e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, we detected 1728 specific DEGs in the salt–tolerant RILpur–W22 line that were not detected in the salt–sensitive RILbro–W22 line, of which 887 were upregulated and 841 were downregulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of the specific DEGs in RILpur–W22, 841 were downregulated.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILpur–W22e4
Outcome
specific DEGse4
Direction
downregulatede4
Value
841e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e4

“Furthermore, we detected 1728 specific DEGs in the salt–tolerant RILpur–W22 line that were not detected in the salt–sensitive RILbro–W22 line, of which 887 were upregulated and 841 were downregulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The DEGs were primarily associated with redox processes, biological regulation and the plasma membrane.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
These DEGse5
Qualifier
primarily associated with redox processes, biological regulation, and the plasma membranee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e5

“These DEGs are primarily associated with redox processes, biological regulation, and the plasma membrane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin synthesis related genes were strongly induced under salt treatment in RILpur–W22, consistent with its salt tolerance phenotype.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILpur–W22e6
Treatment
salt treatment conditionse6
Gene
anthocyanin synthesis related genese6
Outcome
anthocyanin synthesis related genese6
Direction
strongly inducede6
Qualifier
consistented with the salt tolerance phenotype of its seedlingse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e6

“Notably, the anthocyanin synthesis related genes in RILpur–W22 were strongly induced under salt treatment conditions, which was consistented with the salt tolerance phenotype of its seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2007–2198 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specifically expressed DEGs of the salt-tolerant line provide candidate genes for further genetic analysis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
RILpur–W22e7
Outcome
candidate genese7
Qualifier
for further genetic analysise7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e7

“the DEGs specifically expressed in the salt–tolerant line (RILpur–W22) provided candidate genes for further genetic analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2402–2526 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant pur–W22 and sensitive bro–W22 lines did not differ in seedling characteristics without salt treatment.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
pur–W22e1
Outcome
seedling characteristicse1
Qualifier
under non–treatment conditionse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Salt Tolerance in Maize Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–127 · show in text ↑
e1

“In this study, we identified two W22 inbred lines (tolerant line pur–W22 and sensitive line bro–W22) exhibiting differential tolerance to salt stress during seedling growth and development but showing no significant differences in seedling characteristics under non–treatment conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–900 · show in text ↑

salinity · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 22 positive, 10 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.