Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Impact of the Interaction between Meloidogyne javanica and Fusarium oxysporum on the Okra Plantation

Manisha; S. P. Bishnoi; Mamata; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The development of diseases in cultivated crops depends on the complex interrelationship between the host, pathogen, and prevailing environmental conditions. The interaction between the root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica and the fungus Fusarium oxysporum was studied for the okra cultivar Pusa Sawani. Sequential and simultaneous inoculation of the nematode and fungus was performed to observe the disease severity in the plants due to the individual and interactive effects of the tested nematode and fungus. The results indicated that plant growth was adversely affected in all cases where the plant was inoculated with M. javanica and F. oxysporum, compared to the uninoculated control. The study clearly showed that nematodes act as predisposing factors in the spread of secondary fungal pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with M. javanica and F. oxysporum adversely affected okra growth relative to uninoculated plants.

Material
Pusa Sawanie1
Treatment
inoculated with M. javanica and F. oxysporume0
Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
Second interactor
F. oxysporumFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
adversely affectede0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth was adversely affected in all cases where the plant was inoculated with M. javanica and F. oxysporum, compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–693 · show in text ↑
e1

“the okra cultivar Pusa Sawani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–305 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematodes were interpreted as predisposing plants to spread of secondary fungal pathogens.

Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae2pathogen
Second interactor
Fusarium oxysporumFusarium oxysporume2pathogen
Outcome
spread of secondary fungal pathogense0
Qualifier
predisposing factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · Second interactorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematodes act as predisposing factors in the spread of secondary fungal pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–806 · show in text ↑
e1

“the okra cultivar Pusa Sawani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–305 · show in text ↑
e2

“the root knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica and the fungus Fusarium oxysporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–259 · show in text ↑

Meloidogyne javanica · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 46 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.