Paper · 2023 · PeerJ

Biochar improves the growth and physiological traits of alfalfa, amaranth and maize grown under salt stress

Dilfuza Jabborova; Tokhtasin Abdrakhmanov; Zafarjon Jabbarov; et al.

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Purpose: Salinity is a main factor in decreasing seed germination, plant growth and yield. Salinity stress is a major problem for economic crops, as it can reduce crop yields and quality. Salinity stress occurs when the soil or water in which a crop is grown has a high salt content. Biochar improve plant growth and physiological traits under salt stress. The aim of the present study, the impact of biochar on growth, root morphological traits and physiological properties of alfalfa, amaranth and maize and soil enzyme activities under saline sands. Methods: We studied the impact of biochar on plant growth and the physiological properties of alfalfa, amaranth and maize under salt stress conditions. After 40 days, plant growth parameters (plant height, shoot and root fresh weights), root morphological traits and physiological properties were measured. Soil nutrients such as the P, K and total N contents in soil and soil enzyme activities were analyzed. Results: The results showed that the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments significantly enhanced the plant height and root morphological traits over the control. The biochar on significantly increased the total root length, root diameter, and root volume. Compared to the control, the biochar significantly increased the chlorophyll a and b content, total chlorophyll and carotenoid content under salt stress. Furthermore, the biochar significantly increased enzyme activities of soil under salt stress in the three crops. Conclusions: Biochar treatments promote plant growth and physiological traits of alfalfa, amaranth, and maize under the salt stress condition. Overall, biochar is an effective way to mitigate salinity stress in crops. It can help to reduce the amount of salt in the soil, improve the soil structure, and increase the availability of essential nutrients, which can all help to improve crop yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly increased plant height in maize, alfalfa and amaranth relative to controls under salt stress.

Taxon
maize, alfalfa, and amaranthAmaranthus caudatusMedicago sativaZea mayse0
Treatment
biochar treatmentse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments significantly enhanced the plant height and root morphological traits over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa, amaranth and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly enhanced root morphological traits in the three crops relative to controls.

Taxon
maize, alfalfa, and amaranthAmaranthus caudatusMedicago sativaZea mayse0
Treatment
biochar treatmentse0
Outcome
root morphological traitse0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments significantly enhanced the plant height and root morphological traits over the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa, amaranth and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly increased total root length, root diameter and root volume.

Taxon
maize, alfalfa, and amaranthAmaranthus caudatusMedicago sativaZea mayse1
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
total root length, root diameter, and root volumee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biochar on significantly increased the total root length, root diameter, and root volume.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa, amaranth and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly increased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll under salt stress relative to controls.

Taxon
maize, alfalfa, and amaranthAmaranthus caudatusMedicago sativaZea mayse1
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b content, total chlorophylle0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, the biochar significantly increased the chlorophyll a and b content, total chlorophyll and carotenoid content under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa, amaranth and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly increased carotenoid content under salt stress relative to controls.

Taxon
maize, alfalfa, and amaranthAmaranthus caudatusMedicago sativaZea mayse1
Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
carotenoid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the control, the biochar significantly increased the chlorophyll a and b content, total chlorophyll and carotenoid content under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1389 · show in text ↑
t0

“alfalfa, amaranth and maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“the maize, alfalfa, and amaranth under biochar treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1053 · show in text ↑

biochar · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 31 positive, 1 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

biochar · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

190 papers: 180 positive, 10 negative or no effect

179 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

186 papers more in this group

See all 190 papers →

biochar · growth · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biochar · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.