Paper · 2023 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Peanut crop yield under full and deficit irrigation in the reproductive phase

Antonio M. P. Bertino; Rogério T. de Faria; Anderson P. Coelho; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Peanut cultivation has national and global significance in agriculture and industry. Under water-limited conditions, its yield decreases to the extent that it compromises the success of the exploitation. This study focused on evaluating peanut crop yield and production components under full and deficit irrigation applied in the reproductive phase, to determine the impact of water supply on the yield of peanuts grown in the off-season in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The experiment was conducted for two years and followed a randomized blocks design with five irrigation levels distributed in strips, with four repetitions. The treatments consisted of crop evapotranspiration replenishments from 100 to 10%. In the first year, under suitable temperatures, the maximum yield reached 3,922 kg ha-1 with the application of 277 mm of irrigation depth and decreased up to 35% with the lowest irrigation depth (48 mm). In the second year, suboptimal temperatures caused a delay in the growing cycle and caused a 33% reduction in crop yields. Despite the potential benefits of deficit irrigation in increasing water productivity, low temperatures pose a risk to peanut yield, especially during the off-season crop in the region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yield reached a maximum with 277 mm of irrigation depth in the first year.

Treatment
application of 277 mm of irrigation depthe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
3,922 kg ha-1e1
Qualifier
In the first year, under suitable temperaturese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut crop yield under full and deficit irrigation in the reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the first year, under suitable temperatures, the maximum yield reached 3,922 kg ha-1 with the application of 277 mm of irrigation depth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–861 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decreased by up to 35% with the lowest irrigation depth (48 mm) in the first year.

Treatment
lowest irrigation depth (48 mm)e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
35%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut crop yield under full and deficit irrigation in the reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“the maximum yield reached 3,922 kg ha-1 with the application of 277 mm of irrigation depth and decreased up to 35% with the lowest irrigation depth (48 mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suboptimal temperatures in the second year reduced crop yields by 33%.

Treatment
suboptimal temperaturese3
Outcome
crop yieldse3
Direction
reductione3
Value
33%e3
Qualifier
In the second yeare3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut crop yield under full and deficit irrigation in the reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“In the second year, suboptimal temperatures caused a delay in the growing cycle and caused a 33% reduction in crop yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1049 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Suboptimal temperatures delayed the growing cycle of peanut in the second year.

Treatment
suboptimal temperaturese4
Outcome
growing cyclee4
Direction
delaye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Peanut crop yield under full and deficit irrigation in the reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“suboptimal temperatures caused a delay in the growing cycle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1007 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperatures pose a risk to peanut yield, especially for the off-season crop in the region.

Treatment
low temperaturese5
Outcome
yielde5
Qualifier
especially during the off-season crope5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e5

“low temperatures pose a risk to peanut yield, especially during the off-season crop in the region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1235 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 168 positive, 23 negative or no effect

167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.