Paper · 2023 · Revista Caatinga

Production of pear cv. ‘Triunfo’ under irrigation systems and depths in the sub-middle São Francisco region

Victor H. F. Gomes; Welson L. Simões; Marlon da S. Garrido; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aiming at the search for a new alternative for the sustainability of the properties in the irrigated areas of the Brazilian Northeast, the objective of this study was to identify the ideal irrigation system and depth for a better yield and quality of pear fruits in the Sub-middle São Francisco region. The experiment was conducted in the commercial orchard of the Frutos do Sol farm, located in the municipality of Petrolina, PE, Brazil, from October 2016 to November 2017. The treatments consisted of four irrigation depths (60; 80; 100 and 120% of crop evapotranspiration - ETc), under two irrigation systems (drip and micro-sprinkler), in two crop cycles of ‘Triunfo’ pear. Yield, average fruit weight, water productivity, pulp firmness and titratable acidity, total soluble solids and lightness of the fruits were analyzed. Irrigation depths of 96.04% and 94.84% ETc promote, respectively, the highest marketable yields for the first (43.48 t ha-1) and second (26.55 t ha-1) cycle of ‘Triunfo’ pear in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Drip irrigation system in the warmer period promotes higher yield. The cultivation of ‘Triunfo’ pear irrigated by drip and micro-sprinkler promotes fruits with good commercial quality in the Brazilian semi-arid region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An irrigation depth of 96.04% ETc gave the highest first-cycle marketable yield of 43.48 t ha-1.

Material
‘Triunfo’t0
Treatment
96.04%e0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
43.48 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
firste0
Setting
Brazilian semi-arid regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear cv. ‘Triunfo’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation depths of 96.04% and 94.84% ETc promote, respectively, the highest marketable yields for the first (43.48 t ha-1) and second (26.55 t ha-1) cycle of ‘Triunfo’ pear in the Brazilian semi-arid region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An irrigation depth of 94.84% ETc gave the highest second-cycle marketable yield of 26.55 t ha-1.

Material
‘Triunfo’t0
Treatment
94.84%e0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
26.55 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
seconde0
Setting
Brazilian semi-arid regione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear cv. ‘Triunfo’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation depths of 96.04% and 94.84% ETc promote, respectively, the highest marketable yields for the first (43.48 t ha-1) and second (26.55 t ha-1) cycle of ‘Triunfo’ pear in the Brazilian semi-arid region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation gave higher pear yield during the warmer period.

Treatment
Drip irrigation systeme0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
warmer periode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear cv. ‘Triunfo’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drip irrigation system in the warmer period promotes higher yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both drip and micro-sprinkler irrigation produced commercially good pear fruit in the Brazilian semi-arid region.

Material
‘Triunfo’e0
Treatment
drip and micro-sprinklere0
Outcome
fruits with good commercial qualitye0
Setting
Brazilian semi-arid regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pear cv. ‘Triunfo’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The cultivation of ‘Triunfo’ pear irrigated by drip and micro-sprinkler promotes fruits with good commercial quality in the Brazilian semi-arid region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1266 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 12 positive, 11 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.